1 / 8

LLR-based Distributed Detection for Wireless Sensor Networks

LLR-based Distributed Detection for Wireless Sensor Networks. 後卓越進度報告 蔡育仁老師實驗室 2008/01/07. High LLR. Low LLR. Binary Hypothesis Testing. LLR: Log Likelihood Ratio The received signal Observation noise: assumed to be. Distributed Detection Depends on Likelihood Ratio.

darius-pope
Télécharger la présentation

LLR-based Distributed Detection for Wireless Sensor Networks

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. LLR-based Distributed Detection for Wireless Sensor Networks 後卓越進度報告 蔡育仁老師實驗室 2008/01/07

  2. High LLR Low LLR Binary Hypothesis Testing • LLR: Log Likelihood Ratio • The received signal • Observation noise: assumed to be

  3. Distributed Detection Depends on Likelihood Ratio • LLR can be treated as the reliability of a sample value • Power allocation in WSNs • Power allocation in each sensor based on the instantaneous observed signal • Large absolute value of LLR  High reliability Allocate more power; vice versa • Sequential detection in WSNs • Can reduce the number of required transmission with the similar detection performance • Ordering the message transmission based on the LLR can further reduce the number of transmission • Save more communication power

  4. …… Fusion Center Power Allocation Depends on Log Likelihood Ratio in WSNs

  5. H1 lnA LLR(N) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 N lnB H0 Sequential Detection Depends on Log Likelihood Ratio in WSNs • The thresholds ln(A) and ln(B) depend on the target false alarm probability and miss detection probability

  6. Simulation – LLR-based Power Allocation 100 90 80 70 60 Required power in percentage g Scheme 1, =4 50 o g Scheme 1, =6 o g Scheme 1, =8 40 o g Scheme 1, =10 o 30 g Scheme 2, =4 o g Scheme 2, =6 o 20 g Scheme 2, =8 o g Scheme 2, =10 10 o 0 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 10 10 10 10 10 Detection error probability

  7. 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 -4 -3 -2 -1 10 10 10 10 Simulation – LLR-based Sequential Detection FSS Conventional Real Value T-SPRT Real Value T-SPRT Ordered Real Value T-SPRT Ordered Real Value T-SPRT Required number of transmission Detection error probability

  8. Publications • Journal Paper • Yuh-Ren Tsai, “Sensing Coverage for Randomly Distributed Wireless Sensor Networks in Shadowed Environments,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 57, no. 1, Jan. 2008. (SCI, EI) • Conference Paper • Yuh-Ren Tsai, Kai-Jie Yang and Sz-Yi Yeh, “Non-uniform Node Deployment for Lifetime Extension in Large-scale Randomly Distributed Wireless Sensor Networks,” in Proc. of IEEE International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications (AINA2008), Okinawa, Japan, March 2008. • Yuh-Ren Tsai, and Jyun-Wei Syu, “Down-link CIR Spatial Correlation and CIR Prediction for CDMA Cellular Systems,” in Proc. of IEEE 2008 Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC-2008 Spring), Singapore, May 2008.

More Related