1 / 15

Plans for the first Jet Paper

Plans for the first Jet Paper. PWG04 August 24 th 2009. Christian Klein- Bösing for the PWG04 Task Force. A Short , Early P aper on Charged J et R econstruction in p+p ?. Want a maximum of statistics Statistical precision Systematic studies

curry
Télécharger la présentation

Plans for the first Jet Paper

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Plans for the first Jet Paper PWG04 August 24th 2009 Christian Klein-Bösing for the PWG04 Task Force

  2. A Short, Early Paper on Charged Jet Reconstruction in p+p? • Want a maximum of statistics • Statistical precision • Systematic studies • Depend on understanding of high pT tracking • High pT spectra needed first • But even if the paper will be not “short” or “early” the following should give you an idea of the key points Not in the timescale of a few weeks Christian Klein-Bösing

  3. Title • Inclusive Jet Production and Jet Fragmentation • in p+p collisions at 7 TeV/10 TeV • Measured with Charged particles in the ALICE Experiment Christian Klein-Bösing

  4. Beam Energy/Luminosity PYTHIA8 simulation + fastjet (R = 0.7) 10 TeVp+p 7 TeVp+p Here only MB events, luminosity more relevant when triggering, (But pileup effects depend on luminosity and bunch pattern). 109 ≈ 20 d × 60% × 1 kHz Christian Klein-Bösing

  5. Rough Abstract Christian Klein-Bösing

  6. Figures and Tables • Fig. 1: Response matrix • MC all vs. MC charged • MC charged vs. rec • Fig. 2: • Fragmentation function (for charged jet) • Comparison to MC and MLLA • Fig. 3: • Jet spectrum, corrected up to charged jet energy • Unfolded to total jet energy (for different cuts in z of the leading jet) Christian Klein-Bösing

  7. Fig. 1 • Response Matrix • Emphasize the two levels of corrections to reconstructed jets • Charged track jet → charged particle jet → all particle jet MC (all R = 0.4) MC (ch. R = 0.4) MC (ch. R = 0.4) Rec (R = 0.4) Christian Klein-Bösing

  8. Fig. 2 • Bias of the charged jet reconstruction • Reduced when using dijets (TODO) • Compare to different fragmentation models • PYTHIA (string) • HERWIG (cluster) • Also differ in UE • TODO • At low ξ comparable to calculations (e.g. MLLA) without corrections? • Influence of UE • TODO • pT,jet> 40 GeV most relevant for comparison with Pb+Pb Leading jet fragmentation for R = 0.4 (LHC09a1-3) Christian Klein-Bösing

  9. Fig. 3 • Raw spectrum corrected for detector effects (charged jet spectrum) • Fully corrected total jet spectrum • Different subsamples of jets corrected to full • Different leading particle z (TODO) Christian Klein-Bösing

  10. Tables • Table 1: • Examples for reconstructed momentum shift and smear due to: • Limited Cone radius • Charged to neutral • MC to reconstruction • Table 2: • Systematic uncertainties TODO Christian Klein-Bösing

  11. Rough Layout Christian Klein-Bösing

  12. What Needs to Be Done • Systematic uncertainties • Jet Momentum scale checks • Flavour dependence, biases (cuts on jet shapes) • Corrections • Revisit unfolding procedure: variable bin size, regularization • Underlying event in multiple collisions • High pTQA • cannot rely on jet spectrum if single particle spectra are not understood • Connection to MB data → coordinate QA • Sharpen focus on fragmentation • Comparison to generators (i.e. PYTHIA: Lund Fragmentation, HERWIG cluster fragmentation) and theory • Analysis note Christian Klein-Bösing

  13. Momentum Scale • Induced by JF • Cone radius/R-parameter • Bias • Algorithms • Can be studied with data alone • Correlations • Average energy in certain “trigger-bin” compared to mean momentum • Should be symmetric in η-φ: otherwise acceptance effects • 2D correlation TODO • Also handle on UE contribution • Induced by reconstruction • QA, high pTspectra Charged particles correlated with leading jet axis Christian Klein-Bösing

  14. High pTQA: Cuts Improved cut on 1/pT uncertainty (relative) loose cuts B. Bathen loose cuts + relpT error Christian Klein-Bösing

  15. People from thePWG4 Task Force • Jet Spectrum • Unfolding: CKB, YdaliaDelgado • Jet Finders • FastJet: S. Jangal, M. Estienne, J. Thäder, O. Busch • Deterministic Annealing: D. Perrino • Di-jets: D. Perrino • Fragmentation function: B. Bathen, V. Roman • Jet shape/topology: S. Pochybova. L. Molnar • Underlying event: A. Abrahantas, E. Lopez, S. Valero, A. Agosc • High pT QA: G. Barros (M. Munhoz), M. Verweij (M. van Leeuwen), B. Bathen Christian Klein-Bösing

More Related