1 / 24

Role of particle interactions in high-energy astrophysics

Role of particle interactions in high-energy astrophysics. Uncorrelated fluxes Hadronic interactions Air showers. Particle interactions for cosmic rays . Atmosphere Nuclear targets Nuclear projectiles Forward region High energy “Minimum bias” Limited guidance from accelerator data

consuelo
Télécharger la présentation

Role of particle interactions in high-energy astrophysics

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Role of particle interactions in high-energy astrophysics Uncorrelated fluxes Hadronic interactions Air showers Thomas K. Gaisser

  2. Particle interactions for cosmic rays • Atmosphere • Nuclear targets • Nuclear projectiles • Forward region • High energy • “Minimum bias” • Limited guidance from accelerator data • Astrophysics • Astrophysical uncertainties are more severe Thomas K. Gaisser

  3. Particle production: two scenarios • Inject beam of particles • follow secondary cascades in target • Earth or stellar atmosphere • Inject particles from cosmic accelerators • diffuse in low-density gas • occasional interactions Thomas K. Gaisser

  4. Equation for change in particle i in delta distance Primary particles from all directions per unit sphere Basic formulation Thomas K. Gaisser

  5. Example: production of diffuse g in ISM Thomas K. Gaisser

  6. p0 2 g in diffuse ISM Thomas K. Gaisser

  7. Diffuse galactic g spectrum High-energy spectrum flatter than 2.7. Possible contribution from interactions with source spectrum? Thomas K. Gaisser

  8. Cascades in the atmosphere

  9. Unstable hadrons: interaction or decay? • Decay length, p+/- : gctp (cm) • in (g/cm2)  dp = rgctp = rEptpc / mpc2 • lp = dp defines rcritical = 0.018 (lp / 100 g/cm2) / Ep • Earth’s atmosphere at X = 100 g/cm2 : r ~ 10-4 • this density exceeds rcritical when Ep > ep, • where ep ~ 115 GeV: Ep > ep, interaction > decay • Around astrophysical acceleration sites • r < rcritical even for very high Ep Thomas K. Gaisser

  10. Boundary conditions & scaling • Air shower, primary of mass A, energy E0 : • N(X=0) = A d (E- E0 /A) for nucleons • N(X=0) = 0 for all other particles • Uncorrelated flux from power-law spectrum: • N(X=0) = fp(E) = K E-(g+1) • ~ 1.7 E-2.7 ( cm-2 s-1 sr-1 GeV-1 ), top of atmosphere • Fji( Ei,Ej) has no explicit dimension, F  F(x) • x = Ei/Ej &∫…F(Ei,Ej) dEj / Ei  ∫…F(x) dx / x2 • Expect scaling violations from mi, LQCD ~ GeV Thomas K. Gaisser

  11. Example: flux of nucleons l ~ constant, leading nucleon only Separate X- and E-dependence; try factorized solution, N(E,X) = f(E) g(X): Separation constant LN describes attenuation of nucleons in atmosphere Uncorrelated fluxes in atmosphere

  12. Evaluate LN: Flux of nucleons: K fixed by primary spectrum at X = 0 Nucleon fluxes in atmosphere Thomas K. Gaisser

  13. Account for p  n CAPRICE98 (E. Mocchiutti, thesis) Comparison to proton fluxes

  14. Primary spectrum of nucleons • Plot shows • 5 groups of nuclei • plotted as nucleons • Heavy line is E-2.7 fit to protons Thomas K. Gaisser

  15. Production spectrum of p± at high energy: Decay probability per g/cm2 m production spectrum: Note extra power of 1/E for E >> ep = 115 GeV p±  m± in the atmosphere Thomas K. Gaisser

  16. Comparison to measured m flux • High-energy analysis • o.k. for Em > TeV • Low-energy: • dashed line neglects m decay and energy loss • solid line includes an analytic approximation of deday and energy loss by muons Thomas K. Gaisser

  17. Uncertainties for uncorrelated spectra • p  K+L gives dominant contribution to atmospheric neutrino flux for En > 100 GeV • p  charm gives dominant contribution to neutrino flux for En > 10 or 100 or ? TeV • Important as background for diffuse astrophysical neutrino flux because of harder spectrum Thomas K. Gaisser

  18. Calculations of air showers • Cascade programs • Corsika: full air-shower simulation is the standard • Hybrid calculations: • CASC (R. Engel, T. Stanev et al.) uses libraries of presimulated showers at lower energy to construct a higher-energy event • SENECA (H-J. Drescher et al.) solves CR transport Eq. numerically in intermediate region • Event generators plugged into cascade codes: • DPMjet, QGSjet, SIBYLL, VENUS, Nexus Thomas K. Gaisser

  19. 1 x1 x2 s12 = x1x2s = 2mx1x2Elab > few GeV resolves quarks/gluons in target; Gluon structure function: g(x) ~ (1/x2)p, p ~ 0.2 …. 0.4 E1 E3 E2 Hadronic interactions at UHE • Scaling assumption for fast secondaries is equivalent to assuming distribution of final state radiation from leading di-quark is independent of beam energy • At higher energy more complex interactions may be important Thomas K. Gaisser

  20. {…} is probability of at least one interaction at impact parameter b s is nucleon-nucleon cross section T(b) is number of target nucleons at impact parameter b sN is partial cross section for N wounded nucleons Geometrical model of p-A interactions Thomas K. Gaisser

  21. Wounded nucleons & inelasticity Mean number of wounded nucleons: spA ~ A⅔ , so <Nw> ~ A⅓ ZNN(air) = P1∫ x1.7 dx + P2 ∫ x1.7 log(1/x) dx + ½ P3 ∫ x1.7 [log(1/x)]2 dx ≈ 0.3 Thomas K. Gaisser

  22. x1 x2 s12 = x1x2s = 2mx1x2Elab > few GeV resolves quarks/gluons in target; Gluon structure function: g(x2) ~ (1/x2)p, p ~ 0.2 …. 0.4 E1 E3 E2 Analogy of pp and p-nucleus physics • If Atarget = Atarget(E) then • NW would increase with E • Inelasticity ≡ 1 - <x(E)> would also increase ~ A⅓ • Something like this happens with pp collisions (M. Strikman, R. Engel) • Amount of scaling violation is uncertain Thomas K. Gaisser

  23. HiRes new composition result: transition occurs before ankle G. Archbold, P. Sokolsky, et al., Proc. 28th ICRC, Tsukuba, 2003 Model-dependence of Xmax Sybil 2.1 (some screening of gluons at small x) QGSjet (strong increase of gluon multiplicity at small x) • Xmax ~ l log(E0 / A) with scaling • With increase of inelasticity, • Primary energy is further subdivided: • Xmax ~ l log{ E0 / (A * (1 - <x(E)>) ) }

  24. 1 Inelasticity 0 17 15 16 18 19 Example of increasing inelasticity Effect is limited because energy not carried by leading nucleon is divided among pions, which divide the remaining energy, as in scaling. Such a large change would have a significant effect on interpretation -in terms of composition -of energy in a ground array

More Related