1 / 14

The low frequency Galactic polarisation foreground

The low frequency Galactic polarisation foreground. Xiaohui Sun & Wolfang Reich MPIfR 23.05.2011. foreground polarisation causes trouble. Galactic foreground. 1 rad m -2  229 deg at 150 MHz. 0.15% Leakage of PI to I (dotted) + reionisation (solid). Jelic et al. 2010.

donny
Télécharger la présentation

The low frequency Galactic polarisation foreground

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The low frequency Galactic polarisation foreground Xiaohui Sun & Wolfang Reich MPIfR23.05.2011

  2. foreground polarisation causes trouble Galactic foreground 1 rad m-2 229 deg at 150 MHz 0.15% Leakage of PI to I (dotted) + reionisation (solid) Jelic et al. 2010

  3. WSRT observations at 150MHz • Fan region • 8 bands: • 139.3 141.5 143.7 • 145.9 148.1 150.3 • 152.5 154.7 • bandwidth: • 2.5 MHz • Frequency resolution: • 9.8 kHz (tapering) • Resolution (PI): • 4.2 arcmin • 1 mJy/beam = 1 K • rms fluctuation: ~ 7 K Bernardi et al. 2009

  4. learn from observations: RM synthesis from Heald Brentjens & de Bruyn 2005

  5. −9 −8 −7 • data: • Bernardi et al. (2009) • RM synthesis software: • Brentjens • clean software: • Heald −4 −6 −5 • φ: • −9 – 2 rad m-2 • resolution: • 3.44 rad m-2 • max φ extent: • 0.85 rad m-2 −3 −2 −1 0 1 2

  6. Missing large-scale components • 2 – 4 K at 408 MHz • (Brouw & Spoelstra 1976) • spectral index of –2.5 •  24 – 49 K at 150 MHz • Faraday depth very small • (Spoelstra 1984) • φ<0.8 rad m-2 • otherwise depolarisation •  assuming φ=0 Structures not influenced if |φ|>2 rad m-2

  7. −9 −8 −7 −6 −5 −4 −3 −2 A ring structure!

  8. Properties of the ring structure -- centre-filled to ring-like -- intensity twice as the surrounding -- inner radius about 1 degree -- outer radius of about 2 degree An emission feature? NO! -- the intrinsic φ~0 -- only appear at certain φ

  9. HAMMURABI code (Waelkens et al. 2009) Understanding observations by simulations 3D-emssion models Sun et al. 2008; Sun & Reich 2009; Sun & Reich 2010 pixel • Code modifications • Cartesian coordinates • Output RM cubes directly • Add faraday screens • Zoom-in of a patch

  10. Observations imply a Faraday screen • FD from Simulations • negative • monotonously decreasing • versus distance • Constrains on FS • positive • smaller at centre • FD • too large • too small • distance • too far • too near

  11. FS facts D: 200-250 pc R: 6.4 pc Shell: 2 pc Φ: 1.5--3.7 rad m-2 -- RM synthesis ~ 1/λ2min maximal FD extent 0.85 rad m-2 needs frequency > 400 MHz (Effelsberg 300-800 MHz GMIMS survey) -- Geometry of the FS multi-FSs? (Bernardi et al. 2009)

  12. Previous observations Haverkorn et al. 2003 Schnitzeler et al. 2007 Difficulties observations: influence of large-scale emission simulations: add local emission

  13. Summary • Nature of the FS • related with the star HD 20336 • -- B2V • -- D: 246±37 pc (parallax) • -- wind-blow bubble? • although disfavored by Haverkorn et al. (2003) • not clear • -- a magnetic structure (Haverkorn et al. 2003) • need 300-800MHz observations (GMIMS) • RM synthesis + simulations can constrain distance • and other parameters! • nature of FSs remains unclear

  14. Thank you!谢谢!

More Related