1 / 17

Antra Carlsen Nordic Network for Adult Learning (NVL) nordvux

Quality issues in Validation in the Nordic countries and competence development of employees/staff involved in RPL . Antra Carlsen Nordic Network for Adult Learning (NVL) www.nordvux.net. Nordic Network for Adult Learning. Networks – bring prioritized policy areas in focus.

diza
Télécharger la présentation

Antra Carlsen Nordic Network for Adult Learning (NVL) nordvux

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Quality issues in Validation in the Nordic countries and competence development of employees/staff involved in RPL Antra Carlsen Nordic Network for Adult Learning (NVL) www.nordvux.net

  2. Nordic Network for Adult Learning

  3. Networks–bringprioritized policy areas in focus • NVL (11 thematic sub-networks) as a link between policy and practice, forum for dialogue and a development arena: • Flexibility in education (3 networks); • Workplace as a learning arena (2 networks) • Validation; Guidance Counseling ( 1 + 1 networks) • Innovation in education (4 networks)

  4. Why - formal learning – tip of the iceberg of learning • Sustainable development – everyone’s competences are imortant • Motivation for further studies • Mobility in the labour market (social, health services) • Inclusion of special target groups / employability • Self-confidence leading to new tasks, more responsibilities at work • Civic participation

  5. Nordic challenges • Recognition and validation of prior learning mostly used for entering education; less for shortening and module exemption • Used more in vocational education; less in further professional education and university level education • Insufficient public awareness, resistance and suspicion in relation to the educational system - not fully used potential of RPL • Lack of professional staff • Lack of economic stimulus for ed. institutions

  6. Professionalization – fair treatment, trust • Which practitioners are involved? • Which national strategies for recruitment and training of practitioners exist? • Which structures support professional development?

  7. Denmark • About 15 years experience: 1995 (labour market educations); 2000 (basic, primary level AE); 2007 (further education, college / univ. level) • Phase 1 – mapping, identification of competences. The competence lies within the non-formal adult education sector (folkbildning) • Phase 2 – documentation • Phase 3 – recognition is being done by the formal education sector

  8. Finland • Assessor training programmewith a strongfocuson system, less ontheprocess • New nitiativesince 2011, a training program for APL; developedwithin an EU Social Fund project “Development ofcompetencies in eastern Finland”; level5 in theEQF, 6 ECTS credits • Four compulsorymodules: APL concept and EQF, qualityof APL, APL in a nationalcontext, and onemoduleaccording to theparticipantsownchoice

  9. Norway • RPL carried out by specialists, no formal requirements for special education • University College Akershus: a coursewithin prior learningassessment at 30 ECTS credits (a part-time study over twoterms) and is open to all • Region ofNordland: competencedevelopmentofemployeesthrougha network • Special budget for meetings, courses and conferences; 1 – 2 yearlymeetings

  10. Sweden • Most ofthe staff workingwith APL arestudy and vocationalguidancecounselors • Professionals workingwiththeindustry-specificvalidations • APL would be implemented at its best ifthesubjectbecame part oftheteacher training programmes • Competencedevelopmentofthecurrentactivestaff for betterawarenesson formal and informallearning

  11. Iceland • Education and Training Service Centre (ETSC) is the developer of a national strategy for validation in Iceland • ETSC is responsible for the quality assurance of the validation process as well as the training of assessors • Advisable for the counsellor and assessor to receive training in operational procedures for validation; course (15 lessons) helpsto meetincreasingdemand for validation

  12. Iceland: two internet-based studies Responses: • “Great to get this opportunity to get started, something you have dreamt about for so long.” • “Obviously a lot of things have changed since I was in school. For example I didn’t know what a great work counselors do.” • “I would never have gone back to school if there hadn’t been a group for me to join. It gave me a lot of strength to know that I wasn’t alone.”

  13. Did the validation process meet your expectations?

  14. How was the counseling during validation?

  15. Nordic Quality model

  16. Next steps • Efforts made for developing validation in practice, further development could be expected also when it comes to research • Results are still small in scope and rather scattered: improve formal educational level and employability, mobility and flexibility in private sector, e.g. banking, finance, and industry; in the public sector, e.g. among paramedics and mail staff • Need to know more about the effects at personal, social and economic levels

  17. Networks as a resource meeting and learning place initiate development work suggest new policy initiatives www.nordvux.net

More Related