1 / 14

Dean’s Office Support for Faculty Research

Dean’s Office Support for Faculty Research. CCAS 2010 New Orleans, LA Paula M. Lutz, Dean College of Letters and Science Montana State University; Bozeman. Montana State University Bozeman, MT. MSU-Bozeman: Institutional Information. Research expectations—set by departments

Télécharger la présentation

Dean’s Office Support for Faculty Research

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Dean’s Office Support for Faculty Research CCAS 2010 New Orleans, LA Paula M. Lutz, Dean College of Letters and Science Montana State University; Bozeman

  2. Montana State University Bozeman, MT

  3. MSU-Bozeman: Institutional Information • Research expectations—set by departments a. sciences—grant-funded laboratory by tenure, grad students trained and peer-reviewed publications; oral presentations or posters at professional meetings b. letters—dissertation  monograph or peer-reviewed articles; presentation of papers at professional meetings • Office of Sponsored Programs: some centralized accounting and grant-writing support; OSP/VPR also provides start-up $ AND incentives (buyouts, Short Term Professional Development Leaves, annual research and creativity awards) • GRANTS ($109M in expenditures in FY10 campus-wide; $29M CLS) F&A  investment in research across all disciplines (start-up funds, $ for incentives and awards)

  4. Policies and opportunities for specific disciplines • Natural sciences: equipment purchases--grants (NSF MRI), foundations (Murdock Trust), and start-up funds; travel funds from grants and start-up packages; all start-up from VPR at present; equipment maintenance funded from F&A return • Social sciences: current emphasis provides grant-writing mentoring and seed grants (INBRE); travel funds available from Research Enhancement Awards (REA’s) in the College and Scholarship & Creativity grants campus-wide; course buyouts through BEST awards • Arts and humanities: travel funds available through REA and S&C; course buyouts through BEST awards

  5. MSU Opportunities • Research Enhancement Awards (REA) within the College: primarily for Letters; provide travel support for conferences; $75-100K from VPR and College F&A return (internal competition); • Buy-Out for Enhancing Scholarship and Teaching (BEST Awards): funded by VPR; competitive—15-20 per academic year; most often for Arts/Letters • Short-Term Professional Development Leaves (STPD’s): funded by VPR; funds longer research travel • Scholarship and Creativity Grants:funded by VPR; ($250k from central F&A funds via campus competition with external review); grants of $6k to 22k for lengthy, focused research projects/travel for Arts/Letters (such as summer research at an archive or an archeological dig) • Interdisciplinary Research/Creativity Proposals: up to $7.5K for ‘ID’ proposal development and submission • Montana Research and Commercialization Grants: Dept. of Commerce; $1.4M pool; requires 25% match

  6. Policies related to research support • Encouragement of proposal production and success: through New Faculty Forum, INBRE seed grants (special emphasis on social science research from NIH and NSF), internal seed grants for interdisciplinary research • Annual faculty awards honoring research and creativity: Creative Scholarship & Teaching; Meritorious Technology & Science; Undergraduate Research and Creativity Mentoring; Meritorious Research & Creativity • Research leaves: negotiable post-tenure under special circumstances; campus sabbatical policy through Faculty Senate process—10-12 per year; course reductions negotiated with start-up packages or through grant funds • Applied research, pedagogical research, community engagement: special emphasis on interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary research provides seed money at present; Teaching and Learning Center provides seed money for research in pedagogy; as a land grant, MSU has Extension as a CE link AND the Montana Agriculture Experiment Station (MAES) funding (primarily for the sciences)

  7. Obstacles/issues/challenges? • Research faculty/administration communication: a. Frustration over recent, sudden reductions in F&A return to colleges, departments, and PI’s; b. A new Research Board recently created as part of our new president’s faculty governance structure; c. Frustration over VPR, faculty, and deans’ sense that research F&A is used to backfill A&F shortfalls • Support services: social science researchers in departments just entering the chase for external funding have increasing needs for staff support; • Research space: Constant source of acrimony and discontent; negotiated in start-ups; expansions difficult; success in obtaining federal dollars for several buildings (USDA, NIH); self-funded one research building by bonding on future F&A returns;

  8. Decanal Support of Faculty Research, Scholarship, and Creative Activityacross Different Disciplines Christopher McCord College of Liberal Arts & Sciences November 11, 2010

  9. Research Expectations • Standards for Promotion & Tenure and annual merit evaluation are set by department; approved by college. • All departments in CLAS expect faculty to be research-active for Promotion & Tenure. • Annual merit is based on research, teaching & service; weights vary by dept. and can be individualized in some depts. • Level of research activity varies by discipline & teaching load, which in turn varies depending on whether or not department offers PhD. • No department requires external funding for Promotion & Tenure; some are moving towards some requirement.

  10. Research Support • Encouragement of proposal production and success • VPR funds “Research & Artistry” awards; separate categories for those in disciplines w/ access to external funding and those w/out • OSP has research development specialists who work w/ individual faculty to develop long-term research goals & funding strategies • Support for Undergraduate Research: • University funds Undergraduate Special Opportunities for Artistry & Research (student-initiated research funding requests) • College funds Undergraduate Research Apprenticeship Program (faculty-initiated funding requests to engage students in their research) • Research leaves: • Sabbatical leaves every 6 years (recently able to fund about 30 per year in CLAS) • Course buy-outs (15% of salary per course, up to $15,000) • Moving more & more towards differential teaching loads based on research activity.

  11. Research Support • Applied research, pedagogical research, community engagement • College has important role in validating & promoting such work • University Outreach provides contacts; VPR provides support on technology transfer • OSP provides same logistical support as for research funding • Start-Up Funding • Negotiated with individuals in laboratory sciences; college provides lead funding, with some support from VPR and department • For all other individuals, College provides fixed 8K award, to be used during first 2 years at faculty member’s discretion. • Shared Research Facilities • Working with VPR to move towards shared analytical facilities (including physical facilities such as NMR’s and gene sequencing; computing facilities; methods resources such as statisticians or quantitative research methods) • Moving towards centrally-funded facilities with cost recovery (both direct & indirect).

  12. Research Support • Engagement with National Laboratories: We support joint appointments and collaborative research partnerships with Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (FNAL) and Argonne National Laboratory (ANL). • Support for Interdisciplinary Research: • VPR returns 10% of F&A to formal interdisciplinary units • College promotes “shared credit”, formal joint appointments, embedding of interdisciplinary effort into reward & regard system; providing a “level playing field” for interdisciplinary work. • College & Provost’s Office fund specific interdisciplinary projects such as Environmental Studies & Southeast Asian Studies. • Joint Appointments • Joint appointments can be either internal (within college, across colleges, between 2 depts. or dept. and interdisc. Center) or external w/ ANL and FNAL. • College provides infrastructure and “moral support” for facilitating joint appts.: codifies how joint appts. work in annual reviews, merit, P&T, access to funding, etc.

  13. Support for Specific Disciplines • Laboratory Sciences: • Equipment Purchases are funded through cost-sharing on grants (NSF MRI), and start-up funds • Space owned by departments; College provides some cost-sharing on renovations • Graduate assistants – moving towards incentives for externally-funded RA’s. • Single-Scholar Work: • Travel and release-time are the most valuable forms of support. • Both are provided to new faculty through startup packages; • Depts., college & VPR contribute to travel; VPR funds release-time through Research & Artistry awards • Creative Work & Interdisciplinary Work: • Recognition of the validity of both is an important form of support

  14. Issues & Challenges • Research faculty/administration communication: • Post-award support in Grants Fiscal Accounting is focused primarily on compliance; somewhat adversarial relationship between GFA & PI’s. • Lack of understanding of F&A distribution; believe that F&A distribution doesn’t direct resources to ongoing research support. • Research Facilities: University has created research facilities w/out providing funding beyond initial setup. Need support for staffing; maintenance; upgrades. Need methodology for deciding which facilities to provide on-campus; which to out-source. • Culture & Expectations for Funding: Efforts to “prime the pump” by providing university funding to underwrite research infrastructure has not been phased out and has become entrenched.

More Related