1 / 34

▪ Educational Program - History - Automotive Options ▪ Practice Fields - Construction Phasing

Agenda – Rebuild Stafford High School. ▪ Educational Program - History - Automotive Options ▪ Practice Fields - Construction Phasing - Construction Options - Relocation Options. School Campus Site Plan. ▪ Educational Program. Educational Program – Rebuild Stafford High School.

coty
Télécharger la présentation

▪ Educational Program - History - Automotive Options ▪ Practice Fields - Construction Phasing

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Agenda – Rebuild Stafford High School ▪ Educational Program - History - Automotive Options • ▪ Practice Fields • - Construction Phasing • - Construction Options • - Relocation Options

  2. School Campus Site Plan

  3. ▪ Educational Program

  4. Educational Program – Rebuild Stafford High School • FY12- 17 CIP Development (Feb 2011) • Used HS 2010 Building & SHS Site Cost Estimate • HS 2010 = 267,561 Gross SF • CTE Programs included (No Automotive) • Detailed Development of Educational Program • April – July, 2011 • Majority of program similar to HS2010 • CTE - Compared HS2010 to SHS Program • Could not replicate entire program

  5. Educational Program – Rebuild Stafford High School • HS @ Cliff Farm 267,561 SF • Current SHS 287,836 SF • Difference 20,275 SF Rebuild Cost Estimate Taken from this Project for CIP

  6. Educational Program – Rebuild Stafford High School

  7. Educational Program – Rebuild Stafford High School • SB Approved September 27, 2011 • Information Meetings July 12, 2011 • August 9, 2011 • September 13, 2011 • Work Session September 13, 2011 • Presentation May 8, 2012 • *All Information Posted on Web Site

  8. Educational Program – Rebuild Stafford High School • Automotive Program Requirement for SHS • 9,000 SF Facility • 6 Lifts • 2 Classrooms • Lockers, Toilets and Storage • Options: • #1 - Replace Current Program Space • #2 - Add to Main HS Building • #3 - Detached Building on Campus • #4 - No Change from Approved Program

  9. Educational Program – Rebuild Stafford High School • Option #1 - Replace 9,000 SF of Current Program Space with Automotive Program • Pros: • Restores Automotive Program • Cons: • Adds an estimated $150K for redesign & $750K for construction • Delays school opening 1 year (Sep 2016) • Will reduce CTE and/or Core Programs

  10. Educational Program – Rebuild Stafford High School • Option #2 - Add 9,000 SF to New HS Main Building • Pros: • Restores Automotive Program • Cons: • Adds an estimated $4M for design & construction • Re-siting of building • Delays school opening 1 year (Sep 2016)

  11. Educational Program – Rebuild Stafford High School • Option #3 - Add 9,000 SF as a Detached Building on School Campus • Pros: • Restores Automotive Program • Proposed siting close to CTE Wing • Maintains current construction schedule • Cons: • Adds an Estimated $3.5M - $4M for design & construction • Reduces parking spots in staff parking • Change Order to Construction Contract

  12. OPTION 1 PROS: ⦁ Able to provide a façade that matches and responds to proposed building. ⦁ Closer to proposed CTE program. CONS: ⦁ Lose 64 parking spaces (161 to 97 spaces). ⦁ Tighter turning radius for access to Lab.

  13. PROS: ⦁ Lose only 46 parking spaces (161 to 115 spaces). ⦁ Comfortable turning radius for access to Lab. CONS: ⦁ Garage doors on façade may be visible from school. ⦁ Farther away from proposed CTE program. OPTION 2

  14. Educational Program – Rebuild Stafford High School • Option #4 - No Change from Approved SHS Educational Program (No Automotive Program @ SHS) • Maximize Lab use at Brooke Point & North Stafford, and use Germanna Space • Change Travel Allocation #’s to transport to 3 sites – BPHS, NSHS & GCC • SCPS can service 160 students for Auto Tech I and 80 students for Auto Tech II/III (Max 240), if we use both the labs at NSHS and BPHS all four blocks – this would mean utilizing a floating teacher to teach one block at each school. • GCC could service 40 students for Auto Tech I and 40 students for Auto Tech II/III – Max 80 *The current # of students enrolled in Auto Tech I, II & III at all three participating schools within the division is 275 (Levels II & III are taught in a double block).

  15. Educational Program – Rebuild Stafford High School Stafford High School Automotive Student Enrollment (2012-13)

  16. ▪ Practice Fields

  17. Relocation of Athletic Team Practices • SHS Construction Challenges • Building on Existing Campus • SHS Remains Operational • Environmental Constraints • Phased Construction

  18. Relocation of Athletic Team Practices • Option #1 – (Current Plan) • Phase I – Main Building • Phase II – Building Demo, Parking Lots and Fields • Balanced Site – No off Site Soil Hauling

  19. Relocation of Athletic Team Practices

  20. Relocation of Athletic Team Practices • Option #2 • Phase I – Main Building & Fields • Phase II – Building Demo and Parking Lot • Non Balanced Site • Soil import during Phase I • Soil export during Phase II • Estimated additional cost $3M

  21. Relocation of Athletic Team Practices

  22. Relocation of Athletic Team Practices • Assuming Phased Construction with Practice Fields Constructed in Phase II • Maximize existing field use • Maintain current Academic Program • Limit off site busing of students • Provide equivalent practice opportunities

  23. Relocation of Athletic Team Practices • Ground Truth: All Team practices can be accommodated on the existing SHS Campus or at their current locations with the exception of the following: • Fall: Football (Varsity, JV & Freshman) • Spring: Soccer (Boys Varsity & JV) • Spring: Lacrosse (Varsity & JV) • Spring: Tennis (B/G Varsity)

  24. Relocation of Athletic Team Practices • Ground Truth: All proposed options require boys/girls Tennis to be relocated off campus • Option A – Install Turf Field • Option B – Stagger practice times on existing fields • Option C – Stagger practice times on existing fields w/Chichester Park • Option D – Cliff Farm • Option E – Relocation displaced practices off campus

  25. Relocation of Athletic Team Practices • OptionsA – Turf Field • B/G Tennis off site @ BPHS & CFHS • Lacrosse - Competition Football Field Spring 2013 • Convert Football Field to Turf Field (Jun 15 – Aug 1) • Includes expansion of track (8 Lanes) • Cost = $1.5M • Fall: Football Practice - Turf Field & Baseball/Softball Fields • Spring: Boys Soccer and Lacrosse - Turf Field (stagger practice times)

  26. Relocation of Athletic Team Practices • OptionsA – Turf Field • Pros: • Keeps 95% of team practices on Campus • Installs All Weather Turf Field • Expands SHS track to 8 lanes • Cons: • Additional $1.5M for Turf Field Project • Summer construction will be tight • Staggered practice times in Spring • Baseball/Softball Fields used for Football in Fall • Limited Fall Baseball/Softball

  27. Relocation of Athletic Team Practices • OptionsB – NO TURF FIELD; Staggered Practice Times on Existing Fields • B/G Tennis off site @ BPHS & CFHS • Fall: Football Practice – Competition Football & Baseball/Softball Fields • Spring: Lacrosse – Competition Football Field (stagger practice times) • Spring: Boys Soccer – Competition Football Field and/or Field Hockey Field (stagger practice times)

  28. Relocation of Athletic Team Practices • Options B – NO TURF FIELD; Staggered Practice Times on Existing Fields • Pros: • Keeps 95% of team practices on Campus • Cons: • Field Conditions will be Poor • Practice & Games • Weather will have compounding effect • Requires $60 - $80K per year for Field Maintenance • Staggered practice times in Spring • Baseball/Softball Fields used for Football in Fall • Limited Fall Baseball/Softball

  29. Relocation of Athletic Team Practices • OptionsC – Stagger Practice Times on Existing Field & Use Chichester Park • B/G Tennis off site @ BPHS & CFHS • Fall: Football Practice • Competition Football & Baseball/Softball Fields 2013 • Spring: Lacrosse • Competition Football Field (stagger practice times) 2013 • Competition Football Field 2014 - 2016 • Spring: Boys Soccer • Competition Football/Field Hockey Fields (stagger practice times) 2013 • Chichester Park 2014 - 2016

  30. Relocation of Athletic Team Practices • Options C - Stagger Practice Times on Existing Field & Use Chichester Park • Pros: • Keeps 95% of team practices on Campus • Cons: • Field Conditions will be Poor • Practice & Games • Weather will have compounding effect • Requires $60 - $80K per year for Field Maintenance • Staggered practice times in Spring 2013 • Baseball/Softball Fields used for Football in Fall • Limited Fall Baseball/Softball • Park Field used for Soccer

  31. Relocation of Athletic Team Practices • OptionsD – Build Fields @ Cliff Farm • B/G Tennis Off Site @ BPHS & CFHS • Fall: Football Practice – Cliff Farm • Spring: Lacrosse – Cliff Farm • Spring: Boys Soccer – Cliff Farm

  32. Relocation of Athletic Team Practices • Options D – Build Fields @ Cliff Farm • Pros: • All Displaced Practices @ One Location • Cons: • Requires Construction Project Spring/Summer 2013 • 2 Fields w/Temp Parking - $300K • Irrigation - $100K • No Support Facilities • No Potable Water • Requires $40K for annual Field Maintenance • Estimated $50K to bus students off-on Campus/Year • Requires scheduling late Activities Bus • Could impact future school construction

  33. Relocation of Athletic Team Practices • OptionsE – Relocated Displaced Practices Off Campus • B/G Tennis Off Site @ BPHS & CFHS • Fall: Football Practice – Gari Melchers • Spring: Lacrosse • Gari Melchers 2013 • DSMS 2014 - 2016 • Spring: Boys Soccer – GMS

  34. Relocation of Athletic Team Practices • Options E – Relocate Displaced Practices Off Campus • Pros: • Practices held in the Attendance Zone & at SCPS Facilities • Existing Competition Fields @ SHS are not over stressed • Cons: • Practices will be delayed 45 minutes after school for tutoring opportunities • Estimated $50K to bus students off-on Campus/Year • Requires scheduling late Activities Bus

More Related