1 / 25

Vienna 2- 4 July 2007

Absorption Technology / Case Studies in Egypt. Absorption Technology Case Studies in Egypt. Dr. Alaa Olama Vice Chairman, GasCool. Expert Group meeting On “Designing Mechanisms to Facilitate the Removal of Barriers to CFC-Chiller Replacements”. Vienna 2- 4 July 2007.

deidra
Télécharger la présentation

Vienna 2- 4 July 2007

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Absorption Technology / Case Studies in Egypt Absorption Technology Case Studies in Egypt Dr. Alaa Olama Vice Chairman, GasCool Expert Group meeting On “Designing Mechanisms to Facilitate the Removal of Barriers to CFC-Chiller Replacements” Vienna 2- 4 July 2007

  2. Absorption Technology / Case Studies in Egypt Contents: 1.0- Introduction 2.0- Absorption Technology 3.0- Advantages of Absorption Vs Mechanical Vapour Compression 4.0- District Cooling/Heating 5.0- Advantages of District Cooling/Heating 6.0- District Cooling/Heating at Smart Village (Cairo-Egypt) 7.0- District Cooling/Heating & Co-generation at the AUC 8.0- District Cooling/Heating at Petrosport 9.0- District Cooling/Heating at Echem 10.0- Absorption Vapour Compression benefits compared to M.V.C. 8-1 Environmental Impact 8-2 Economical Impact 8-3 Social Impact 11.0- Conclusions and Recommendations

  3. 1- Introduction: Absorption Technology / Case Studies in Egypt • The Egyptian Co. For Refrigeration by Natural Gas - GasCool has was established on September 29, 2004 1.1- GasCool Shareholders: • Egyptian Natural Gas Holding Co. (EGAS) 20% • The Egyptian Natural Gas Co. (GASCO) 25% • PETROJET 20% • EGYPT GAS 20% • Dr. Alaa Olama (Vice Chairman) 10% • TOWN GAS 5% 1.2- GasCool Capital: • Paid Capital is LE 40 million ( $ 7.1 million). • Authorized Capital is LE 110 million ( $ 19.3 million).

  4. Absorption Technology / Case Studies in Egypt POWER (kW) MECHANCIAL VAPOUR COMRESSION High Side Condenser E.D. Compressor Evaporator Low Side VAPOURABSORPTIONMACHINE Generator High Side HEAT (Q): Natural Gas Diesel Steam Hot Water Condenser E.D. Evaporator Low Side Absorber 2.0 Absorption Technology: 2.1-Comparison between Mechanical Vapour Compression Cycle and Absorption Vapour Cycle:

  5. Absorption Technology / Case Studies in Egypt 2.0. Absorption Technology (Cont.) 2.2. Absorption Theory: 1. The heating causes the solution to release the absorbed refrigerant in the form of vapour. This vapour is cooled in a separate chamber to become liquid refrigerant.

  6. 2. Boiling point of the water is a function of pressure. At atmospheric pressure water boils at 100 deg. C. When maintained at high vacuum, water will boil and subcool itself. The boiling point of the water at 6 mmHg (abs) is 3.7 deg. C.

  7. 3. Lithium Bromide (LiBr) has the property to absorb water due to its chemical affinity. At higher concentration and lower temperature LiBr absorbs water vapour (refrigerant vapour) very effectively.

  8. 4. As Lithium Bromide becomes dilute it loses its capacity to absorb water vapour. It thus needs to be re-concentrated using a heat source. Heat source may be Steam or Flue gases or even Hot water.

  9. Absorption Technology / Case Studies in Egypt 2.0. Absorption Technology (Cont.) 2.3. A Direct Fired Absorption Chiller:

  10. Absorption Technology / Case Studies in Egypt • 3.0- Advantages/Disadvantages of Absorption Vs • Mechanical Vapour Compression: • 3.1. Disadvantages: • Bulkier than comparable capacity Mechanical Vapour Compression system. • Sluggish response to rapid variable loads when compared to Mechanical Vapour Compression system. • Needs chimneys for flue gases that may be objectionable ecstatically. • Fine leveling and a larger cooling system are a hindrance when water cooled. • Crystallization is a concern that needs to be addressed with care. • Must be water cooled at large capacities which may be prohibitive where water scares.

  11. Absorption Technology / Case Studies in Egypt • 3.0- Advantages/Disadvantages of Absorption Vs • Mechanical Vapour Compression (Cont.): • 3.2. Advantages: • Saves about 70-80% of the required electrical power needed • for equivalent capacity mechanical compression systems. • Saves from 30% to 40% of operating expenses compared to • mechanical compression systems in Egypt. • Mechanical wear is low. • Relatively low noise operation. • Low maintenance cost. • The Refrigerant (water) is environment friendly compared to • refrigerant of the equivalent mechanical compression • systems (CFC or HCFC). • Longer life expectancy , 20-22 years without major • overhauls, compared to 15-18 years for equivalent mechanical • compression systems after a minimum of one major overhaul.

  12. Absorption Technology / Case Studies in Egypt 4.0. District Cooling/Heating

  13. Absorption Technology / Case Studies in Egypt 4.0. District Cooling/Heating (Cont.) • The centralized production and distribution of • cooling/Heating energy. • A Piping network is used for distribution. • A central plant or more meets the cooling/heating energy • demand of dozens of buildings. • The Centralized production of cooling energy is more • environmentally friendly. • District Cooling/Heating is more cost-effective than • distributed individual building cooling. • Centralization improves operational reliability. • Individuals can be billed according to their usage through • energymeters.

  14. Absorption Technology / Case Studies in Egypt 5.0. Advantages/Disadvantages of District Cooling/Heating 5.1 Disadvantage -Can only be used effectively for large cooling/heating loads. -Needs large initial budgets. -The piping network cost constitute a large investment. -Care should be given when calculating the piping network losses as those may be sizable.

  15. Absorption Technology / Case Studies in Egypt 5.0. Advantages/Disadvantages of District Cooling/Heating (Cont.) 5.2 Advantages -Total chillers installed capacity is lower than the algebraic sum of individual buildings capacities which allow for less chillers installed in the district (15 to 20%). • Highly efficient at large cooling/heating loads, which reduces emissions harmful to the atmosphere. • Highly dependable specially at peak loads. • Allows for stand –by capacity at economic cost. • Decreases cost of O&M in individual buildings when compared to central plant O&M cost. • Reduces initial cost for individual buildings.

  16. Absorption Technology / Case Studies in Egypt 6.0. District Cooling/Heating at Smart Village (Cairo-Egypt): Contract duration is 50 years; GasCool was awarded The First District cooling/heating Project in Egypt. The contract was signed on 16 May 2004. The LE 290 million (US $ 51 million) , BOO (Build, Own and Operate) project will be built in phases according to this IT companies conglomerates village needs.

  17. Absorption Technology / Case Studies in Egypt 6.0. District Cooling/Heating at Smart Village (Cairo-Egypt) (Cont.): The first phase of the project is now operational and consists mainly of: The plant: The plant consists of eight modules of 1200 Ton Refrigeration (nominal capacity), N. gas fired absorption chiller units. The units provide both chilled water and hot water to the piping network. Piping network: Piping network is a four pipes system connecting the plant to the buildings, with a total length about 42 KM with diameters ranging from 42" to 6".

  18. Absorption Technology / Case Studies in Egypt 6.0. District Cooling/Heating at Smart Village (Cairo-Egypt) (Cont.): Electrical sources: The project is supplied with the required electrical energy through 11KV/38OV transformers sub-station. Control system: The plant is connected to a Building Management System for performance monitoring. The first stage of the project was inaugurated in April 2006, with a total refrigeration capacity of 8000 Tons.

  19. Absorption Technology / Case Studies in Egypt 7.0. District Cooling/Heating & Co generation at the American University in Cairo: 7.1- Definitions of the BOO project of the AUC • Definitive agreement signed Feb. 9th ,2006. • AUC pays for consumption through tariffs for: • Cooling / Heating per TR/hr. • Electricity per KWhr. • Domestic hot water per KW Thermal. • Installed capacities: • 5 000 TR Cooling. • 6 900 KW Heating. • 7 000 000 TR.hr yearly cooling energy. • 1 600 X 3 KW N. Gas Electric Generating sets.

  20. Absorption Technology / Case Studies in Egypt 7.0. District Cooling/Heating & Co generation at the American University in Cairo (Cont.): 7.2- Description of the plant. 7.2.1 Cooling • 4 X 1 200 TR,nominal Absorption N. Gas fired chillers • 1 X 700 TR, nominal Absorption N. Gas fired chiller • 5 Induced draft cooling towers. • 6 CH.W. Primary pumps, C.S. • 6 C.W. Pumps, C.S. • 5 CH.W Secondary pumps, V.S. • Controls, electric works& ancillaries. 7.2.2 Heating • 2 X 3 500 Kw Hot water boiler • 3 Hot water pumps. • Controls,electric works& ancillaries.

  21. Absorption Technology / Case Studies in Egypt 7.0. District Cooling/Heating & Co generation at the American University in Cairo (Cont.): • 7.2.3 Electricity and Cogeneration 3 X 1 600 Kw. Gas fired Gen. sets. 3 X 2 MVA Cast resin, dry type transformer. 2 X 2.5 MVA Cast resin, dry type transformer. 3 X 920 Kw Heat recovery boilers. 1 X 2 500 Kw Stand-by hot water boiler. • Hot water circulating pumps. Controls, electric works & ancillaries.

  22. Absorption Technology / Case Studies in Egypt Primary-secondary-tertiary pumping. 7.0. District Cooling/Heating & Co generation at the American University in Cairo (Cont.): 7.3- Description of the pumping system.

  23. Absorption Technology / Case Studies in Egypt • 8-0: Absorption Vapour Compression benefits compared to M.V.C.: • 8.1.Enviromental Impact: • Mechanical chiller uses specific amount of CFC which will • be released to the atmosphere on average twice in the life • of the chiller (0.5 kg CFC for every TR). • Absorption chiller uses environmentally friendly refrigerant (water) and environment friendly absorbent (LiBr). • Uses 20 % of the electrical power to drive an Absorption chiller when compared to a CFC based chiller which means reducing global warming. • Equipment overhead transition lines, step up, down transformer, electric distribution grid and electrical switching gear are reduced by 80% which means better economical performance.

  24. Absorption Technology / Case Studies in Egypt 8-0: Absorption Vapour Compression benefits compared to M.V.C. (Cont.): 8.1.Enviromental Impact (Cont.): • Indirect fired absorption chillers uses recovered heat from Gas turbine exhaust resulting the following : • 1- Improve the thermal efficiency of the system. • 2- Reduce exhaust temperature to the atmosphere. • 8.2.Economical Impact • Higher initial cost that is recovered with lower operating • cost. • Lower infrastructure cost for electrical power generation & • distribution.

  25. Absorption Technology / Case Studies in Egypt • 8-0: Absorption Vapour Compression benefits compared to M.V.C. • (Cont.): • 8.3.Social Impact: • Redirect valuable electrical energy to improve quality of • life standards. • Shave off peak electrical demands in summer helping reduce • frequent power outage in a rural area. • - Redirect saved electrical power to socially vital functions.

More Related