1 / 11

Between-school Variance in Achievement

Between-school Variance in Achievement. Variance in achievement can be partitioned into between- and within-school variance. Between-school variance is expressed as a percentage of the total variance in achievement.

darrylkline
Télécharger la présentation

Between-school Variance in Achievement

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Between-school Variance in Achievement • Variance in achievement can be partitioned into between- and within-school variance. • Between-school variance is expressed as a percentage of the total variance in achievement. • Large between-school variance (relative to within-school variance) can be interpreted as an indicator of a more heterogeneous school system.

  2. Between-school Variance in Science (OECD countries)

  3. Between-school Variance in Mathematics (OECD Countries)

  4. Between-school Variance in Reading Literacy (OECD Countries)

  5. School-level score point difference associated with one-unit increase in school mean ESCS

  6. Between-school variance in science explained by ESCS (selected countries)

  7. Explaining Performance in Science – Student-level variables • Gender • Socio-economic status (JC fee-waiver) • Number of books in the home • Home educational resources (more resources better) • Absence from school (frequent absenteeism associated with lower scores) • Grade level (Students in lower grade levels do less well) • Study of science (those who don’t study science do less well)

  8. Conclusion • Relative to other countries, differences in performance between schools in Ireland are moderate. • Nevertheless, there is an association between school-level socioeconomic status and school-level achievement, which is also in the moderate range. • Further, school-level socio-economic status seems to account for the ‘effects’ of other school variables such as school type, school size, and school gender composition.

  9. Conclusion • Variables such as home educational resources, parent-student interaction, attendance at school, engagement in science, extent of bullying, involvement in paid work etc. would seem to be candidates for change. • Care needs to be exercised in interpreting associations between attitudinal variables and achievement, particularly between self-efficacy and science performance.

  10. Conclusion • Associations between curriculum and PISA are worth examining in more detail, particularly in the case of mathematics. • In the case of science, more work is needed in examining the how reading ability interacts with scientific knowledge in explaining performance.

  11. Conclusion • Another issue worth examining in more detail is the performance of students not taking Junior Certificate science vs. those taking Ordinary level. • Finally, differences in knowledge of science among male and female students are worth exploring in greater detail.

More Related