1 / 7

IE 419 Work Design: Productivity and Safety Dr. Andris Freivalds Class #40

IE 419 Work Design: Productivity and Safety Dr. Andris Freivalds Class #40. Case Study - Pneumatic Nailers. Advantages Operation: Trigger trip vs. Yoke-trip (bump mode) Weight/size Standards: ANSI/ISANTA SNT-101-1983 OSHA 1910.243, 29 CFR 1926.300. Litigation Process.

craig
Télécharger la présentation

IE 419 Work Design: Productivity and Safety Dr. Andris Freivalds Class #40

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. IE 419 Work Design:Productivity and Safety Dr. Andris Freivalds Class #40 IE 419

  2. Case Study - Pneumatic Nailers • Advantages • Operation: • Trigger trip vs. • Yoke-trip (bump mode) • Weight/size • Standards: • ANSI/ISANTA SNT-101-1983 • OSHA 1910.243, 29 CFR 1926.300 IE 419

  3. Litigation Process • Accident/injury • Plaintiff hires lawyer, files suit • Defense hires lawyer • Cross evaluations of evidence (discovery) • Pre-trial depositions • Out-of-court settlement? IE 419

  4. Goes to Court - Trial • Qualification of experts • Direct examination • Cross examination • Re-direct, re-cross • Expert witnesses - ethical considerations ✓ ‘hired gun’ ✓ sterile vs. interested ✓ take cases you don’t believe in? ✓ negative comments on opposing colleagues ✓ opinion vs. fact IE 419

  5. Specific Cases • Duo-Fast vs. Condella - setting windows, head injury, no hard hats/safety glasses • Atro vs. Edwards - framing, back injury, no hard hats/safety glasses • Duo-Fast vs. Schmidt - deck joists, self-inflicted leg injury IE 419

  6. Plaintiff Allegations • Tool weight depresses yoke/trigger • Trigger/handle design invites activation • Mechanical lockout necessary • Eliminate bump mode • Warnings deficient • Increase trigger/yoke force IE 419

  7. Defense Answers • Tool weight < than yoke/trigger force • Tool to be disconnected during transport • Increasing trigger force causes other dangers (CTD injuries) • Elimination of bump mode decreases productivity (need for tool) • Risk vs. productivity • Warnings vs. good practice/training IE 419

More Related