1 / 7

HLG-MOS, Nizhny Novgorod, June 2014

Experiences with CSPA. HLG-MOS, Nizhny Novgorod, June 2014. CSPA status in Stat Netherlands. CSPA is rather new … SN participated in GSBPM, GSIM and CSPA efforts GSIM sprints 1, 2 & integration V1.0 GSIM sprint V1.1 CSPA Architecture Sprint

dian
Télécharger la présentation

HLG-MOS, Nizhny Novgorod, June 2014

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Experienceswith CSPA HLG-MOS, Nizhny Novgorod, June 2014

  2. CSPA status in Stat Netherlands • CSPA is rather new … • SN participated in GSBPM, GSIM and CSPA efforts • GSIM sprints 1, 2 & integration V1.0 • GSIM sprint V1.1 • CSPA Architecture Sprint • CSPA PoC: delivered(wrapped) a service • CSPA project 2014: willdeliver 3 services • Someadvocates, but general adoption byinternalorganisation is slow • SN does not have any CSPA compliant services in productionyet

  3. No CSPA services yet … Empty …

  4. CSPA is promising, but it does not … • … help to identify the “right” building blocks • … help solve the conflicts of interest (short – long term) • … help build trust in service providers • … tell us how to change behaviour • It’s hard to identify the scope and granularity of services • Business process owners have short term interests • Business process owners want total control over their process; therefor they are reluctant to “outsource” or become dependent on others for the execution of their process • Business and IT alike need to change (culture, behaviour) • Shared software and services need support

  5. Start at the business layer • Business processdevelopersneedto start designingprocesses in a different way. • Experience at SN shows thatthis in itselfdelivers benefits (MUST: 17.000 hrsrebuild -> 8.500 hrstotalredesign) • For this, processdevelopersneedtobe re-trained. • GSIM is not the first priority. GSBPM helps, but learningtothink in terms of “standard process steps” is key. • Re-use of building block “concepts” will help others, but requires change of behaviour: documenting, sharing

  6. IT comes next, but can start preparing • CSPA stillallows a lot of freedom, furtherstandardisation is neededfortechnical platforms andprotocols. • Most NSI’s do have theirown infra standards • Most NSI’s (like SN) do not have anorchestration infra • What approach forselecting the services toinvest in? • Darwinistic “survival of the fittest”, vs • Planned “blueprint” • CSPA investorrole? • Despitemanyattempts (MSIS) software sharing is not a major success …

  7. Summary • CSPA is stillrather new • SN is stillstrugglingtounderstandandfindan approach • Manyquestionsstillneedtobeanswered, manyobstaclesstilltobe taken, manyscepticstobeconvinced • But there is a growingnumber of people in SN thatbelieve in the potential, and the needfor change. • My advice is to start at the business layer: “business processredesign the CSPA way”.

More Related