1 / 22

Measuring the Allocation of Control in a 6 Degree-of-Freedom Docking Experiment

Measuring the Allocation of Control in a 6 Degree-of-Freedom Docking Experiment. Introducing the M -metric. Maurice R. Masliah and Paul Milgram Ergonomics in Teleoperation and Control (ETC) Lab Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering

damien
Télécharger la présentation

Measuring the Allocation of Control in a 6 Degree-of-Freedom Docking Experiment

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Measuring the Allocation of Controlin a 6 Degree-of-Freedom Docking Experiment Introducing the M-metric Maurice R. Masliah and Paul Milgram Ergonomics in Teleoperation and Control (ETC) Lab Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5S 3G8 http://etclab.rose.utoronto.ca {moman, milgram}@etclab.mie.utoronto.ca

  2. Motivation (Images courtesy of Shumin Zhai and Ravin Balakrishnan)

  3. Overview • Measures/definitions of performance metrics • The M-metric • Hypothesis for 6 DOF docking tasks • 6 DOF docking experiment • Results using the M-metric and discussion • Shortcomings / Future Work of the M-metric

  4. Hypothetical Trajectories : 2 DOF

  5. Measures/Definitions of Coordination • time-on-target (“not very suitable” [Poulton ‘74]) • accuracy  speed [Behbehani et al. ‘88] • spatial or temporal invariance [Morrison & Newell ‘98] • cross-correlations [Vereijken et al. ‘92, Zhai et al. ‘96] • integrality [Jacob et al. ‘94] • inefficiency [Zhai & Milgram ‘98]

  6. Integrality vs. Inefficiency • Integrality is a measure of simultaneity (in the time domain) • Inefficiency is a measure of distance traversed (in the space domain) B A

  7. The M-metric • Measures the allocation of control across DOFs • “Control” = any movement which reduces error • “Error” = the difference between the goal position and the current position • M-metric = (control simultaneity) × (control efficiency)

  8. Area under DOF curve = 1 Normalized Error Reduction Area of overlap, intersection between the DOFs. Definition of Control Simultaneity CHANGE IN ERROR

  9. Control Efficiency Efficiency =the weighted average of the ratios of the length of the “optimal” trajectory for each DOF divided by the actual trajectory

  10. M-metric: Primary Features • measures the allocation of control • = simultaneity  efficiency • values between 0 and 1 • computed for any number of DOFs ( 2) • (also subsets of the total available DOFs) • computed across DOFs encompassing different measurement units (cm, degrees)

  11. Hypothesis for 6 DOF docking tasks • Non-equal allocation of control across DOFs • Novices • will allocate their control between translation and rotation DOFs • will switch control back and forth • As expertise develops: • will continue to allocate their control between translation and rotation DOFs with improved control • will develop uniform allocation of control across all 6 DOFs

  12. Experimental Design 8 subjects total (between subjects design)  2 input devices :  216 docking trials per session  5 one hour sessions Spaceball Finger-ball = 8640 total trials

  13. Results: Task Completion Times

  14. within translation within rotation between translation & rotation Results: M-metric Scores 2-way Comparisons

  15. within translation within rotation between translation & rotation Results: M-metric Scores 3-way Comparisons

  16. within rotation between translation & rotation Results: M-metric Scores Over Time

  17. M-metric Summary • new metric for measuring allocation of control • tested in a longitudinal 6 DOF docking task • subjects allocated allocated unequally control across all 6 dofs • subjects controlled rotation & translation separately • separation of control for the isometric device greater than for the isotonic device

  18. Shortcomings / Future Work • Need to define the “correct” path unequivocally • In docking, any trajectory which accomplishes the docking goal is acceptable. • Expand M-metric definition to include tracking, tracing, and target acquisition tasks. • Next experiment : test M-metric on a dynamic 6 DOF tracking task

  19. Conclusion:In a multi-degree of freedom continuous movement task: • the M-metric provides a measure of how control is allocated across available DOFs • it is possible to have two movements with equal performance scores, but with very different time-space trajectories

  20. Acknowledgements • Institute of Robotics and Intelligent Systems (IRIS) • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) • Shumin Zhai, IBM Almaden Research • Ravin Balakrishnan, University of Toronto

  21. Taxonomy of Manual Control Tasks [Masliah ‘99]

More Related