1 / 29

ELEMENTS B 2019 POWER POINT SLIDES

ELEMENTS B 2019 POWER POINT SLIDES. Class #9: Friday, August 30 National Toasted Marshmallow Day. MUSIC: SERGEI PROKOFIEV, PETER & THE WOLF (1936) [3 WAYS] Narrators: David Bowie, STING, STERLING HOLLOWAY (Voice of Winnie-the-Pooh & Kaa ). STORMY WEATHER WHERE WE ARE

dfalk
Télécharger la présentation

ELEMENTS B 2019 POWER POINT SLIDES

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ELEMENTS B 2019POWER POINT SLIDES Class #9: Friday, August 30 National Toasted Marshmallow Day

  2. MUSIC: SERGEI PROKOFIEV, PETER & THE WOLF (1936) [3 WAYS]Narrators: David Bowie, STING, STERLING HOLLOWAY (Voice of Winnie-the-Pooh & Kaa) STORMY WEATHER • WHERE WE ARE • CHECK FOR E-MAILS & UPDATED COURSE PAGE FOR SCHEDULING INFO FOR WHEN SCHOOL REOPENS Briefing Assmts • Shaw Brief Probably Due Night Before Next Class Meeting; Can Do Sooner • Other Panels TBA; Self-Quizzes Posted Today • Qs on Instructions?

  3. FRIDAY Pop Culture Moment Between Shaw & Liesner Most Performed Waltz in American Popular Music

  4. Liesner DQ1.17: Oxygen What are “the superior advantages which the trial court had”? • Case doesn’t say • You need to try to figure out what court means • Will get easier with experience

  5. Liesner DQ1.17: Oxygen What are “the superior advantages which the trial court had”? • Visual Observation of Witnesses and of Physical Evidence • Hearing Testimony

  6. Sheaskedmetotakehertothedance.

  7. LiesnerDQ1.17: Oxygen What do these advantages suggest about the appropriate role of appellate courts in reviewing factual determinations made by “finders of fact” (juries or trial judges )?

  8. Liesner DQ1.17: Oxygen What do these advantages suggest about the appropriate role of appellate courts in reviewing factual determinations made by finders of fact? DEFERENCE!! See, e.g., tests for taking a case away from the jury: • Wisc 1914: “No reasonable doubts remain.” • Fed’l 2019: “No reasonable jury could find …”

  9. LiesnerBrief: Rationales • Not especially significant in a narrow case reviewing sufficiency of the evidence. • Might give “prevailing rule” as a doctrinal rationale. • Might give “superior advantages” as a policy rationale • Examples of each in Sample Brief posted after class today

  10. Liesner v. Wanie: Context 1914

  11. Liesner v. Wanie: Context 1914: Deaths • Joshua Lawrence Chamberlain (Civil War Hero) • John Muir (Naturalist) • Jacob Riis (Journalist/Author) • 19th Century Industrialists • CW Post (Grape Nuts & Other Cereals) • George Westinghouse (Railroad Brake and Electronics) • FrederikWeyerhauser (Timber & Paper)

  12. Liesner v. Wanie: Context 1914: Births • Alec Guiness • Joe Louis • Joe DiMaggio • Ralph Ellison • Danny Thomas • Dylan Thomas

  13. Liesner v. Wanie: Context 1914: Introduced in U.S. • term “Birth Control” (coined by Margaret Sanger) • First Blood Transfusion • Doublemint chewing gum • Elastic Brassiere • Federal Trade Commission • Company that will become Greyhound Bus • Mother’s Day (by Congr. Resolution)

  14. Liesner v. Wanie: Context 1914: Introduced in U.S. • New Republic Magazine • Panama Canal • Pygmalion by GB Shaw • Rookie Pitcher: Babe Ruth • Tarzan of the Apes • Teletype Machine • Traffic Lights using red-green signals

  15. Liesner v. Wanie: Context 1914: World War I 105 Years Ago Thursday: Sept. 5: 1st Battle of the Marne Begins • NE of Paris, French 6th Army Attacks Germans  Allied Victory (Keeps German Army out of Paris)

  16. Liesner v. Wanie: Context 1914: World War I 102 Years Ago Yesterday: Sept. 5: 1st Battle of the Marne Begins • NE of Paris, French 6th Army Attacks Germans  Allied “Victory” • Two Million Soldiers Participate

  17. Liesner v. Wanie: Context 1914: World War I 102 Years Ago Yesterday: Sept. 5: 1st Battle of the Marne Begins • NE of Paris, French 6th Army Attacks Germans  Allied “Victory” • Two Million Soldiers Participate • 500,000 Killed or Wounded

  18. Liesner v. Wanie: Context 1914: World War I Sept. 5: 1st Battle of the Marne Begins • NE of Paris, French Attacks Germans  Allied “Victory” • Two Million Soldiers Participate • 500,000 Killed or Wounded Dec. 24-25: Christmas Truce

  19. Liesner v. Wanie: Context 1914: World War I June 28: Archduke Francis-Ferdinand (Heir to the Austro-Hungarian Throne) Assassinated in Sarajevo: “The Shot Heard Round the World”

  20. Liesner v. Wanie Cf. “Some Shots Into a Brush Pile” (LiesnerTrial Transcript) featuring KRYPTON & URANIUM

  21. Liesner Trial Transcript Note Anderson testimony (p.17): “REPLEVIED” Suggests replevin was cause of action. (= Common law action for return of personal property)

  22. LiesnerTrial Transcript: DQ1.19: Best Evidence for Each Side (Krypton) Liesners’ Attys must have argued: • L-Boys did mortally wound wolf • L-Boys did continue pursuit (Uranium) Wanie’sAttys must have argued: • Uncertain that L-Boys mortally wounded wolf • L-Boys did not continue pursuit

  23. LiesnerTrial Transcript: DQ1.19: Best Evidence for Each Side (Krypton) Liesners’ Attys must have argued: • L-Boys did mortally wound wolf. Ev? • L-Boys did continue pursuit (Uranium) Wanie’sAttys must have argued: • Uncertain that L-Boys mortally wounded wolf • L-Boys did not continue pursuit

  24. LiesnerTrial Transcript: DQ1.19: Best Evidence for Each Side (Krypton) Liesners’ Attys must have argued: • L-Boys did mortally wound wolf • Comparing wounds and possible sources (ammo/direction) • Abdominal Wound likely Fatal • Behavior of Wolf • L-Boys did continue pursuit (Uranium) Wanie’sAttys must have argued: • Uncertain that L-Boys mortally wounded wolf. Ev? • L-Boys did not continue pursuit

  25. LiesnerTrial Transcript: DQ1.19: Best Evidence for Each Side (Krypton) Liesners’ Attys must have argued: • L-Boys did mortally wound wolf • L-Boys did continue pursuit. Ev? (Uranium) Wanie’sAttys must have argued: • Uncertain that L-Boys mortally wounded wolf • Lots of Shots/Wounds + Dog Bites • Wolves Hard to Kill • No Manure Inside Wolf • L-Boys did not continue pursuit

  26. LiesnerTrial Transcript: DQ1.19: Best Evidence for Each Side (Krypton) Liesners’ Attys must have argued: • L-Boys did mortally wound wolf • L-Boys did continue pursuit. • Boys run after wolf; F shoots into brush pile • Boys testify F told Wanie (Uranium) Wanie’sAttys must have argued: • Uncertain that L-Boys mortally wounded wolf • L-Boys did not continue pursuit. Ev?

  27. LiesnerTrial Transcript: DQ1.19: Best Evidence for Each Side (Krypton) Liesners’ Attys must have argued: • L-Boys did mortally wound wolf • L-Boys did continue pursuit. (Uranium) Wanie’sAttys must have argued: • Uncertain that L-Boys mortally wounded wolf • L-Boys did not continue pursuit. • Not very active attempts to enter brush pile • Ps didn’t claim from W (tho Trial Court says this is OK)

  28. Liesner Trial Transcript: DQ1.20Trial Judge’s Perspective • To make this decision, Judge must believe: • Abdomen shot was mortal wound (“gut shot”; wolf’s behavior) • Only shot that could have made that wound was Ed Liesner shot (bullet/angle) Questions/Concerns?

  29. Liesner Trial DQ1.20: Trial Judge’s Perspective • Trial Judge must have believed: • Abdomen shot was mortal wound (“gut shot”; wolf’s behavior) • Only evidence of shot that could have made that wound was Liesner shot (bullet/angle) • Keep in Mind • Judge might have experience with guns/hunting • Judge could see pelt & holes • Not every factual dispute is material to outcome. • Whether there was “manure” in abdominal cavity • Whether Wanie tried to hide bullet hole

More Related