1 / 15

ECFA – Physics Goals … group 2 nd meeting

ECFA – Physics Goals … group 2 nd meeting. Chris, Gavin and Leandro May 31 st. Some notes from last SC meeting. We're expected to give a 30' talk (+10' discussion) covering: Proposed agenda of our session at the October Workshop Detailed outline of the presentations

corbin
Télécharger la présentation

ECFA – Physics Goals … group 2 nd meeting

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. ECFA – Physics Goals … group2nd meeting Chris, Gavin and Leandro May 31st

  2. Some notes from last SC meeting • We're expected to give a 30' talk (+10' discussion) covering: • Proposed agenda of our session at the October Workshop • Detailed outline of the presentations • Status of availability of the required material • Next steps • We think that our report has been well received. Based on the feedback we got, most likely we should have in our Session four central talks: 1) Higgs physics, 2) BSM searches 3) Heavy Flavourand 4) Heavy Ions. • Probably we want to cover Vector Boson Scattering in 1) • It has been suggest to consider a specific talk on requirement from physics to detector and trigger. This could be an additional important talk • All points covered by this bulleted item are meant to be *starting ideas* for next PG1 meeting (date/time to be decided). • One question we got is on HI: it would be good to know from HI colleagues and idea on how much p-p collision reference data is needed • Last but not least: interconnect/merge the “Theory” and “Physics Goals…” sessions

  3. Proposed Agenda & “Theory & Physics Goals…” session [for discussion] • Introduction – 15’ • Higgs boson precision measurements and VBS 40’ • New Physics searches: SUSY, ExtraDimensions, etc; 40’ • Requirements to Trigger, Detector and Physics objects performance 30’ • Heavy Flavour [LHCb speaker] 25’ • Heavy Ion [ALICE speaker] 25’ • Theory considerations relevant for HL-LHC are presented in each talk (except 4) • The Introduction is a talk that presents the structure of the session and gives the main message on the physics case for HL-LHC

  4. Detailed outline of the presentations • We should start discussing this today • Probably we should give at least the main points that we want to cover in each talk

  5. Higgs & VBS: an example • Higgs couplings • Includes SM measurements to reduce theory uncerainty, egconstrain PDFs • includes rare decays • Higgs selfcoupling • Higgs spin and CP • VBS: sensitivity studies to detect non-SM contribution from VV invariant mass analysis • Example: VBS WW  lnlnqq

  6. BSM searches: an example • Third generation squark searches • Electroweak gaugino searches • (Squark and gluino searches) • Heavy resonance decays to ttbar, leptons, … (Discuss with Andreas Weiler)

  7. Heavy Flavour talk (1) • Propose a talk on HF physics for ECFA workshop • Suggest an LHCb speaker for this contribution • Cover not only b, c & τ, but also t FCNC decays and lepton flavour violation • Emphasize synergies between LHCb & GPDs • Focus on HL-LHC era i.e. post-LS3 – recall LHCb upgrade starts post-LS2 • Not useful to discuss in terms of Lint • 1/fb @ LHCb 1/fb ≠ @ ATLAS/CMS • Instead consider calendar year, or LHC run period, with certain assumptions • Material for LHCb upgrade available at CERN-LHCC-2011-001 and arXiv:1208.3355 – update for w/s based on latest information

  8. Heavy Flavourtalk (2) • Consider performance vs. time for (for example) • B(B0→μ+μ–)/B(Bs0→μ+μ–) LHCb, ATLAS & CMS • Precision SM and MFV test • φs(Bs0→φφ)LHCb • Search for NP causing CPV in loops • CKM angle γLHCb (Belle2) • Crucial input for precision CKM fits • AΓ (D0→K+K– & π+π–)LHCb (Belle2) • Search for CPV in charm mixing – SM null test • τ→μμμLHCb (Belle2, ATLAS & CMS?) • Lepton flavour violation • t→cγ, cμμ & ceeATLAS & CMS • FCNC top decays – SM null test

  9. Heavy Ions • Propose a talk on HI physics plans and goals for RUN3 • Suggest an ALICE speaker for such a report • Also in this case, encourage synergy between ALICE and ATLAS+CMS • Main items in the proposed report: • (very) Low pT Heavy Flavor, charmonium production (mainly ALICE) • Heavy quark diffusion in in QGP ( -> equation of state); heavy quark thermalization and in-medium hadronization • Important to measure precisely (few % level) the J/ψ and ψ’ production down to zero pT, and to perform this as a function of eta • Upsilon family production (ALICE, ATLAS and CMS) • (very) Low-mass dileptons (ALICE) • photons from QGP, γ to e+e-, map temperature during system evolution • Modification of ρ spectral function (ρ to e+e-) -> chiral symmetry restoration • Jet physics: fragmentation functions in QGP, flavor dependent (ALICE, ATLAS and CMS); high-pT production (mainly ATLAS and CMS)

  10. Available material • The European Strategy documents submitted by ATLAS and CMS • The MC samples and the ES functions used by ATLAS • The system put in place by CMS for projecting current data/MC results to HL-LHC • The HI & HF studies submitted for European Strategy • ALICE/ATLAS/CMS/LHCb Upgrade documents ATLAS: • Useful info on trigger rates @ 7x1034 • Very useful information on ITK performance • Transverse momentum resolution as a function of (pT,eta) • Efficiencies as a function of fucntion of (pT,eta) with p.u. for muonspions and electrons • B-tagging with p.u. • Recent effort (ongoing) for Snowmass

  11. Channels suggested for full simulation • HHbbgammagamma • Hμ+μ− • HZgamma • VBF H ττ • VB Scattering • a channel from BSM We should choose one/few of them (not all!)

  12. some ideas on the “strategy” • Revisit European Strategy findings with what learnt in recent full simulation studies (eg Upgrade work) • Benefit from Snowmass preparation • We should focus to results with detector response close to ATLAS/CMS • Pay attention also to findings from more generic (and more optimistic?) simulations • Validate with full simulation the “smearing fucntions” used for ES (ATLAS) • Consider one (a few?) channels that we want to perform in full simulation • Study these also in fast simulation: it will be very important to know how results from fast simulation compare with those from full • Question: the same channel for ATLAS and CMS (improves robustness of the result) or two different channels (expand the physics output)?

  13. appendix

More Related