1 / 18

3. Business Cycle Theories (Survey)

3. Business Cycle Theories (Survey). History : pre-Keynesian vs. modern theories Principal : real vs. monetary theories Stability : endogenous instability vs. exogenous shocks („ rocking chair “) Price flexibility : new Keynesian vs. new classical Macroeconomics.

clive
Télécharger la présentation

3. Business Cycle Theories (Survey)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 3. Business Cycle Theories (Survey) • History: pre-Keynesian vs. modern theories • Principal: real vs. monetarytheories • Stability : endogenousinstability vs. exogenousshocks („rockingchair“) • Price flexibility: newKeynesian vs. newclassicalMacroeconomics KuB 4 1 U van Suntum, Vorlesung KuB 1

  2. KuB 3.1 2 KuB 4 2 U van Suntum, Vorlesung KuB 2

  3. Interdependency of Macroeconomics M * V : P = monetary/monetaristic theories C + S = Y = C + I + E + EX - IM = Lnet + Gnet + T underconsumption theories Keynesian theories distribution theories KuB 3.1 3 U van Suntum, Vorlesung KuB 3 KuB 4 3

  4. Basic idea of monetary theories HP = Mv = MB * m * v (quantityequation) • v dependent on i anddP/dt)/P => instability • m dependent on behaviorofbanksandhouseholds => instability KuB 3.1 4 U van Suntum, Vorlesung KuB 4 KuB 4 4

  5. Central bankbalance (simplified) Assets Liabilities • currency in circulation • reserves • credit claims • bonds • foreign currency • other monetary base MB monetary base MB KuB 3.1 5 U van Suntum, Vorlesung KuB 5 KuB 4 5

  6. Velocity of circulation v in Euro-Zone (1980 – 2000) ln [GDPnom/M3] source: ECB KuB 3.1 6 U van Suntum, Vorlesung KuB 6 KuB 4 6

  7. Pure monetary theory by Ralph Hawtrey (1928) (I) • inventories are sensible to interest rate • Inventoryboughtat 1000.- • leveraged 900.- • equity: 100.- • inventorysoldat 1100.- • => Profit beforeinterest 100.- Rate of return (i = 11%): 1% Rate of return ( i = 10%): 10% KuB 3.1 7 U van Suntum, Vorlesung KuB 7 KuB 4 7

  8. Pure monetary theory by Ralph Hawtrey (1928) (II) • inventories are also sensible to inflation Interest rates decline Interest rates rise inventory and commodity demand increase Inflation Inflation rising velocity of money circulation (Hawtrey effect) KuB 3.1 8 U van Suntum, Vorlesung KuB 8 KuB 4 8

  9. Criticism on Hawtrey`s theory • Inventory less important today • Explanation of cycle is one-sided • Stimulus of initial interest rate decline unclear • However: leverage effect was relevant in recent financial crisis KuB 3.1 9 U van Suntum, Vorlesung KuB 9 KuB 4 9

  10. Monetary over-investment theory (Knut Wicksell 1922, F.A. von Hayek 1934 ) upswing downswing S + d(M/P) S S + d(M/P) S imon inat imon I I Interest rate spread causal for disparity between investment and consumption goods KuB 3.1 10 U van Suntum, Vorlesung KuB 10 KuB 4 10

  11. Criticism on Wicksell`s theory • Stimulus of initial interest rate spread unclear • Neglect of real effects (e.g. accelerator) • However: interest rate spread was also relevant in recent crisis KuB 3.1 11 U van Suntum, Vorlesung KuB 11 KuB 4 11

  12. Theories of under-consumption (Lauderdale, Malthus, Lederer) • technical progress and capital accumulation • pressure on wages and rising unemployment • sales crisis and depression • Critisicm: • real wage increasebytechnicalisprogressneglected • turningpointsare not sufficientlyexplained • onesidedtheory, no formal exposition • exportdemandneglected KuB 3.1 12 U van Suntum, Vorlesung KuB 12 KuB 4 12

  13. Non-monetary theory of excess investment (Aftalion u.a.) • Acceleratoreffect: • K/GDP = 300/100 • d = 10% • => D = 30 • supposedemandrisesat 10% in t1 • => I1 = 60  + 100% • I2 = 33  -45% • => extreme instability Aggregate Demand Investment • Criticism: • cause of initial rise in aggregate demand? • no formal exposition • one sided KuB 3.1 13 U van Suntum, Vorlesung KuB 13 KuB 4 13

  14. Accelerator effect in East German Housing Market After unification today previous Demand (110) adds (11) Demand (110) adds (1,1) Housing stock ./. outs (108,9) Demand (100) adds (1) Housing stock ./. outs (99) Housing stock ./. outs (99) • increase in aggregate demand by 10% => rise in investment by 1100% ! • after completed construction of new houses drop in investment KuB 3.1 14 U van Suntum, Vorlesung KuB 14 KuB 4 14

  15. Orders in East-German ConstructionIndustry KuB 3.1 15 U van Suntum, Vorlesung KuB 15 KuB 4 15

  16. Dynamics of the business cycle GDP Investment GDP Investment KuB 3.1 16 U van Suntum, Vorlesung KuB 16 KuB 4 16

  17. Is there an equilibrium of aggregate demand and investment? (Harrod-Domar 1939): Supply Demand KuB 3.1 17 U van Suntum, Vorlesung KuB 17

  18. Learning goals/Questions • How do we classify business cycle theories? • Which pre-Keynesian theories do we know? • To what extent are they still relevant today? • Explain why we cannot forecast GDP for more than two years at best! • Explain the Harrod-Domar condition for a balanced growth! KuB 3.1 18 U van Suntum, Vorlesung KuB 18 KuB 4 18

More Related