1 / 28

UKNF – 24 th June 2003

UKNF – 24 th June 2003. SR proposals: Introduction - Ken Long Proton Driver - Ian Gardner Targetry - Paul Drumm Design Study - Rob Edgecock World-wide Design Study - Rob Edgecock Status of MICE - Giles Barr

ciro
Télécharger la présentation

UKNF – 24 th June 2003

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. UKNF – 24th June 2003 • SR proposals: Introduction - Ken Long Proton Driver - Ian Gardner Targetry - Paul Drumm Design Study - Rob Edgecock • World-wide Design Study - Rob Edgecock • Status of MICE - Giles Barr • Summary of NuFact’03 - Peter Norton • MuScat 2003 - Malcolm Ellis

  2. Other stuff • UK Neutrino Factory design - Complete layout at RAL - Incorporates proton driver and target work • World-wide design study- Introduction - View from Europe - “ “ Japan - “ “ US - Conclusions of discussion at NuFact’03 • Summary of bid

  3. Target Cooling Proton driver UK Neutrino Factory Design RAL Neutrino Factory layout

  4. NF Layout • Need to complete current design work: - proton driver (HARP results) - targetry - muon frontend • Need to extend to remainder of machine- muon acceleration - storage ring • Need to optimise • Need to produce coherent design

  5. Frontend without Cooling Grahame Rees et al Pion-muon decay channel 88 MHz muon linac

  6. Frontends with Cooling

  7. Frontends without Cooling Solenoid channel Es=190MeV Solenoid channel Es=190MeV RF phase rotation channel Es=190MeV Inverse rotation channel Es=190MeV Linac Es=400MeV (Transmission =77%) Linac Es=400MeV Transmission comparable to 44/88MHz scheme

  8. Rings Grahame Rees et al S = solenoid, A = absorber, 36 cavities in blocks of 3 • Hybrid ring, using solenoids and dipoles • 44m circumference: 18m straights, 4m bends • 4m sections for injection and extraction • Initial results looking promising

  9. World-Wide Design Study • Introduction • View from Europe - RE • “ “ Japan - Yoshi Kuno • “ “ US - Mike Zisman • Conclusions from the discussion

  10. Introduction • Two years since Study II • A lot has been done since then • Time to start thinking about a third study • Much better:world study • Europe, Japan and US • Parallel session of WG3 devoted to this • Views of each region • Discussion on how to form world-wide study

  11. View from…….Europe • No design study so far • Work started late 1990s • Much achieved • Two layouts: CERN (complete) RAL (under development) • Effort dramatically reduced by CERN budget cuts • ECFA task forces re-organised  European Neutrino Group • Very important: rejuvenate EU activities

  12. Design Study – European View • Fixed by EU Framework 6 programme • FP5: 2 Neutrino Factory related bids, both failed • FP6: ESGARD formed - coordinated bid for accelerator R&D • Two areas of interest: Integrating Activities Design Studies • IA proposal already submitted: LHC upgrade, LC, NF • Basically for improving existing infrastructure IA  Neutrino Factory, superbeam, beta beam network HIPPI JRA

  13. FP6 Design Studies • EC will contribute to: • Feasibility studies – paper studies • Technical Preparatory Work – hardware • On new research infrastructures with a clear European dimension and interest. • Includes: future facilities of world-wide relevance not existing in Europe infrastructures constructed outside EU!

  14. FP6 Design Studies Feasibility studies • Aim: Lay conceptual foundations for new infrastructure • Methods: • Basic feasibility study • Explore new fundamental technology • Detailed engineering design, particularly most advanced TPW • Includes: • Development and testing of critical components, sub-systems, materials or techniques, including software • Does not include: • preparatory work based on existing or proven techniques • reproduction of available components or materials

  15. FP6 Design Studies Funding: • Total budget: 200M€; 70M€ in first call • EC contribution per project  10M€ • 50% matching required(?) Timing: • Call for proposals: October 2003 • Deadline: Spring 2004 • Evaluation results: Summer 2004 • Contract signatures: Start 2005

  16. Design Study Bid • EU will make FP6 Design Study bid • Essential to re-build activities in Europe • Host laboratory: RAL (possibly!) • Much better if part of world-wide design study • FP6 allows for/encourages this • May also provide some funding • Aim: ?DR for a Neutrino Factory ~2009

  17. View from……Japan • Design study published July 2002 • Little support from KEK management • Based on FFAGs

  18. View from……Japan

  19. View from……Japan

  20. View from……Japan Staging Physics outcomes at each stage • High Power Proton Driver • Muon g-2 • Muon Factory (PRISM) • Muon LFV • Muon Factory-II (PRISM-II) • Muon EDM • Neutrino Factory • Based on 1 MW proton beam • Neutrino Factory-II • Based on 4.4 MW proton beam • Muon Collider

  21. View from……Japan My interpretation of conclusions • Would support a world-wide design study • Concern expressed about overlap due to FFAGs • Would prefer some level of overlap for active participation • Timescale depends on J-PARCnu, LC, etc

  22. View from……..US Two feasibility studies so far in US FS1: • Instigated by FNAL director • MC invited to participate • Focus was on feasibility • First attempt to specify NF from end-to-end • Design based on (reasonably) well understood technology • No attempt to optimise cost • Cost was a deliverable • Feasibility was established • Performance poor, costs high

  23. View from……..US FS2: • Collaboration between MC and BNL director • BNL managers able to draw on resources • Goal: maintain feasibility, but improve performance • Cost optimisation again given lower priority • Performance: 6x Study I • Cost: 75% (but only one RLA) • Still too high

  24. View from……..US FS3: • Need to reduce cost • Much progress already: Neuffer RF phase rotation FFAG ring or VRCS Ring coolers • Need to look for optimum between Proton driver Cooling Acceleration Detector • But much better if world-wide study • Possible host site (MICE): RAL

  25. Discussion Should there be a world-wide design study? Yes How should we proceed? Create a steering group US: Steve Geer Bob PalmerMike Zisman Japan: Yoshi Kuno Yoshi Mori Kenso Nakamura Europe: Alain Blondel(?) Rob Edgecock Helmut Haseroth What should be included? Accelerator and detector Name? WDS1(?)

  26. Discussion Timescale? Format? Host laboratory? Aim? Etc…..

  27. 2003/04 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 Neutrino Factory Design FTE 0.1 2.0 4.0 8.0 Staff cost 7. 146. 304. 640. Capital and recurrent 0. 10. 50. 500. VAT (17.5%) 0. 2. 9. 18. Travel 1. 3. 10. 20. Sub-total 8. 161. 373. 1178. Proton Driver FTE 1.9 5.0 9.0 16.0 Staff cost 133. 365. 684. 1280. Capital and recurrent 0. 500. 500. 1000. VAT (17.5%) 0. 88. 88. 175. Travel 3. 7. 20. 40. Sub-total 136. 960. 1292. 2395. Cost Summary

  28. Target Studies FTE 0.7 5.0 10.0 12.0 Staff cost 50. 365. 760. 960. Capital and recurrent 0. 360. 900. 1000. VAT (17.5%) 0. 63. 158. 175. Travel 1. 10. 25. 30. Sub-total 51. 798. 1843. 2165. Design Study FTE 0.5 0.5 3.5 5.0 Staff cost 35. 37. 266. 400. Capital and recurrent 0. 0. 0. 50. VAT (17.5%) 0. 0. 0. 9. Travel 2. 2. 5. 10. Sub-total 37. 39. 271. 469. Total 232. 1958. 3779. 6207. Working margin (10%) 23. 196. 378. 621. TOTAL 255. 2154. 4157. 6828. Cost Summary

More Related