1 / 16

Functional and Cognitive Status and Pressure Ulcer Templates Consolidation Updates

Functional and Cognitive Status and Pressure Ulcer Templates Consolidation Updates. April 2012. Feedback from S&I. Provide guidance in C-CDA Implementation Guide on when to use Problems vs. Results for Functional and Cognitive status.

devaki
Télécharger la présentation

Functional and Cognitive Status and Pressure Ulcer Templates Consolidation Updates

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Functional and Cognitive Status and Pressure Ulcer Templates Consolidation Updates April 2012

  2. Feedback from S&I • Provide guidance in C-CDA Implementation Guide on when to use Problems vs. Results for Functional and Cognitive status. • Expand ballot to include examples from other instruments such as MDS and OASIS-C. • Caregiver Template – expand to include both licensed and non-licensed caregiver supports • Assessment Scale – Create a place to describe the of meaning of the scale or how the scale was calculated • Pressure Ulcers – add “depth” to dimensions and include “tissue type” description for the most severe ulcers.

  3. Functional Status Section Updates

  4. Pressure Ulcer Updates

  5. Add Results vs. Problem tables to C-CDA IG

  6. Functional/Cognitive Status Result Observation • Questions: recommend “should” be LOINC • Answers: recommend “should” be SNOMED-CT • *does not preclude using other standard vocabularies

  7. Functional Status Result Observation (Examples) • >Functional Status Section • >>Functional Status Result Observation (MDSv3)* • Question (LOINC): 54744-8 Dressing upper body in last 7D(MDSv3) • Answer (SNOMED CT): 371153006 Independently able • > Functional Status Result Observation (OASIS-C) • Question(LOINC): 57246-1 Current ability: transferring • Answer (SNOMED CT): 165240008 independent: chair/bed transfer • >Functional Status Result Observation (CARE) • Question (SNOMED CT): 289041001 Ability to use cutlery to feed self • Answer (SNOMED CT): 289046006 Able to use cutlery to feed self • *example in C-CDA IG

  8. Cognitive Status Result Observation (Example) • >Functional Status Section • >Cognitive Status Result Observation (CARE)* • Question (LOINC): 5249-2 Observational Assessment of Cognitive Status at 2D Assessment • Answer (SNOMED CT): 61372001 Aggressive behavior • >Cognitive Status Result Observation (MDSv3) • Question (LOINC): 52735-8 Able to recall sock • Answer (LOINC): LA10126-3 Yes, after cueing • >Cognitive Status Result Observation (OASIS-C) • Question (LOINC): 58120-7 Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-2) • Answer: (SNOMED CT): 272022009 feeling depressed • *example in C-CDA IG

  9. Functional/Cognitive Status Problem Observation • Problem Types: • SHALL Functional Status Problem Type = Finding of functional performance and activity • SHALLCognitive Status Problem Type = Cognitive Function Finding

  10. Functional Status Problem Observation (Example) • >Functional Status Section • >Functional Status Problem Observation (CARE) • Problem Type: SHALL Finding of functional performance and activity • Problem (Value Set: Problems): 267036007 shortness of breath • >Functional Status Problem Observation (MDSv3) • Problem Type: SHALL Finding of functional performance and activity • Problem (Value Set: Problems): 286375007 no speech Effective time: 04212003 • >Functional Status Problem Observation (OASIS-C)* • Problem Type: SHALL Finding of functional performance and activity • Problem (Value Set: Problems): 162891007 dyspnea • Effective time: 083002011 • *example in C-CDA IG

  11. Cognitive Status Problem Observation (Example) • >Functional Status Section • >Cognitive Status Problem Observation (CARE) • Problem Type: SHALL Cognitive Function Finding • Problem (Value Set: Problems): 386807006 Impaired Memory • > Cognitive Status Problem Observation (MDSv3)* • Problem Type: SHALL Cognitive Function Finding • Problem (Value Set: Problems): 371632003 ComatoseEffective time: 04212003 • >Cognitive Status Problem Observation (OASIS-C) • Problem Type: SHALL Cognitive Function Finding • Problem (Value Set: Problems): 130988005 Chronic confusion • Effective time: 083002011 • *example in C-CDA IG

  12. Caregiver Support and Ability ObservationExample • Functional Status Section • >Functional Status Result Organizer: Core Self Care ( ICF or SNOMED CT) • Assertion example: • >Functional Status Result Observation • Question: Can the patient bring food to their mouth? (LOINC) • Answer: Dependent. (SNOMED CT) • >entry re: Caregiver Support and Ability • Participant Role: Home Health Nurse • Answer (SNOMED CT): Caregiver able • Non-assertion: • > Functional Status Result Observation • Question: Can the patient bring food to their mouth? (LOINC) • Answer: Dependent. (SNOMED CT) • >entry re: Caregiver Support and Ability • Question: ADL or IADL assistance from any caregiver *(LOINC) • Participant Role: Caregiver, Mother • Answer (SNOMED CT): Caregiver able • * In OASIS-C, CARE, MDSv3 instruments

  13. Assessment Scale updates • Functional Status Section • >Assessment Scale Observation • > Name of Scale (SNOMED CT): BIMS • >(May) Derivation Expression: Would be used to enter a calculation that was used to achieve the score in the scale or may be used to provide details on questions that may be weighted. • >(May)Text: The BIMS score is an aggregate sum of the results in the assessment. The total score range for BIMS is from 00 to 15 where 13 to 15 = cognitively intact, 08 to 12 = moderately impaired, 00 to 07 severely impaired. • >Value: 7 • >(May) Interpretation Code • >(May) Author • >Details of Scale • Question: Repetition of 3 words • Answer: 3 • >Details of Scale • Question: What year is it? • Answer: missed by 2-5 years

  14. Pressure Ulcer Observation updates • Plan of Care or Assessment Section • >Pressure Ulcer Observation • >Pressure Ulcer (details of a given pressure ulcer) • >Time of observation • >Pressure Ulcer Stage (Stage table) • >Target Site (Pressure Point table) • >(May) Laterality*: left or right • >Dimensions • >Length • >Width • >Depth* • *Green font indicates updates

  15. Pressure Ulcer Observation updates • Plan of Care or Assessment Section • >Number of Pressure Ulcer by Type observation • >Time of observation • >Number of Pressure Ulcers (integer) • > Pressure Ulcer Stage • >“Highest Pressure Ulcer Stage” observation • >Time of observation • >Description of Tissue: necrotic eschar • *Green font indicates updates

  16. Discussion

More Related