1 / 35

Ryan White CARE Act – Reauthorization –

Ryan White CARE Act – Reauthorization –. ‘What you can do !’ Sue Rowland -- VORA September 20, 2005. The Problem. What’s the future for HIV/AIDS Treatment funding? Or “The canary is awfully sick …”. Or ….

Télécharger la présentation

Ryan White CARE Act – Reauthorization –

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Ryan White CARE Act – Reauthorization – ‘What you can do!’ Sue Rowland -- VORA September 20, 2005

  2. The Problem What’s the future for HIV/AIDS Treatment funding? Or “The canary is awfully sick …”

  3. Or … • The Ryan White C.A.R.E. Act provides significant levels of public funding for HIV/AIDS treatment services • It is authorized by Congress for 5 years at a time • The current authority for Ryan White funds expires on Sept 30, 2005

  4. History Of theRyan White C.A.R.E. Act

  5. First passed as “the Ryan White CARE Act of 1990” [Public law 101-381] • Amended as the Ryan White CARE Act of 1996 • Again amended as the Ryan White CARE Act of 2000

  6. The primary purpose of the Act is established by Congress -- in the Law. The details (the rules) are established by the federal agency assigned … Administered by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA)

  7. The Act is complex … • Title I -- Eligible Metro Areas (EMA’s) • Title II -- the States • ADAP • Title III -- Community-based care • Title IV -- Family-centered care

  8. … there’s more • Part F -- AETC’s • Part F -- Dental Reimbursement Program • SPNS -- Special Projects of National Significance • Community-Based Dental Partnership Program

  9. Total RWCA Funds

  10. Title I Funds

  11. Title II Funds

  12. Title III Funds

  13. Title IV Funds

  14. AETC & Dental Funds

  15. Virginia’s awards • Title I • Washington DC EMA - $29,431,967 ** • Norfolk EMA - $4,726,063 • Richmond EMA - $241,396 • Title II • State - $5,543,229 • ADAP - $15,188,795 • Minority AIDS Initiative - $112,908 • Emerging Communities - $241,396

  16. Virginia Awards • Title III • University of Virginia - $430,537 (05) • Carilion Medical Center - $107,634 (05) • Centra Health, Inc. - $55,170 (04) • Title IV • VCU/MCV - $309,777 (04) • AETC • Based in Richmond • Dental • None

  17. RWCA: Problems … • Structure of the titles results in “double counting” PLWH/A • “Hold harmless” - 90% provided to San Francisco • Southern states receiving less funding Disproportionate distribution of funds

  18. President Bush’s Principles

  19. The President’s Principles • Eliminate “hold harmless” • Eliminate double-counting • Develop “severity of need for core services index” (SNCSI) • National ADAP core meds

  20. President’s Principles (con’t) • 75% of Titles I - IV directed to essential cores services • Change role/make-up of Title I Councils • Use HIV data in distribution formula • New routine voluntary HIV testing

  21. Sen. Tom Coburn leading the Reauthorization review • Held Hearing in June 2005 • GAO Report on “RWCA: Factors that Impact HIV and AIDS Funding and Client Coverage” • Testimony provided to respond to GAO Report implications; supports President

  22. Current Status of Reauthorization • No bill yet introduced to Amend • One bill continues the Title IV portion

  23. The Problem • Every day, 4 new cases of HIV are found in Virginia every day • One third of Va. PLWH/A are women • Two thirds are African American • Treating HIV/AIDS costs about $20,000 per person per year

  24. The Problem • Funding has not kept pace with the growing number of persons living with HIV/AIDS in Virginia • Waiting lists have developed in Virginia • Funding is not even distributed where PLWH/A live

  25. The Problem • During AIDS Watch, we learned that Virginia’s delegation not well aware of needs • In Richmond, Virginia’s State Legislators are unaware of what’s happening with federal funding for HIV/AIDS prevention & treatment

  26. “I Can’t Lobby …. …. Can I?”

  27. You, the Agency … • Your leadership decides • “Lobbying” IS allowable -- and limited.

  28. You, the Individual … • Does the source of your livelihood explicitly prohibit you from lobbying? • Very few do … • How about “implicit” prohibitions? • Know your Rights as an American Citizen.

  29. What are the Rules?

  30. “Yes, You can …” • Two Senators • One Congressperson • One State Senator • One State Delegate

  31. “What do I say?”

  32. Sources of Help • www.VORAonline.org • www.NASTAD.org • www.NMAC.org • www.NAPWA.org • www.C2EA.org And many more ….

  33. Efforts in VirginiaJoint Commission on Health Care Study of Federal Funding for HIV/AIDS prevention and treatment

More Related