1 / 16

Alexander Stoyanov Center for the Study of Democracy Sofia, Bulgaria csd.bg

Monitoring Implementation: Strategy and Program for Good Governance and Prevention and Countering Corruption (2006-2008). Alexander Stoyanov Center for the Study of Democracy Sofia, Bulgaria www.csd.bg. Goals of the System of Indicators.

costilla
Télécharger la présentation

Alexander Stoyanov Center for the Study of Democracy Sofia, Bulgaria csd.bg

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Monitoring Implementation:Strategy and Program for Good Governanceand Prevention and Countering Corruption (2006-2008) Alexander Stoyanov Center for the Study of Democracy Sofia, Bulgaria www.csd.bg

  2. Goals of the System of Indicators • To monitor implementation of the specific measures envisioned in the Program; • To monitors progress in achieving the specific goals of the Strategy; • To assess the impact of the Strategy and the Program on the level of corruption; • To assess the overall sustainability of the Strategy and the relevance of the measures of the Program to the good governance.

  3. Principles of the System of Indicators • To use methods and indicators that have already been nationally and internationally verified and have proven effective; • To address key problem areas identified in the Strategy; • To use different sources of information and methods of assessment; • To enable regular monitoring of changes in the spread of corruption; • To ensure comparability of the information on Bulgaria with that on the other European countries; • To help assemble an extensive collection of information with the results of assessments and the conducted monitoring.

  4. Evaluation and Analysis Methods

  5. Research Methods • Expert opinions (assessments and analyses by independent experts and representatives of non-governmental organizations); • Self-assessment by the institutions and agencies involved in the implementation of the Strategy and Program; • Analysis of data from official statistical surveys, agency information systems, national and international surveys; • National representative surveys of the population and the business community; • Surveys of the users of administrative, social, health and education services (Service Delivery Survey ) • Mystery Customer Surveys for various services; • Monthly monitoring of publications in the press, radio and television.

  6. System of Indicators

  7. I. Indicators for assessment of the implementation progress of the specific measures laid down in the Program • Availability of elaborated laws, programs, analyses, research methodologies, proposals, plans, publicly announced measures, etc; • Relevance of the measure adopted; • Timeframe compliance or non-compliance; • Implementation progress; • Quality of the elaborated laws, programs, analyses, research methodologies, proposals, plans, measures and etc. • Quantitative indicatorsmeasuring the outcomes of the adopted measure; • Effectiveness of the measure adopted .

  8. II. Level of Achievement of Strategy Objectives Main priorities of corruption monitoring system(CMS) : • Successfully working monitoring system, recognized as best practice national system for measuring administrative corruption levels; • The availability of extensive database of indicators allowing to track the evolution over time; • Coherent with the victimization approach to measuring corruption of the United Nations.

  9. Main CMS Indicators • Corruption victimization; • Corruption pressure; • Public attitudes towards corruption; • Spread of corruption; • Intolerance of corruption; • Factors of corruption; • Government anticorruption activities; • Access to information.

  10. III. Assessment of the Public Services Delivery • Number of documents required for delivery of the respective administrative service; • Time spent on filling in documents; • Availability of instructions for submitting the documents needed to initiate the administrative procedures; • Total duration of the procedure from submitting the documents to the final decision; • Staff quality and competence; • Service quality.

  11. Corruption Monitoring System Results (1998-2007)

  12. Average monthly number of corruption transactions (2001-2007) Source: Vitosha Research

  13. Dynamic of indexes of the level of corruption June 1998 - January 2007 Source: Vitosha Research

  14. Dynamics of the indexes of the level of corruption for the business sector (October 2000 - January 2007) Source: Vitosha Research

  15. Prerequisites for the existence of corruption (min=0, max=10) Source: Vitosha Research

  16. Average monthly number of corruption-related items in the media Source: Vitosha Research

More Related