1 / 19

The Social Inclusion Agenda in the Western Balkans and Turkey: key challenges

The Social Inclusion Agenda in the Western Balkans and Turkey: key challenges. Dr. Paul Stubbs Senior Research Fellow The Institute of Economics, Zagreb pstubbs@eizg.hr Consultation Workshop, Torino 12.12.11. A ‘Coat of Paint’ Theory of Social Exclusion.

denim
Télécharger la présentation

The Social Inclusion Agenda in the Western Balkans and Turkey: key challenges

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Social Inclusion Agenda in the Western Balkans and Turkey: key challenges Dr. Paul Stubbs Senior Research Fellow The Institute of Economics, Zagreb pstubbs@eizg.hr Consultation Workshop, Torino 12.12.11

  2. A ‘Coat of Paint’ Theory of Social Exclusion Following Paul Gilroy (1987) on racism: • “A coat of paint theory” of social exclusion sees it as an aberrant or surface feature of society, and therefore easily removed. • Seeing social exclusion as an integral part of the way contemporary societies are structured, organised and legitimated, offers a very different perspective. • Exploring the institutionalised nature of social exclusion requires understanding how it is embedded in social relations. • Bringing political agency back in addresses the relationship between social exclusion and clientelistic social relations. • The challenge is, therefore, to deal with the complex and diverse ways that diverse forms of social exclusion actually work.

  3. A ‘Moral Underclass Discourse’ Ruth Levitas (1990) expressed concern about the rise of a Moral Underclass Discourse (MUD) at the expense of both a Social Integrationist Discourse (SID) and, in particular, a Redistributive Discourse (RED) • Social exclusion is caused by the moral attitudes and cultural practices of those who are excluded • Responses to social exclusion may promote dependency and reinforce a “cycle of poverty and deprivation” • Programmes for those capable to work should be conditioned in some way to ensure attitudinal and behavioural change

  4. Social Inclusion Agendas • Residual <-> Comprehesive • Fragmented <-> Co-ordinated • Punitive <-> Empowering • Ad Hoc <-> Evidence-based • Clientelistic <-> Needs-based • Discriminatory <-> Anti-discriminatory • Marginal <-> Central (Growth, Employment, Inclusion, ...)

  5. Europe 2020 The best possibe strategy at the worst possible moment? Positive: key quantifiable targets; flagship initiatives; net social progress; inclusive growth Negative: OMC as ‘business as usual’; return to 1980s anti-poverty agenda; IMF-EU meta-critical partnerships; first wave of NRPs worse than Lisbon II

  6. The Myth of High Social Spending Source: O’Mahony RCC 2011, For EU data EUROSTAT and for WB data IMF and EFPs/PEPs

  7. A Varied Fiscal Envelope Source: O’Mahony RCC 2011

  8. Drivers of Social Exclusion • Multiple shocks: War/conflicts; Structural transition; Deindustrialisation; Erosion of social capital/solidarities; ‘Captured’ social policies; Economic and Financial Crisis • Distortions caused by ‘locked in’ expenditures (tertiary health care; residential care) and new (informal) marketization • Legacy of category-based (not needs-based) social protection • Stigma, discrimination and over-professionalised approaches • Political will – Fiscal space – Technical capacities

  9. Groups ‘At Risk’ of Exclusion • Multi-dimensionality and inter-sectionality of exclusion (n.b. research and data gaps) • ‘At risk’: (Long-term) Unemployed; Older people; Large families; Women; Children; Youth; Low education levels; RDPs; Minorities (esp. Roma but also national minorities and ‘small minorities’); People with Disabilities; People with long-term health issues; Migrants/returnees/left behind • Danger of Generalisations – only (some) men aged 30-45 not excluded? • Spatial dimension: Arc of exclusion; Rural – Urban; Zones of exclusion • ‘New’ survival strategies eroding long-term capabilities?

  10. Emigration and Rural-Urban Migration • Inflexible (formal) labour markets • Mis-match of skills and supply-demand at local-national-regional levels • Loss of highly skilled workforce • Migration as deskilling and discrimination • Those ‘left behind’ in rural and disadvantaged areas • Forced return and vicious not virtual circles

  11. Local Capacities for Social Inclusion • National strategies rarely impact at local levels • Social dimension marginalised in regional and local development strategies • New Regional Social Planning highly technicised but lacks evidence-base • Significant gaps in funding, staffing, capacity • Employment and social assistance emphasised over personal social services

  12. Clientelism and Social Inclusion Policies • Benefits to groups in exchange for political support – governance, citizenship and (re)distribution • Southern Europe – South East Europe – Post-Communist (nb also Corporatist Central Europe) • Institutional particularism <-> Corruption • Employment opportunities • Ethnicised citizenship claims including Diaspora and cross-border claims-making • War veterans as privileged group: passive benefits; positive discrimination; vocal interest groups • Pensioners and minority political parties – categorical or particularistic interests

  13. Promoting Social Inclusion: the state/public sector • The role of the state: public goods – bloated bureaucracy – clientelistic rent seeker? • Post-Yu countries – Centres for Social Work and Employment Bureaux • Governance – poor horizontal and vertical co-ordination • Regulation - over legalistic but with many gaps • Human resources - limited skills to meet ‘new’ social risks • Funding - low and inconsistent; little support for non-state actors/providers • Strategy – too many strategies; too little participation; no real M&E; too influenced by international organisations (nb JIM/JAP process)

  14. Promoting Social Inclusion: the market • Few incentives for private, for-profit providers (health, education, social services, ...) • Some development of Corporate Social Responsibility: move from from philanthropy to sustainable partnerships • Growth of market ideas within the public sector (new public management) • Informal marketization / commodification of public goods /privatization of public space

  15. Promoting Social Inclusion: NGOs • Inverse care law – NGOs where they are needed least • Time-limited, donor-driven funding • Service provision at the expense of advocacy and empowerment? • Projectisation and endless pilot projects • ‘The new project class’ and ‘the rise of the meta-NGO’ • Innovations are very rarely scaled up or rolled out

  16. Promoting Social Inclusion: social entrepreneurship • Lack of definition, understanding and legal framework • Donor-driven model with policy transfer (CEE -> SEE) • Implicit or explicit neo-liberal agenda • SE from below – green, gender, informal networks, etc • New social energy – disability advocacy coalitions

  17. VET for Social Inclusion • Empowering (guidance) or conditional (insertion)? • Linkages to labour force and skills planning • Evidence of impacts on long-term employability? • Cherry picking and creation of new middle class? • Short-term, project-based and reliant on intermediaries • Absence of research on social structure, social mobility, transition from school to work • Building on capacities and coping mechanisms

  18. Towards A Renewed Social Inclusion Agenda I • Inclusive labour markets (disability; age; gender) and improved returns to education (life-long learning; skills; transitioning e.g school to work) • Holistic and integrated child and family policies (early childhood interventions; universal child benefits; family support services) • Deinstitutionalisation and minimum basket of community-based services • Social pensions within ‘active ageing’ policies • Anti-discrimination laws and practices • Area-based approaches/Action zones

  19. Towards A Renewed Social Inclusion Agenda II • Support for ‘evidence-based’ policy making – Strategic Goals; Benchmarks; Indicators; M&E; Impact Assessment (including all stakeholders) • Enhanced ‘social’ dimension of IPA programming • Regional cooperation (modelling OMC-JIM; Peer review/peer learning; common concerns; RCC as bridge to EU/global frameworks?) • Case for repoliticisation and social investment

More Related