1 / 7

Free-Air Carbon Dioxide Enrichment – FACE

Free-Air Carbon Dioxide Enrichment – FACE. BERAC review of DOE-funded experiments (’07) ORNL FACE Duke Forest FACE (FACTS I) Rhinelander Aspen FACE (FACTS II) Nevada Desert FACE (NDFF) SERC* (Open Top Chamber Experiments) Florida scrub oak Maryland salt marsh.

dmangold
Télécharger la présentation

Free-Air Carbon Dioxide Enrichment – FACE

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Free-Air Carbon Dioxide Enrichment – FACE • BERAC review of DOE-funded experiments (’07) • ORNL FACE • Duke Forest FACE (FACTS I) • Rhinelander Aspen FACE (FACTS II) • Nevada Desert FACE (NDFF) • SERC* (Open Top Chamber Experiments) • Florida scrub oak • Maryland salt marsh

  2. Results of BERAC Review (cont.) • Need for data sharing and management - CDIAC • Especially relevant given decommissioning schedule • Data archive • Data accessibility for synthesis research • FACE Data Management Workshop -2008 • Data issues and concerns • Many individual researchers at each facility • Anticipated needs of data users (modelers, etc.) • Development of a centralized FACE website

  3. Website development (http://public.ornl.gov/face) • General information about FACE • Listing of Global FACE Experiments • Contact information • Site Specifics • Key publications for decommissioned sites • Site information and data (DOE) • CO2 and Weather • Plant Response • Soils • Site characterization • Publications • Links to individual websites

  4. Development of a relational database • MS SQL platform • Initial development for AmeriFlux • AmeriFlux, FACE, SPRUCE, LeafWeb… • Benefits • Single architecture for development and maintenance • Consistent variable naming convention • Transparency to users interested in synthesis

  5. Data preparation and ingest • Data challenges • Tailoring variable naming convention to fit existing AmeriFlux standards • File format variations (sites/years/data types) • Variable naming conventions that vary between sites, years, and data types • Recording interval variations • Time • Location • Limited metadata • Funding for many projects has ended • Value-added activity

  6. Data preparation and ingest (cont.) • Resolve data inconsistencies and put into a common format for ingest. * • Develop global variable list following review and formatting of all data. * • Final review of variable list to check for consistency and adherence to standards of scientific community. • Revise data as necessary. • Begin data ingest.

  7. Future plans • Value-added derivative data products • Example: gap-filled meteorological data • Data interface (ex: AmeriFlux) • Expand data holdings to include: • global FACE sites • warming and other global change experiments • Example: Hot Serial Cereal Experiment-Maricopa,AZ • Results of meta-analysis research projects • Other- TBD

More Related