1 / 69

Arbitrage and Finance

Arbitrage and Finance. Sendhil Mullainathan Economics 2030 Fall Lecture 5. Overview. Limits of Aribitrage Structure of mis -pricings Bubbles Equity Premium puzzle Volume . Overview. Limits of Aribitrage Structure of mis -pricings Bubbles Equity Premium puzzle Volume .

dima
Télécharger la présentation

Arbitrage and Finance

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Arbitrage and Finance Sendhil Mullainathan Economics 2030 Fall Lecture 5

  2. Overview • Limits of Aribitrage • Structure of mis-pricings • Bubbles • Equity Premium puzzle • Volume

  3. Overview • Limits of Aribitrage • Structure of mis-pricings • Bubbles • Equity Premium puzzle • Volume

  4. Limits of Arbitrage • Noise trader risk • Arbitrageurs have limited horizon • Agency costs • Problem can get worse before it gets better • Arbitrage has risk • Non-diversifiability is key • How to think about this? • Notice beauty of this paper: • No psychology

  5. Royal Dutch/Shell

  6. How do we think about non-diversifiability of this risk?

  7. Closed End Fund Discount

  8. Limits of Arbitrage • Not limits of arbitrage but dangers of arbitrage • Suppose traders’ have positive feedback • What should aribtrageurs do now?

  9. Hedge Funds and Internet

  10. Hedge Fund Performance

  11. Limits of Arbitrage • Transaction costs

  12. Palm-3 Com • 1999: 3Com announced it would spin off Palm • Stage 1: 3Com sold 4% of Palm in IPO • Stage 2: remaining shares would be distributed to 3Com shareholders • Each 3Com shareholder should get 1.5 Palm shares • Behavioral economics: • At end of IPO – • 3Com selling for $82. • Palm selling for $95 (got as high as $165). • What’s the problem here?

  13. Price3Com – 1.5 PricePalm

  14. Implementation Costs • Implementation Costs • Commission • Bid/Ask Spread • Price Impact • Short Sell Costs • Fees • Volume Constraints • Legal Restraints • Identification Cost • Mispricing ≠> Predictability

  15. Limits of Arbitrage • Noise Trader Risk • Implementation Costs • Fundamental Risk

  16. Index Inclusions • Stock Price Jumps Permanently • 3.5% Average • Fundamental Risk • Poor Substitutes (best R2 < 0.25)

  17. Limits of arbitrage • Efficient prices vs no arbitrage • Some key questions • Best aggregator of beliefs? • Note what short-sale constraints tells us in this context • Note what arbitrage literature tells us in this context • What would efficiency costs be?

  18. Prediction Markets

  19. Overview • Limits of Aribitrage • Structure of mis-pricings • Bubbles • Equity Premium puzzle • Volume

  20. Structure of Mispricings • Limits of Arbitrage tells us why mispricings may occur • The examples so far are somewhat generic • Is there structure to mispricings? • Should there be?

  21. Winners and Losers

  22. Broader effect • Not just winners and loser but also general statement about prices

  23. A very different effect

  24. Earnings Drift

  25. When it’s realized?

  26. Broader Version

  27. Momentum

  28. Structure of Mispricings • Rational Interpretation • Multi-factor models • Daniel Titman test

  29. Structure of Mispricings • Two sources of this structure • Arbitrage limits provide structure • Psychology of individuals provide structure • Three prominent models • BSV • DHW • HS

  30. Behavioral Models Barberis, Shleifer and Vishny (1998) Short-term gambler’s fallacy. Updating leads to long-term hot-hand belief. Daniel, Hirshleifer and Subrahmanyam (1998) A mix of biases Confirmation(self-serving bias) leads to short-term under-reaction Long-term over-reaction occurs because of correction This is an odd feature of these results. Hong-Stein Limited attention and two types of traders: fundamentals and trend-chasers But information diffuses slowly. So diffusion creates trends which trend-chasers over extrapolate

  31. Behavioral Models • Lots more to be done here. • Think of the wealth of data. • Simple models with testable predictions would be very high return. • Limited attention seems to re-appear often

  32. Overview • Limits of Aribitrage • Structure of mis-pricings • Bubbles • Equity Premium puzzle • Volume

  33. Bubbles • Another interesting area • A few observations:

  34. Bubbles • Another interesting area • A few observations: • There are a lot more bubbles than you might recognize • Bubbles appear to have structure

  35. Bubbles • Another interesting area • A few observations: • There are a lot more bubbles than you might recognize • Bubbles appear to have structure • Yet we have very little study of them • Are “bubbles” distinct? Or merely an arbitrary line on a continuum? • Can we measure sentiment directly?

  36. Overview • Limits of Aribitrage • Structure of mis-pricings • Bubbles • Equity Premium puzzle • Volume

  37. Consumption Model • Simple Euler equation • What if there are multiple assets? • How do we convert this to equity pricing?

  38. Equity pricing model

  39. Calibrating this model • Mehra Prescott, 1890-1979 • Rate of return on equity is about .06 • Std dev of consumption growth: .036 • Std dev of stock market: .167 • Correlation: .40 • Covariance: .0024 • Implies: =25

  40. Other estimates • Mankiw Zeldes: • 1948-1988, equity premium rises to 8% • Covariance goes down • Implies =91 • A  of 30 implies: • 50% chance to double wealth, 50% chance to have wealth fall by half • Would pay 49% of wealth to avoid this gamble

  41. Potential Explanations • Survivorship bias • 36 exchanges, ½ had interruptions or abolished • But note: 1929 stock crash • Other evidence: international equity premium • Learning over time • Possibly true • Equity premium may have permanently decreased • Won’t know for sure • Limited Participation • Intermediation costs?

  42. Observation • Original calculations • Rate of return on equity is about .06 • Std dev of consumption growth: .036 • Std dev of stock market: .167 • Correlation: .40 • Covariance: .0024 • Which value seems low?

More Related