1 / 39

Pre-requisites for quantum computation

Pre-requisites for quantum computation. Collection of two-state quantum systems ( qubits ). time. Initialise qubit to single state. Detect qubit state. Operations which manipulate isolated qubits or pairs of qubits. Large scale device:.

cullen
Télécharger la présentation

Pre-requisites for quantum computation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Pre-requisites for quantum computation Collection of two-state quantum systems (qubits) time Initialise qubit to single state Detect qubit state Operations which manipulate isolated qubits or pairs of qubits Large scale device: Transport information around processor/distribute entangled states Perform operations accurately enough to achieve fault-tolerant error-correction (accuracy ~ 0.9999 required)

  2. Ion trap (NIST John Jost) DC RF RF RF ground DC RF RF RF ground

  3. Isolatingsinglechargedatoms Laplace‘sequation – nochancetotrapwithstaticfields Paul trap: Use a ponderomotive potential – change potential fast comparedtospeedofion Time average - Effective potential energywhichis minimal atminimumE

  4. DC RF RF electrode Traps – traditional style Axial potential gives almost ideal harmonic behaviour n = 2 n = 1 n = 0

  5. Multi-levelatoms 40Ca+ - fine structure 9Be+ - hyperfine structure (16 Hyperfine states)

  6. Requirement: longdecay time forupperlevel.

  7. Storing qubits in an atom - phasecoherence Problem: noise! – mainlyfromclassicalfields

  8. Storing qubits in an atom Field-independenttransitions F = 1 119.645 Gauss 1 GHz 1207 MHz F = 2 Time (seconds!) Langer et al. PRL 95, 060502 (2005)

  9. Entanglementforprotection Rejectionofcommon-modenoise Nowconsiderentangledstate Ifnoiseiscommonmode, entangledstatescanhaveverylongcoherencetimes Haffner et al., Appl. Phys. B 81, 151-153 (2005)

  10. Preparingthestatesofions Optical pumping – stateinitialisation Use a dipoletransitionforspeed Example: calcium Calcium: scatteraround 3 photonstoprepare

  11. Reading out thequantumstate Imaging system Photon scatteredevery 7 ns BUT weonlycollect a smallfractionofthese Need toscatter 1000 photonstodetectatom

  12. Measurement – experimentsequence Detect Initialise Manipulate Howmanyphotons? Statistics: repeattheexperimentmany (1000) times Numberofphotons = 8, 4, 2, 0, 0, 1, 5, 0, 0, 8 ….

  13. Single shotmeasurement “Realizationofquantumerror-correction“, Chiaverini et al., Nature 432, 602, (2004) Target Classicalprocessing “Ifyouget 1, 0, do Y, else do X“ Ancilla Ancilla Measurement: “8 counts, this qubit is 1!“ Accuracyof 0.9999 achieved in 150 microseconds Myerson et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 200502, (2008)

  14. Manipulatingsingle qubits Laser-driven, quadrupole Resonant microwaves, hyperfine Counts Raman transition, hyperfine

  15. Addressing individual qubits Frequencyaddressing Intensityaddressing 240 μm Shinelaser beam atoneion in string Image: Roee Ozeri 2-4 μm Separate ionsby a distancemuch larger than laser beam size

  16. Multiple qubits: interactions

  17. Multiple ions: coupledharmonicoscillators Expandaboutequilibrium – equationofmotion Independent oscillators - sharedmotion

  18. The original thought Ciracand Zoller, PRL (1995) “The collectiveoscillatoris a quantumbus“

  19. The forcedharmonicoscillator Classicalforcedoscillator “returns“ after Radius ofloop

  20. Forcedquantumoscillators Transient excitation, phaseacquired

  21. State-dependentexcitation

  22. Two-qubit gate, state-dependentexcitation Force is out ofphase; exciteStretchmode Force is in-phase; excite COM mode

  23. Examples:quantum computing Choosethedurationand power: Universal two-qubit ion trap quantum processor: Hanneke et al. Nature Physics 6, 13-16 (2010)

  24. Laser-driven multi-qubit gates basis, polarisationstandingwave basis, interferenceeffect Leibfried et al. Nature 422, 412-415 (2003) F F F F

  25. State andentanglementcharacterisation 8, 6, 7, 4, 9, 0, 0, 1, 1, 6, 1, 9, 0, 0… Detect 5, 4, 3,11, 4, 1, 0, 0, 1, 8, 0, 8, 1, 0… Entanglement – correlations… Choose 12 different settingsof Qubits in the same state Reconstructdensitymatrix Qubits in different states F = 0.993 (Innsbruck) Benhelm et al. Nat. Phys 4, 463(2008)

  26. Quantum simulationwithtrapped-ions Creationof “condensed-matter“ Hamiltonians (Friedenauer et al. Nat. Phys 4, 757-761 (2008) Kim et al. Nature 465, 7298 (2010)) Go tolimitof large motionaldetuning (verylittleentanglementbetweenspinandmotion)

  27. Dealingwith large numbersofions Limitation Technical requirement Spectralmodeaddressing Mode densityincreases Manyions Heatingrates proportional to N Simultaneouslaseraddressing Ions takeupspace (separation > 2 micron) Laser beamsare finite-size

  28. Entanglementof multiple ions Monz et al., PRL 106, 130506 (2011) High contrast – 3 ions Reducedcontrast – 14 ions

  29. Isolate smallnumbersofions Wineland et al. J. Res. Nat. Inst. St. Tech, (1998) “coolant“ ion Technological challenge – large numbersofelectrodes, manycontrolregions

  30. Distributingentanglement: probabilistic "Click" "Click" 50/50 beamsplitter Entangled ions separated by 1m( Moehring et al. Nature 449, 68 (2008) )

  31. Transport withions 240 μm Move: 20 us, Separate 340 us, 0.5 quanta/separation Internalquantumstatesofionsunaffectedbytransport Motionalstatesareaffected – canbere-initialised Total transport distance = 1 mm Zone A Separation ZoneB 10 ms J .P. Home et al. Science 325, 1228 (2010)

  32. end view of quadrupole electrodes RF electrodes Control electrodes Trapping ions on a chip For microfabricationpurposes, desirable to deposit trap structures on a surface (Chiaveriniet al., Quant. Inf. & Computation (2005), Seidelin et al. PRL 96, 253003 (2006)) trap axis Field lines: Challenges: shallow trap depth (100 meV) charging of electrodes Opportunities: high gradients

  33. Transporting ions on a (complicated) chip J. Amini et al. New. J. Phys 12, 033031 (2010)

  34. Integrated components 1 Vandevender et al. PRL 105, 023001 (2010)

  35. Integrated components eg. Quantum control using microwaves – removes the need for high-power lasers Gradients – produce state-dependent potentialsthrough Zeeman shifts Single-qubit gate 2-qubit gate C. Ospelkaus et al. Nature 182, 476 (2011)

  36. Trapped-ionsandopticalclocks e.g. Rosenband et al., Science 319, 1808 (2008) Frequencystandards Aluminium ion Laser 167 nm 267 nm Has a verystabletransition Requireverystableiontransition BUT 167 nmisvacuum UV

  37. Atomicclocks – quantumlogicreadout Sharedmotion Beryllium Coolingandreadoution Aluminium “Clock” ion: “Allowed” (scatter lots ofphotons) Most accurateandprecisefrequencystandards – 8e-18 fractionaluncertainty (Chou et al. PRL 104, 070802 (2010))

  38. Trapped-ionsummary Haveachievedquantumcontrol ofupto N ions Havedemonstrated all basiccomponentsrequired tocreate large scaleentangledstates Algorithms & gates includeDense-coding, error-correction, Toffoli, Teleportation, Entanglementpurification Entanglmentswapping Working on: Higher precision New manipulationmethods Scalingtomanyions

More Related