1 / 22

One group pretest post-test design

One group pretest post-test design. A common example of Pre-Experimental Designs No control group No random selection of participants Little power to establish causation. One Group Study Design Select/recruit volunteers Administer pre-test Provide Treatment Administer post-test.

cillian
Télécharger la présentation

One group pretest post-test design

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. One group pretest post-test design

  2. A common example of Pre-Experimental Designs No control group No random selection of participants Little power to establish causation One Group Study Design Select/recruit volunteers Administer pre-test Provide Treatment Administer post-test One Group Pre-Post Design Methodology

  3. Development of Race Profiles for the Performance of a Simulated 2000-m Rowing RaceKennedy & Bell, 2003

  4. Research Purpose • -To create race profiles of men and women rowers before and after training using a simulated 2000-m rowing race. • -To observe the effect of: • -Men vs. women • -Before vs. after training

  5. Study Design and Methodology • Subject characteristics • Recruited from local rowing clubs • Actively training for preceding 3 months • 7 male, 11 female novice rowers • 12 male, 8 female experienced rowers Informed consent & Ethics approved by U of Alberta and Faculty of Phys.Ed.

  6. Study Design and Methodology • Race Simulation Structure • 2000 meter race in lowest time • Performed on a Concept II Model C • Time, distance, stroke rate, 500-m split time displayed for rowers • HR, split time/500-m time & stroke rate recorded every 200-m.

  7. Study Design and Methodology • Testing Protocol (Before & after training) • 2000-m simulated race time • Combined VT/VO2max test • Horizon metabolic cart • Polar Heart Rate monitor • Multiple Repetition Maximum tests

  8. Study Design and Methodology • Training Treatment Specifics • Ten week program: • Individually prescribed and periodized • Progressive overload • Strength Component: 2x/week • Upper and lower body exercises • 65-90% predicted 1-RM • Aerobic Component: 4x/week • Three continuous and one interval workout • Performed on Concept II Model C

  9. Data Analysis • All variables collected manually from the Concept II display (stroke rate, time, distance, 500-m. split time) • Used to calculate velocity, mean race velocity (MRV), deviation from MRV, and standard deviation of MRV every 200-m.

  10. Data Analysis • Mean Race Velocity (MRV) • Average of all race velocities taken at 200-m. intervals • Deviation from MRV • Specific race velocities taken at 200-m. intervals minus MRV • Standard Deviation from MRV • Average deviation of all participants from their mean race velocity at a given interval

  11. Data Analysis • Race Profile Definition: • Provides a descriptive graphical illustration of spontaneous pacing behavior • Is a known factor in sport performance that has received little attention in the sport of rowing • Deviation from MRV plotted against MRV

  12. Major Findings • Physiological Improvements

  13. Race Profile (Male Pre-test)

  14. Race Profile (Male Post-test)

  15. “Constant Pace” (Fast Male Post)

  16. “All-Out” (Fast Female Post)

  17. Major Findings • Differences in pacing with training • Moved toward a constant pace model and improved pace • Differences in pacing between genders • Fastest males adhered most closely to the constant pace strategy • Fastest females adhered to an all-out strategy not adopted by any other groups

  18. Discussion • All-out pace profile (fastest women) • Close to higher intensity sports • Unknown if adhering to a constant pace would have resulted in improved performance • Constant pace profile (fastest men) • Close to similar well-documented sports • Short duration cycling (4000-m.)

  19. Critique • Pre-post inability to establish causation • has no control group • Learning effect (author’s critique) • Possible that fastest female rowers were novice • During 2000 m test verbal encouragement used • could affect final results • Compared group vs. 3 fastest rowers of each sex • should have compared novice vs. experienced rowers

  20. Critique cont’d • Tested during off-season • rowers not in physical or mental shape of race • Transferability not good • test is on rowing ergometer vs. boat in water • racing strategy often dependent on situation relative to competitors

  21. Suggestions/Future Considerations • Need to assess elite level competition to strongly establish nature of optimal race strategy etc. • Done on water (author’s suggestion) • Compare matched groups using alternate approaches • Compare all out strategy vs. constant for 2000 m race

  22. Specific to rowing what is psychologically going on during the race General for Pre-Post design add a control group eg. Choosing own method of rowing vs. racing strategy Other Possible Questions for Similar Research

More Related