1 / 19

Benchmarks, Dashboards and Quality Indicators:  ACGME Outcomes Phases 3 and 4

Benchmarks, Dashboards and Quality Indicators:  ACGME Outcomes Phases 3 and 4. CORD 2010 Felix Ankel , Eric Perterson , David Griffen. Setting the Stage Felix Ankel. Positioning EM Residency as a Strategic Asset

doctor
Télécharger la présentation

Benchmarks, Dashboards and Quality Indicators:  ACGME Outcomes Phases 3 and 4

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Benchmarks, Dashboards and Quality Indicators:  ACGME Outcomes Phases 3 and 4 CORD 2010 Felix Ankel, Eric Perterson, David Griffen

  2. Setting the StageFelix Ankel • Positioning EM Residency as a Strategic Asset • Goal is to develop a dashboard of outcomes for phase III and IV outcome project that is consistent with hospital quality goals

  3. Setting the StageDavid Griffen • Overview of outcome project • Work so far • Importance and feasibility • Hospital and residency perspectives about outcomes • Outcomes are data to be analyzed and explained • Can we develop outcomes of resident/residency involvement and effectiveness in process improvement?

  4. Setting the StageEric Peterson • Learning to speak “hospital” • Value = Quality/Cost • ED throughputs will be a reported outcome • Sample Residency Dashboard

  5. Scorecard

  6. Scorecard

  7. Scorecard

  8. DiscussionFelix Ankel • Advantages of positioning GME as a strategic asset • “Residency Quality Officer” = Assistant Residency Coordinator • Potential mixed messages to residents when looking at throughput times and patients per hour • Issues with attribution • Potential problems getting certain hospital data

  9. Specific Outcomes

  10. Additional Outcomes • Pain management • Time to management, effectiveness of management • Peer-reviewed publications • Number of charts down-coded • Documenting re-assessment • pain • Interventions • Etc.

  11. Idea • Create a longitudinal administrative curriculum over 3 years with specific goals, objectives, and evaluations. • Understand complex hospital systems • Process improvement

  12. Concern • Big group concern is heterogeneity among residency programs. How do you compare quality measures across programs? • Maybe dashboards as external comparisons are not going to work right now. • All quality is local

  13. Possible Dashboard Format

  14. Wrap-Up • Dashboards are here • CORD can take the leadership in developing dashboards for residencies • Practical reasons to align strategic priorities with our partners • Not yet ready for a universal dashboard • Sharing data • Develop menu of outcomes and sample dashboards • Collaboration

  15. http://emdashboards.pbworks.com/

  16. http://emdashboards.pbworks.com/

  17. Next Steps • If interested please join the WIKI • Plan on sending out an invitation on the CORD listserve • Generate a discussion on the WIKI • Share data, outcomes and dashboards • Examples of outcome measures • Examples of dashboards • Bring back to CORD next year • Publication

More Related