1 / 17

Towards a Model of Engaged Research

The Nuevo South Community Research Initiative. Towards a Model of Engaged Research. Ricardo B. Contreras David Griffith East Carolina University Merida, March 2010. Goal of the Presentation. Program Theory Method Projects Conclusions, lessons learned, and challenges. The Program.

donat
Télécharger la présentation

Towards a Model of Engaged Research

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Nuevo South Community Research Initiative Towards a Model of Engaged Research Ricardo B. Contreras David Griffith East Carolina University Merida, March 2010

  2. Goal of the Presentation • Program • Theory • Method • Projects • Conclusions, lessons learned, and challenges

  3. The Program The central goal of the NSCRI is to develop a sustainable engaged research partnership with grassroots organizations and providers working with/serving the Latino community of eastern North Carolina and the southeast. This implies the following: • To conduct research on subject-matters of relevance to community partners. • To work with community partners in applying research findings to program implementation. • To develop strategies and methodologies articulating action and research. • To become a space for practice, program, and policy reflection and analysis.

  4. The Theory • Applied anthropology • Make research useful to communities • Research problem shaped by community needs • Community engagement • Sustainable relationship university-community • Balanced reciprocity in relationship • Participatory action-research • Action and research are intertwined • Community participation in research activities • University partners participate in action projects

  5. The Method • Within the university • Build synergy around the need to conduct collaborative research on issues related to the Latino community. • Partner with faculty from different colleges and departments on specific engaged research projects. • Incorporate students in service-learning activities through formal internships, course-work, theses, or volunteering. • Constitute a space for analysis and reflection on applied research, Latino issues, and community engagement. • Build website to socialize the NSCI beyond the local community. • With the community • Identify grassroots community groups or formal organizations that would benefit from partnering with the university on action-research activities. • Develop strong links with community organizations supporting them in grant writing, project implementation, and applying research findings to action processes. • Work with community organizations to identify areas for action-research . • Conduct research activities in constant dialogue with community partners.

  6. The Projects Ethnography of community engagement

  7. The Projects: Latino Entrepreneurship Study • Engagement model: • Study was conceived and implemented by university partners • Study findings are translated into applications in partnership with local grassroots organizations. • The project: • To examine Latino entrepreneurship practices and culture in new destination communities • To implement intervention processes to strengthen Latino entrepreneurship in the studied communities. • Funded by the US Department of Agriculture. • Coverage area: North Carolina and Iowa • Applications: • Community workshops • Training activities with youth • Educational material development & work with public schools • Website

  8. The Projects:Youth Civic Engagement • Engagement model: • Study was conceived and implemented in collaboration with local community organization. • University partners wrote the funding proposal. • Fiscal agent was the community organization. • University partners in charge of program evaluation and report writing. • The project: • To develop youth groups in four communities of eastern North Carolina. • Funded by the Civic Education Consortium of North Carolina. • Coverage area: two counties in eastern North Carolina. • Applications: • The project itself was an application: establishment of youth • Formative research in the form of process evaluation. • Encourage youth to develop their own initiatives (dance groups, garbage collection) • Awareness of the potential for empowerment among both youth and parents

  9. The ProjectsCommunity Health Advisors • Engagement model: • Study was conceived and implemented in collaboration with local community organization. • University partners wrote the funded proposal. • Fiscal agent is the community organization. • University partners in charge of program evaluation and report writing. • In practice, although not planned, university partners in charge of program implementation. • The project: • To develop a community health advisor program to promote physical activity and healthy nutrition in the Latino community of Pitt County. • Funding from the Pitt Memorial Hospital Foundation. • Coverage area: Pitt County • Applications: • Train a group of five Latino women as community health advisors. • Promote physical activity and healthy nutrition through the women’s natural social networks. • Formative research in the form of process evaluation. • Deepening of partnerships within the university (e.g. for future research and community outreach).

  10. The Projects:Oral Histories of Latino Leaders • Engagement model: • Study was conceived and is being implemented by university partners. • University partners wrote the funded proposal. • Proposal presented to community organization for feedback. • Fiscal agent is the university. • The project: • To study leadership in the Latino community of eastern North Carolina through the examination of the histories of 15 Latino civic leaders. • Oral history as a method. • Funding from the North Carolina Humanities Council. • Coverage: eastern North Carolina. • Applications: (in collaboration with grassroots organizations) • Activities to celebrate the Latino contributions to their local communities • Role models to Latino youth • Collection at the university library • A “Latino Social History House”

  11. The Projects: Ethnography of Community Engagement • Engagement model: • Study was conceived by university partner. • Fiscal agent is university partner. • The community engagement process is the object of study. • The project: • Goal: To study the theory, practice, and community impact of the NSCRI engaged research program. • Funding from the university office of community engagement. • Coverage: the projects implemented by the NSCRI. • Applications: • A model of engaged research with the Latino community. • Recommendations on engaged research through policy briefs.

  12. Conclusions, Lessons Learned and Challenges • Research-Practice Relationship • Roles participants • Methodology

  13. Conclusions: Research-Practice Relationship • Research and practice can be articulated in different ways, and still be engaged research: • Research to identify need or areas for intervention (needs assessment/asset mapping). • Research to illuminate interventions (formative research/evaluation). • Research not immediately connected to practice but whose findings will either be translated into interventions or serve to identify the need for interventions (“traditional” research).

  14. Conclusions: Roles • University partners: • Project-related roles: • Write proposals for community organization for intervention projects • Assist in the implementation of projects (with varied levels of involvement) • Research and report writing • Collaboration-related roles: • Cultivate relationships with community partners (engagement) • Identify new partners • Socialize the need for engaged research in the university community • Involve faculty and students

  15. Conclusions: Roles (continued) • Community partners: • Project-related roles: • Linkage with community participants • Organization of community events: e.g., forums, focus groups, health fairs • Project administration (with varied levels of involvement) • Collaboration-related roles: • Connection with funding sources • The politics of collaboration

  16. Conclusions: Roles-Challenges (continued) • There is a tension between the informality of the grassroots community organization and the formality of the university partners. • This tension is a matter of cross-cultural (mis) understanding. • The university partner needs to approach collaboration from the perspective of the “ethnographer”: student of a culture (challenging in an action-research context).

  17. Lessons Learned: Methodology • Engagement is a form of participant observation: • Effort to blur the boundaries that separate the academic from the community world. • Break down with verticality in the academic-community relationship. • Trust. • Dynamic process of attachment and detachment. • Engagement is challenging: • Us learning the culture of the community; them learning the culture of the university. • Culture: the values, beliefs, and practices that structure community work and project management/administration. • Engagement implies risks: • Unwanted involvement in community conflicts. • Making informal certain aspects of the relationship that must remain formal.

More Related