1 / 14

Monitoring Grocott’s Policy:

Monitoring Grocott’s Policy:. Research Team : Thanduxolo Jika Modise Kabeli Thandy Kunene Susan Nakacwa Thando Sebesho. Research Aims:. To identify trends followed in monitoring policy To establish who is better placed for the responsibility of monitoring policy

Télécharger la présentation

Monitoring Grocott’s Policy:

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Monitoring Grocott’s Policy: Research Team: • Thanduxolo Jika • Modise Kabeli • Thandy Kunene • Susan Nakacwa • Thando Sebesho

  2. Research Aims: • To identify trends followed in monitoring policy • To establish who is better placed for the responsibility of monitoring policy • Provide propositions for monitoring Grocott’s policy

  3. Research Methods: Qualitative research: • Interviews • E-mails • In-depth (open ended) questions

  4. Findings: • Grocott’s does not have a formalized document that outlines who is responsible for monitoring policy • Only an arbitrary level of implementation of arbitrary policy decisions exists • Readers have been acting as watchdogs e.g. calling-in to complain about something published

  5. Grocott’s Organogram: Board of Directors Board of Advisors General Manager Adverts Editor Publishing

  6. Advisory Board: Advisory Board Members Editorial Policy Expert/s Financial Expert/s Legal Expert/s Other Expert/s Policy Awareness • Focus Groups • Media Campaigns • Public Meetings

  7. Recommendations: • There should be a Qualitative Review of each issue - this will help the editor monitor the quality of the newspaper, especially in the beginning stages. • The Review can be as simple as passing a copy of the newspaper to all people responsible for content & production, & asking them to mark criticisms and suggestions on the copy for all to see.

  8. Recommendations continued: Composition of the Advisory Board: • Should be representative - consist of members with diff. expertise, e.g authorities in the areas of law, finance, education, editorial policy, etc. - also, consist of different communities and social orientations in Grahamstown.

  9. Recommendations continued: Responsibilities: Advisory Board (Policy Expert/s): • create policy awareness through media campaigns, focus groups & public meetings. • Sit-in & mediate on meetings to solve conflict regarding policy matters. • Investigate, judge or punish those responsible for lapses

  10. Recommendations continued: Responsibilities: Editor: • clearly define & implement the editorial policy • establish procedures to maintain newspaper quality, • identify errors & problems, • detect trends & monitor possible failures that reflect a deterioration in quality, & • implement corrective actions as needed.

  11. Recommendations continued: Focus groups: • gather role players in all sectors for policy input • create policy awareness • review/assess adherence to policy - e.g. review articles on Grocott’s Mail for policy adherence.

  12. Recommendations continued: Radio broadcasts and press releases • For information broadcasts, awareness campaigns, creating a platform to call public meetings or give reminders e.g Radio Grahamstown, RMR and Grocott’s. • The radio stations will be mediums of giving feedback, responses and reminders.

  13. Recommendations continued: Public meetings • large scale meetings in different areas in Grahamstown. • should be recorded & have translators available for Xhosa or Afrikaans speakers. • Grocott’s Project e.g. GRAB – could use students on a voluntary basis

  14. Finally… The Board of Advisors will, on their bi-annual meetings, submit an audit of the qualitative review to the Board of Directors.

More Related