1 / 46

Tutorial #2

Tutorial #2. Quiz next week. Cover everything you’ve seen in the course so far Combination of True/False, definition, short answer, or some similar question from the problem set. How to design a PCR primer?.

cira
Télécharger la présentation

Tutorial #2

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Tutorial #2

  2. Quiz next week • Cover everything you’ve seen in the course so far • Combination of True/False, definition, short answer, or some similar question from the problem set

  3. How to design a PCR primer? • Primer length and sequence are of critical importance in designing the parameters of a successful amplification • A simple formula for calculating the Tm Tm = 4(G + C) + 2(A + T) • When designing a PCR primer, Tm is not the only thing, should also consider; the GC content, any secondary structure or hairpin loop

  4. Example Design PCR primer to amplify IFI16 (interferon, gamma-inducible protein 16)

  5. NCBI

  6. Synonymous Vs Nonsynonymous • When studying the evolutionary divergences of DNA sequence • Synonymous = silent • Nonsynonymous = amino acid altering • The rates of these nucleotide substitution maybe used as a molecular clock for dating the evolutionary time of closely related species

  7. Calculating Synonymous sites (s) and nonsynonymous sites (n) • Each codon has 3 nucleotides, denote by fi (I = 1,2,3) • Where s and n for a codon are given by s = ∑3i=1fiand n = (3-s) Ex. TTA (Leu) f1=1/3 (T→C) f2=0 f3=1/3 (A→G) Thus, s = 2/3 and n = 7/3 • For DNA sequence of r codons, it will be s = ∑ri=1siand n = (3r-s), where siis the value of s for the ith codon

  8. Calculation of s and n for 2 nucleotide differences between 2 codons Ex. GTT (Val) and GTA (Val) 1 synonymous difference Denote sdand nd the number of synonymous and nonsynonymous differences per codon, respectively sd = 1 nd = 0

  9. Con’t Ex. TTT and GTA, 2 pathways to get there Pathway #1: TTT(Phe)↔GTT(Val)↔GTA(Val) Pathway #2: TTT(Phe)↔TTA(Leu)↔GTA(Val) Pathway 1 involve 1 synonymous and 1 nonsynonymous substitution Pathway 2 involve 2 nonsynonymous substitution sd = 1 synonymous substitution / 2 change state = 0.5 nd = 3 nonsysnonymous substitution / 2 change state =1.5 D in the problem set = proportion of synonymous or nonsynonymous differences, therefore, for this nonsynonymous site, the Dn would be 1 / 1.5 = 0.667 Note thatsd + ndis equal to the total number of nucleotide differences between the two DNA sequences compared

  10. Sequence Alignment • Every alignment will have a scoring system • Base change cost = 1 • Gap cost = 2 • Gap extension cost = 1 • Ex. ACT GTT GCC AG - C - - GCT Score of this alignment would be 3 + 2x2 + 1 = 8 In this case, a higher score means a worst alignment

  11. MLST - Methods • Isolate multiple strains of species of interest • PCR ~500bp regions of 4-20 housekeeping genes (“loci”) • Sequence PCR products • Assign “allele numbers” to each locus • Arbitrary, each # represents a different sequence 2 3 1 2 1 1 1 2 1

  12. 2 3 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 MLST - Methods • Collate the information into a table • Row = isolate • Column = loci • Fill in allele numbers

  13. MLST of a Halorubrum Population • 36 isolates • 4 housekeeping genes • atpB • ef-2 • radA • secY • 500bp PCR product • Allelic profiles vary • Few identical pairs • All loci polymorphic • 8-15 alleles

  14. Insights from the MLST Data - 1 How genetically diverse is the saltern Archaeal population? Genetic diversity H = 1-Σxi2 • Overall genetic diversity = 0.69 • Varied between ponds of different salinity • 0.57 in 23% saline pond • 0.83 in 36% saline pond • Higher than E. coli diversity of 0.47 • >5x higher than eukaryotic diversity

  15. Insights from the MLST Data - 2 Is recombination occurring in the Archaea? Linkage disequilibrium calculator – mlst.net • LD = Alleles are linked and are transferred together during recombination • LE = Alleles are not linked and recombination scatters them randomly • Halorubrum population is near linkage equilibrium • Suggests recombination is occurring

  16. Tetraodon Nigroviridis 2X? Nature Reviews Genetics3; 838-849 (2002);

  17. Phylogenetic tree • Phylogenetics is the field of systematics that focuses on evolutionary relationship between organisms or genes/proteins (phylogeny) A node Human Mouse Fly A clade clade -- A monophyletic taxon taxon -- Any named group of organisms, not necessarily a clade.

  18. A phylogenetic tree A node A+B+C is less than D+B+C So the mouse Sequence is more related to fly than the human sequence is to fly in this example Human Mouse Fly D A C A clade B

  19. Tetraodon gene evolution • Fourfold degenerate (4D) site substitution - a mesure of neutral nucleotide mutations • 4D site = 3rd base of codon free to change with no FX on AA • # of AA changes at these sites = neutral mutations • Fish proteins have diverged faster vs. mammalian homologues Figure 3

  20. Brief generalization of the papers • Comparative genomics help identifying region of DNA that are shared between two different species and allows the transfer of information between both species in the common region. • It can also detect regions that have gone through chromosomes rearrangement occurring in many different diseases. This information can be of different type. • 1) Using one of the species it is possible to transfer annotation information that were not known in the other species, • 2) identify region that are under selective pressure, • 3) It is also possible to compare for examples regions that have gone through chromosomes rearrangement with annotation genes map to identify genes responsible for a particular disease

  21. Homologs Have common origins but may or may not have common activity • Orthologs – Homologs produced by speciation. They tend to have similar function • Paralogs – Homologs produced by gene duplication. They tend to have differing function • Xenologs – Homologs resulting from horizontal gene transfer between two organism

  22. BLAST • Basic Local Alignment Search Tool • Developed in 1990 and 1997 (S. Altschul) • A heuristic method (Fast alignment method) for performing local alignments through searches of high scoring segment pairs (HSP’s) • 1st to use statistics to predict significance of initial matches - saves on false leads • Offers both sensitivity and speed

  23. BLAST • Looks for clusters of nearby or locally dense “similar or homologous” k-tuples • Uses “look-up” tables to shorten search time • Uses larger “word size” than FASTA to accelerate the search process • Can generate “domain friendly” local alignments • Fastest and most frequently used sequence alignment tool –BECAME THE STANDARD

  24. Connecting HSP’s

  25. -x -e P(x) = 1 - e Extreme Value Distribution = • Kmne-lS is called Expect or E-value • In BLAST, default E cutoff = 10 so P = 0.99995 • If E is small then P is small • Why does BLAST report an E-value instead of a p value? • E-values of 5 and 10 are easier to understand than P-values of 0.993 and 0.99995. • However, note that when E < 0.01, P-values and E-value are nearly identical.

  26. Expect value • Kmne-lS = Expect or E-value What parameters does it depend on? - l and K are two parameters – natural scales for search space size and scoring system, respectively • l = lnq/p and K = (q-p)2/q • p = probability of match (i.e. 0.05) • q = probability of not match (i.e. 0.95) • Then l = 2.94 and K =0.85 • p and q calculated from a “random sequence model” (Altschul, S.F. & Gish, W. (1996) "Local alignment statistics." Meth. Enzymol. 266:460-480.) based on given subst. matrix and gap costs - m = length of sequence - n = length of database - S = score for given HSP

  27. Expect value • Expect value an intuitive value but… • Expect value changes as database changes • Expect value becomes zero quickly • Alternative: bit score S' (bits) = [lambda * S (raw) - ln K] / ln 2 • Independent of scoring system used - normalized • Larger value for more similar sequences, therefore useful in analyses of very similar sequences

  28. Similarity by chance – the impact of sequence complexity MCDEFGHIKLAN…. High Complexity ACTGTCACTGAT…. Mid Complexity NNNNTTTTTNNN…. Low Complexity Low complexity sequences are more likely to appear similar by chance

More Related