1 / 20

Hans H. K. Andersen and Steen Weber Risø National Laboratory

Evaluation of cooperation and communication during training using a distributed simulation system in the maritime domain. Hans H. K. Andersen and Steen Weber Risø National Laboratory. Training effects of a long distance learning s hip handling c ourse. Project objectives and partners.

codypatrick
Télécharger la présentation

Hans H. K. Andersen and Steen Weber Risø National Laboratory

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Evaluation of cooperation and communication during training using a distributed simulation system in the maritime domain Hans H. K. Andersen and Steen Weber Risø National Laboratory

  2. Training effects of a long distance learning shiphandling course

  3. Project objectives and partners • Objective • Enabling education and training in ship-handling, communication and co-operation using distributed networked simulators • Partners • Åland Maritime Institute (ÅM, - users)www.asl.aland.fi • RISØ National Laboratory (Risø, - human factors)www.risoe.dk • Force, Division of Maritime Industry (DMI, – developers, users)www.dmi-online.dk

  4. Distance learning • Lack of direct face-to- face contact does not necessarily affect the quality of the learning process • There is no evidence that face-to-face instruction is the best method of giving instruction • Learning at a distance can be as effective as learning in a face to face situation

  5. Fidelity of experimental setup • Communication as in real life (mixed nationalities, only communication through the simulated VHF radio. • Realistic models of the ship(s) > ships behaves as real ships • Realistic division of effort on the bridge and among the ships taking part in the SAR

  6. Experimental set-up • Preparation of detailed schedule • Briefing of trainees • Execution of training session (net based) • Subjectiveself evaluation by trainees (net based questionnaire) • Instructor controlled debriefing (net based)

  7. Experimental design

  8. Ship 1 (Risø) Ship 1 (Risø) Ship 2 (DMI) Ship 2 (DMI) Ship 3, ÅM Ship 3, ÅM Experimental scenario MayDay from capsized boat MayDay received Marine Rescue Center All other boats in the area On-scene commander (DMI) Search patterns

  9. Single display ”bridge”

  10. Video from experiment

  11. Multiple own ships - net requirements • During SAR exercise guarantied bandwidth • Communication of ship: • Positions • Speed • Visual appearance (lights, signals) • Sound • After SAR exercise high bandwidth • Debriefing based on instructor and student radio communication simultaneously with real-time simulation replay of scenario through the net

  12. VHF radio communication • Half duplex • Medium bandwidth requirement < 64 kBit/sec) per bridge

  13. Instructor station – debriefing replay

  14. Results - performance of equipment

  15. Results - the execution of the exercise

  16. Results - physical presence of instructor during and after exercise

  17. Results - quality of debriefing

  18. Results - learning experience

  19. Results - expected outcome using simulator based training

  20. Conclusion • High satisfaction with the performance of the tools and the set-up of the exercises • High satisfaction with the debriefing quality • Not important to have an instructor nearby • Satisfaction on SAR skill improvement • Education would highly benefit from having accessto distributed simulators (even from home)

More Related