1 / 40

Perception for visualization: From design to evaluation

Perception for visualization: From design to evaluation. Victoria Interrante, U. Minn. Haim Levkowitz (chair), IVPR, UMass Lowell Hans-Peter Meinzer, DKFZ-Heidelberg, Germany. Overview. Purpose of collecting information Constantly growing ... Need to understand how to ... Challenges …

cortez
Télécharger la présentation

Perception for visualization: From design to evaluation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Perception for visualization: From design to evaluation Victoria Interrante, U. Minn. Haim Levkowitz (chair), IVPR, UMass Lowell Hans-Peter Meinzer, DKFZ-Heidelberg, Germany

  2. Overview • Purpose of collecting information • Constantly growing ... • Need to understand how to ... • Challenges … • Examples ...

  3. Purpose of collecting information • Present it to • Analyze it by • Human beings • Constantly growing: amounts & complexity ...

  4. Constantly growing ... • Amounts collected • Complexity • Information • Analysis • Need to understand how to ...

  5. Need to understand how to ... • Increase comprehension • Make analysis easier & efficient

  6. A presentation … • An experience, not just an image ... • Aimed at humans • Has to be designed ...

  7. An experience, not just an image ... • User-directed, dynamic • Multidisciplinary … • Multisensory ...

  8. Multidisciplinary ... • Graphics • Imaging • Psychology • Man-machine interface • Databases • Multimedia

  9. Multisensory ... • Visual • Auditory • Tactile • More?

  10. Has to be designed ... • Audience • Question(s) / tasks ... • Contents • Delivery

  11. Question(s) / tasks ... • Explore vs. Confirm • E.g., detection vs. identification

  12. Perceptually-based presentation … • Make perceptually effective … • How? ...

  13. Make perceptually effective … • Understand perceptual processes … • Harness them ...

  14. Understand perceptual processes ... • Color • Size • Shape • Texture • Motion • Sound

  15. Harness them ... • Data "Speak" for themselves • Exploratory vs. confirmatory analyses • Raise dimensionality • MDMV

  16. How? ... • Substitute pre-conscious for conscious • Pre-conscious … • Conscious ...

  17. Pre-conscious ... • Do not interfere with ability to think • Parallel • Hard-wired/entrained • Fast • Relentless • Simultaneously w/conscious analysis

  18. Conscious ... • Interfere • Serial • Ad-hoc • Slow • Cause fatigue • Distract from higher level analysis

  19. Challenges … • Understand "perception" ... • Apply perception ... • Truth and accuracy obligation … • Effectiveness • Evaluation and verification ...

  20. Understand "perception" ... • Lower-level vision (also audition, touch) • Perception … • Cognition … • Aesthetics • Emotional & cultural

  21. Perception ... • Color • Shape • Size • Texture • Motion • Segmentation

  22. Cognition ... • Attention (pre-attentive vs. scrutiny; preconscious vs. conscious) • Memory (iconic, short term, long term) • Semantics & symbolism

  23. Apply perception ... • ==> Perceptually-based • Representations … • Rules & guidelines … • Interaction • ==> Presentations

  24. Representations ... • E.g., generalize pixels fi more info • Visual • Color • Geometry … • Motion • Sound

  25. Geometry ... • Line orientation • Area • Volume • Curvature • Texture

  26. Rules & guidelines ... • Contrast • Color • Font • Size • Style

  27. Truth and accuracy obligation ... • Informing vs. entertaining • Comprehension vs. aesthetics • Informing ==> as truthful as possible • Avoid misleading viewers • E.g., Brooks (Vis '93): background music ...

  28. E.g., Brooks (Vis '93): background music ... • What message? • Lower SNR, unless • Intentional • Accurate • Show business

  29. Evaluation and verification … • Tasks … • Data ...

  30. Tasks ... • Presence / absence • Edge / boundary • Target / blob • Location • Classification

  31. Data ... • Real … • Synthesized ...

  32. Real ... • "Truth" unknown • E.g., • Satellite • Water vs. land • Medical • Normal vs. abnormal

  33. Synthesized ... • "Truth" known • Statistics • Not real

  34. Examples ... • Medical • Earth science • Reconnaissance • Presentations

  35. Conclusions ... • What is information presentation • Perceptually-based information presentation • Design • Evaluation & verification • Challenges • Examples

  36. Moral ... • Present to inform, not to impress; if you inform, you will impress after Fred Brooks Keynote Address Visualization ’93

  37. Emerging discipline • Eick: "Graphically displaying text" • J. Comp. & Graphical Statistics • Four progress stages … • Wong & Bergeron, 1995: "30 years of MDMV Vis” • Four stages of MDMV Vis. Development ...

  38. Four progress stages ... • Skilled artisans: Craft • Practical experience guidelines • Researchers: Scientific principles & theories • Engineers: Production rules • Widely available technology

  39. Four stages of MDMV Vis. Development ... • Pre-1976: The Searching Stage • 1977-1985: The Awakening Stage • 1986-1991: The Discovery Stage • 1992-present: The Elaboration Stage

  40. Tutorial overview • Levkowitz: Vision & color; evaluation and verification • Interrante: Visual perception; cognitive issues • Meinzer: Perception in image generation and understanding • Summary, discussions, future directions

More Related