1 / 43

Articulated Pose Estimation with Flexible Mixtures of Parts

Articulated Pose Estimation with Flexible Mixtures of Parts . Yi Yang & Deva Ramanan University of California, Irvine. Goal. Articulated pose estimation ( ) recovers the pose of an articulated object which consists of joints and rigid parts. Applications. Unconstrained Images.

clifford
Télécharger la présentation

Articulated Pose Estimation with Flexible Mixtures of Parts

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Articulated Pose Estimation with Flexible Mixtures of Parts Yi Yang & Deva Ramanan University of California, Irvine

  2. Goal Articulated pose estimation ( ) recovers the pose of an articulated object which consists of joints and rigid parts

  3. Applications

  4. Unconstrained Images

  5. Classic Approach Part Representation • Head, Torso, Arm, Leg • Location, Rotation, Scale Marr & Nishihara 1978

  6. Classic Approach Part Representation • Head, Torso, Arm, Leg • Location, Rotation, Scale Marr & Nishihara 1978 Pictorial Structure • Unary Templates • Pairwise Springs Fischler & Elschlager 1973 Felzenszwalb & Huttenlocher 2005

  7. Classic Approach Part Representation • Head, Torso, Arm, Leg • Location, Rotation, Scale Marr & Nishihara 1978 Pictorial Structure • Unary Templates • Pairwise Springs Fischler & Elschlager 1973 Felzenszwalb & Huttenlocher 2005 Lan & Huttenlocher 2005 Andriluka etc. 2009 Sigal & Black 2006 Eichner etc. 2009 Singh etc. 2010 Ramanan 2007 Epshteian & Ullman 2007 Johnson & Everingham 2010 Wang & Mori 2008 Sapp etc. 2010 Ferrari etc. 2008 Tran & Forsyth 2010

  8. Problem: Wide Variations

  9. Problem: Wide Variations

  10. Problem: Wide Variations Naïve brute-force evaluation is expensive

  11. Our Method – “Mini-Parts” Key idea: “mini part” model can approximate deformations

  12. Example: Arm Approximation

  13. Example: Torso Approximation

  14. Key Advantages • Flexibility: General affine warps (orientation, foreshortening, …) • Speed: Mixtures of local templates + dynamic programming

  15. Pictorial Structure Model • : Image • : Location of part

  16. Pictorial Structure Model • : Unary template for part • : Local image features at location

  17. Pictorial Structure Model • : Spatial features between and • : Pairwise springs between part and part

  18. Our Flexible Mixture Model • : Mixture of part

  19. Our Flexible Mixture Model • : Mixture of part • : Unary template for part with mixture

  20. Our Flexible Mixture Model • : Mixture of part • : Unary template for part with mixture • : Pairwise springs between part with mixture and part with mixture

  21. Our Flexible Mixture Model • : Mixture of part • : Unary template for part with mixture • : Pairwise springs between part with mixture and part with mixture

  22. Co-occurrence “Bias” • : Pairwise co-occurrence prior between part with mixture and part with mixture

  23. Co-occurrence “Bias” • : Pairwise co-occurrence prior between part with mixture and part with mixture

  24. Co-occurrence “Bias” • : Pairwise co-occurrence prior between part with mixture and part with mixture

  25. Inference & Learning Inference For a tree graph (V,E): dynamicprogramming

  26. Inference & Learning Inference For a tree graph (V,E): dynamicprogramming Given labeled positive and negative , write , and Learning

  27. Benchmark Datasets

  28. How to Get Part Mixtures? Solution: Cluster relative locations of joints w.r.t. parents

  29. Articulation

  30. Articulation parts, mixtures unique pictorial structures

  31. Articulation parts, mixtures unique pictorial structures Not all are equally likely --- “prior” given by

  32. Qualitative Results

  33. Quantitative Results on PARSE % of correctly localized limbs All previous work use explicitly articulated models

  34. Quantitative Results on PARSE % of correctly localized limbs 1 second per image

  35. More Parts and Mixtures Help 14 parts (joints) 27 parts (joints + midpoints)

  36. Quantitative Results on BUFFY % of correctly localized limbs Our algorithm = 5 seconds -vs- Next best = 5 minutes

  37. Quantitative Results on BUFFY % of correctly localized limbs All previous work use explicitly articulated models

  38. Human Detection

  39. Conclusion • Model affine warps with a part-based model

  40. Conclusion • Model affine warps with a part-based model • Exponential set of pictorial structures

  41. Conclusion • Model affine warps with a part-based model • Exponential set of pictorial structures • Flexible vs rigid relations

  42. Conclusion • Model affine warps with a part-based model • Exponential set of pictorial structures • Flexible vs rigid relations • Supervision helps

  43. Thank you

More Related