1 / 12

Modified Cos θ Coil

Modified Cos θ Coil. A new approach in Cos θ coil design to increase the uniformity of the B field. Riccardo Schmid, CIT. A Cos θ coil with fewer turns (20 vs. 40) produces a B field with a greater gradient (greater non-uniformity).

colleen-bell
Télécharger la présentation

Modified Cos θ Coil

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Modified Cosθ Coil A new approach in Cosθ coil design to increase the uniformity of the B field Riccardo Schmid, CIT

  2. A Cosθ coil with fewer turns (20 vs. 40) produces a B field with a greater gradient (greater non-uniformity). It is possible to achieve greater uniformity by combining the fields of two coils with different gradients Modified Cosθ Coil mGauss Plot of Bx(x) for Cosθ coil N=20 (black) N=40 (red) turns cm Prototype geometry (R=8.75cm, L=87.5cm)

  3. The main coil consists of a 40 turn Cosθ coil with current I1. The secondary coil consists of a 8 turn Cosθ coil with 2/5 the current in the main coil, running in the opposite direction. mGauss cm + cm mGauss Plot of Bx(x) for main Cosθ coil N=40 turns Plot of Bx(x) for secondary Cosθ coil N=8 turns with current I`= -2/5 I0

  4. The main coil consists of a 40 turn Cosθ coil with current I1. The secondary coil consists of a 8 turn Cosθ coil with 2/5 the current in the main coil, running in the opposite direction. mGauss Bx(x) Black: N=40 Cosθ coil Red: N=40-8 Modified Cosθ coil cm Plot of Bx(x) for Cosθ coil N=40 in black compared tomodified Cosθcoil 40-8 turns red (main coil N=40 turns, secondary coil N=8 turns) Prototype geometry (R=8.75cm, L=87.5cm)

  5. The main coil consists of a 40 turn Cosθ coil with current I1. The secondary coil consists of a 8 turn Cosθ coil with 2/5 the current in the main coil, running in the opposite direction. cm Bx(y) Black: N=40 Cosθ coil Red: N=40-8 Modified Cosθ coil mGauss Plot of Bx(y) for Cosθ coil N=40 in black compared tomodified Cosθcoil 40-8 turns red (main coil N=40 turns, secondary coil N=8 turns) Prototype geometry (R=8.75cm, L=87.5cm)

  6. The main coil consists of a 40 turn Cosθ coil with current I1. The secondary coil consists of a 8 turn Cosθ coil with 2/5 the current in the main coil, running in the opposite direction. mGauss Bx(z) Black: N=40 Cosθ coil Red: N=40-8 Modified Cosθ coil cm Plot of Bx(z) for Cosθ coil N=40 in black compared tomodified Cosθcoil 40-8 turns red (main coil N=40 turns, secondary coil N=8 turns) Prototype geometry (R=8.75cm, L=87.5cm)

  7. Δ Δ / 2 3Δ / 2 3Δ Simple Modification • It is possible to implement a secondary Cosθ coil without modifying the structure of the basic coil. • The secondary coil will have a number of turns equal to a divisor of the number of turns of the main coil by an odd number. • No additional grooves need to be machined • The current in the secondary coil can be implemented as current “missing” from the main. If the main coil is constructed by winding a wire multiple times, the secondary coil can be implemented by subtracting windings in some of the turns.

  8. The Volume Averaged Gradient calculations of the B field inside the fiducial volume show a lower Average Gradient for the N=40-8 coil <|dBx/dx|> calculated over a grid of points inside the fiducial volume for the prototype geometry Average Gradient Magnitude for different coils: N=20 <|dBx/dx|> = 53.988 nT/m N=40 <|dBx/dx|> = 15.531 nT/m N=40-8 <|dBx/dx|> = 2.184 nT/m For N=40-8 Gradient sign changes inside the fiducial volume: N=40-8 < dBx/dx > = .668 nT/m (not magnitude of gradient) Gradient Calculations Prototype geometry (R=8.75cm, L=87.5cm)

  9. Gradient Calculations nT/m N=20 <|dBx/dx|> = 53.988 nT/m

  10. Gradient Calculations nT/m N=40 <|dBx/dx|> = 15.531 nT/m

  11. Gradient Calculations nT/m N=40-8 <|dBx/dx|> = 2.184 nT/m

  12. The End? • Modified Cosθ coil N=40-8 seems to offer a smaller gradient compared to N=40 in the region of interest (fiducial volume) • Simple implementation in existing prototypes (N=40 at Caltech) • Increase in the current necessary to drive both coils at original B field is small (<10% increase) To do: • Measurement of the field on prototype • Calculations for new geometry L/R~6.4 (current calculation L/R=10) • Possible optimization varying secondary coil current ratio (now -2/5), number of secondary coil turns (currently 8) • Monte Carlo simulation of geometric phase

More Related