1 / 6

Bucharest, October 12-13, 2010 WORKSHOP: European Regional Development Fund and the Cohesion Fund Cristi Mihalache – RO

Contribuţia fondurilor europene la integrarea populaţiei Roma : Reuniuni la nivel înalt – România High Level Event - Contribution of EU funds to the integration of Roma. Bucharest, October 12-13, 2010 WORKSHOP: European Regional Development Fund and the Cohesion Fund

daniel_millan
Télécharger la présentation

Bucharest, October 12-13, 2010 WORKSHOP: European Regional Development Fund and the Cohesion Fund Cristi Mihalache – RO

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Contribuţia fondurilor europene la integrarea populaţiei Roma: Reuniunila nivelînalt – RomâniaHigh Level Event - Contribution of EU funds to the integration of Roma Bucharest, October 12-13, 2010 WORKSHOP: European Regional Development Fund and the Cohesion Fund Cristi Mihalache – ROMA EDUCATION FUND

  2. European Fund for Regional Development – 2007-2013 – relevance for Roma population • The mono-fund approach as new compared to multi-fund approach 2000-2006 and its impact on the complexity of issues facing Roma population. • DG Regio initiated consultations with civil society in 2010 and stressed the relevance of application by member states of changes in art.7 of ERDF Regulation starting this programming period. • Limitation on interventions in Roma neighborhoods

  3. Regional Operational Programme 2007-2013 Romania • Differences in consultations within the preparation of the programming phase in terms of consideration of the socially vulnerable groups compared with SOPHRD. • Limitation of applicability of interventions in neighborhoods with significant Roma population (Urban rehabilitation, social infrastructure.

  4. Issues of implementation of the ROP in Romania • Applicationprocess: issues of eligibilityofpotentialbeneficiaries and activities; • Evaluationprocess: the crucial importance of thehorizontal theme of equalityofchances; theuseofexperiencedevaluators on issues of Roma inclusion; issues on thetransparency of theevaluationprocess; thelackof NGO representatives, particularly of social NGOssuch as on Roma issuesfromthe Monitoring Committee of the ROP;

  5. Issues of implementation of the ROP in Romania (continue) • Housing as a crucial entry point braking the cycle of poverty exclusion and discrimination. • Selection of neighborhoods by local institutions considering deterioration and social needs not only economic and political interests. • Limitation of funding for social infrastructure.

  6. Recommendations for the preparation of 2014-2020 programming phase: • broad consultation to include Roma NGOs in the development of strategic priorities of the NDP and SNRF; • the revisiting of the implementation system on issues regarding priorities, eligibility of activities and potential beneficiaries, encouraging of partnerships (public, privat, NGOs); • the development of a transparent system based on broader consultation with a view to the Monitoring Committee and the system of launching the calls for proposals, evaluation and implementation; • the development of clear evaluation criteria in which the horizontal themes to be effectively considered in all stages (initial evaluation, monitoring during implementation and post-monitoring.

More Related