1 / 23

Issue: Performance Management Topic 4: Performance Management in Education Sector

Issue: Performance Management Topic 4: Performance Management in Education Sector. A Joint Conference of World Bank and KDI. Performance Management in Education: A Call for Paradigm Reform in South Korea. Ju Ho Lee (KDI School of Public Policy and Management ).

dalton-herman
Télécharger la présentation

Issue: Performance Management Topic 4: Performance Management in Education Sector

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Issue: Performance Management Topic 4: Performance Management in Education Sector A Joint Conference of World Bank and KDI Performance Management in Education:A Call for Paradigm Reform in South Korea Ju Ho Lee (KDI School of Public Policy and Management)

  2. Labor Economics 2003 Fall Performance Management in Education: A Call for Paradigm Reform in South Kores Intro. eBay’s success Growth Q&A First, Overview of the performance in Education The Structure of the paper Second, Overview of the performance management system in Education Third, Propose reform agenda to improve the performance-management system

  3. Section 1. Performance in Education <Table 1> Average Test Scores (Unit: Ranking out of 31) Source: OECD “Knowledge and Skill for Life”, PISA 2000

  4. Section 1. Performance in Education <Table 1-1> Distribution of Test Scores: Reading literacy (Unit:percentage) Source: OECD “Knowledge and Skill for Life”, PISA 2000

  5. Section 1. Performance in Education <Table 2> Student Engagement (Unit: percentage) Source: OECD “Student Engagement at School”, PISA 2000

  6. Section 1. Performance in Education <Table 3> Student participation in educational courses outside school (Unit: percentage) Source: OECD “Knowledge and Skill for Life”, PISA 2000 • Percent of students who have sometimes or regularly attended courses in the language of assessment, courses in other subjects, or extension or additional courses in the last three years • Percent of students who have sometimes or regularly attend courses in the language of assessment, remedial courses in other subjects, training to improve study skills or private tutoring in the last three years

  7. Section 1. Performance in Education <Table 4> Teacher Evaluation by Student (Unit: WARM estimator, Ranking out of 27) Source: OECD “Knowledge and Skill for Life”, PISA 2000

  8. Section 1. Performance in Education <Table 4> Teacher Evaluation by Principle (Unit: WARM estimator, Ranking out of 27) Source: OECD “Knowledge and Skill for Life”, PISA 2000

  9. Section 2. Performance-Management in Education - Performance Monitoring Scholastic achievement Evaluation in Korea • To understand the academic achievement of students • To assess the curriculum and pedagogical methodology But, not directly used to strengthen the accountability of schools The problem is, - not use results of the scholastic achievement evaluation to hold schools accountable - not disclose the results of the scholastic achievement evaluation

  10. Section 2. Performance-Management in Education - Project Evaluations <Table 5> Evaluation on Local Education Authorities by the Ministry of Education & Human Resources Development

  11. Section 2. Performance-Management in Education - Project Evaluations <Table 5> Evaluation on Local Education Authorities by the Ministry of Education & Human Resources Development

  12. Section 2. Performance-Management in Education - Project Evaluations <Table 6> Budget Distributed According to the Result of Evaluation on Local Education Authority by the Ministry of Education & Human Resources Development (Units: Hundred Million Won) Source: Committee of Evaluation on Local Education Authority(for each year) Note: Basis for Distribution in 2001, (1)Basic Allotment (20%) + Allotment by Total Score Obtained (80%), (2) Index of Basic Allotment = Student (80%)

  13. Section 2. Performance-Management in Education - Project Evaluations <Table 7> Evaluation on Schools by the Ministry of Education & Human Resources Development(based on documents)

  14. Section 2. Performance-Management in Education - Project Evaluations <Table 7> Evaluation on Schools by the Ministry of Education & Human Resources Development(based on documents) Source: Ministry of Education and Human Resource Development and Korea Education Development (2003), “Reports on the Results of the Overall School Evaluation,” pp.14~17.

  15. Section 2. Performance-Management in Education - Project Evaluations <Table 8> Evaluation on Schools by the Ministry of Education & Human Resources Development(based on school-visits)

  16. Section 2. Performance-Management in Education - Project Evaluations <Table 8> Evaluation on Schools by the Ministry of Education & Human Resources Development(based on school-visits)

  17. Section 2. Performance-Management in Education - Project Evaluations <Table 9> Evaluation on General High Schools by Seoul Metropolitan Office of Education

  18. Section 2. Performance-Management in Education - Project Evaluations <Table 9> Evaluation on General High Schools by Seoul Metropolitan Office of Education Source: Seoul Metropolitan Office of Education (2004), “Report of School Evaluation for the 2003 Academic Year,” pp. 10~72.

  19. Section 3. A Call for Raradigm Reform Elevate the Education Performance Evaluation First, Assessment of student achievement should be based on students evaluation on both cognitive and non-cognitive skills Second, Utilize results of students achievement evaluation based on diverse methods: (1) the absolute level of achievement of schools (2) the change in achievement of schools (3) the extent of improving student achievement of targeted students

  20. Section 3. A Call for Raradigm Reform Establish a New Accountability System • Accountability Schools : Introduce different types of schools that allow school choices • Accountability Programs : Improve student achievement for the students of low-income and low-ability • Accountability Contests : Promote competition among schools via Accountability Contests

  21. Section 3. A Call for Raradigm Reform Accountability Schools For Accountability Schools Introduce different types of schools that allow school choices - Diversifying the school system through the introduction of new types of schools - Allow school choice, autonomous school management, and financial assistance based on formula funding - Access Accountability Schools by Accountability Tests

  22. Section 3. A Call for Raradigm Reform Accountability Programs For Accountability Programs Improve student achievement for the students of low-income and low-ability • Strengthen remedial education program to enhance the performance of low-income and low-performing students • - Hold schools accountable based on the improvement of achievement of targeted students

  23. Section 3. A Call for Raradigm Reform Accountability Contests For Accountability Contests • Promote competition among schools via Accountability Contest • Performance goals will be set by the Ministry, Local Education Authority… • Schools will voluntarily participate the contest • Participating schools will be allowed with more autonomy • Reward schools, teachers, and students that won the contest

More Related