1 / 16

Update on Development of a Method to Assess PIBI Goal Attainment

Update on Development of a Method to Assess PIBI Goal Attainment. Claire Buchanan (ICPRB) TMAW meeting October 5, 2006. PIBI Goal. Living Resources Subcommittee (LRSC) approved a PIBI interim goal of 4.0 on a 1.0 - 5.0 scale at its January 26, 2006 meeting

drew
Télécharger la présentation

Update on Development of a Method to Assess PIBI Goal Attainment

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Update on Development of a Method to Assess PIBI Goal Attainment Claire Buchanan (ICPRB) TMAW meeting October 5, 2006

  2. PIBI Goal • Living Resources Subcommittee (LRSC) approved a PIBI interim goal of 4.0 on a 1.0 - 5.0 scale at its January 26, 2006 meeting • high level of biological integrity is certain • very low risk of harmful algal blooms • assoc. WQ meets SAV habitat requirements • commensurate with Ches Bay water clarity and DO criteria attainment • LRSC did not establish how attainment of a PIBI goal of 4.0 should be measured

  3. PIBI Goal Currently exploring options for measuring attainment of PIBI Goal Objectives: • Attainment of the PIBI goal should reflect attainment of a restored Bay and the WQ criteria • “Apples to apples” goals for Benthic, SAV and Phytoplankton

  4. The 2005 “Bay Health Index” (BHI)presently compares “apples to oranges” single multi- multi- metric metric metric

  5. Some Background • PIBI > 4.0 are not uncommon • 435 (9.4%) of 4647 records from CBP biomonitoring stations, 1984 - 2005 • Highest PIBI values are transient at this stage of Chesapeake Bay restoration • PIBIs in a segment can fluctuate two or more scale units in a year • slight declining trend is evident… • Highest PIBI are commensurate with water clarity and DO criteria attainment

  6. Measuring Attainment of PIBI Goal • Goal Option 1 “(all) PIBI scores at a Chesapeake Bay biomonitoring station must be between 4.0 and 5.0 for the station to pass.” • comparable to approaches used for SAV & original BIBI goals • PIBI > 4.0 more difficult to attain than BIBI > 3.0 • attainment reflects a very superior phytoplankton community and a fully restored Bay • each station (aka segment) passes or fails individually 2005 all segments fail

  7. Measuring Attainment of PIBI Goal • Goal Option 2 “the bay-wide area-weighted mean score must be > 4.0 for the entire Bay to pass.” • average the 6 monthly mean scores in each segment, weight by segment’s proportional area, and sum to obtain the bay-wide mean • annual bay-wide score is biased by largest segments • goal can be attained even when smaller segments regularly fail 2005 Bay mean = 2.94, or Fair

  8. Measuring Attainment of PIBI Goal • Goal Option 3 “the area-weighted frequency of PIBI values between 4.0 and 5.0 must be greater than some predetermined percentage for the entire Bay to pass.” • uses frequency rather than mean • weight each segment’s attainment frequency (n = 6-12) by segment’s proportional area, sum to obtain bay-wide attainment frequency • Bay score is biased by largest segments • method used in 2005 Health and Restoration Assessment because a single Bay # was requested 2005 Bay freq. of attain. = 9.8%

  9. Measuring Attainment of PIBI Goal • Goal Option 4 “the mean annual score of the station or stations within a CBP segment must be > 4.0 for the segment to pass." • uses mean rather than frequency • each segment passes or fails individually • removes area-weighting bias in annual score • more in line with how WQ criteria and SAV & BIBI goal attainment are measured 2005 …CB5 mean = 3.75

  10. Measuring Attainment of PIBI Goal • Goal Options 1 – 4 • propose either a threshold (1, 3) or a mean (2, 4) for evaluating PIBI values • Chesapeake Bay Aquatic Life Uses • sample values are compared to reference distributions (CFDs) or historic benchmarks to assess attainment • Phyto. reference communities (1984-2005) • PIBI distributions for least-impaired WQ conditions currently found in Chesapeake Bay, not PIBI distributions in fully restored Bay with long uninterrupted periods of good WQ & robust grazer populations • mean PIBI ≈ 3.4

  11. Measuring Attainment of PIBI Goal • Six segment-years in 1984-2005 phytoplankton monitoring data have segment annual mean of PIBI > 4.0 (Option 4) • N=39 • lowest PIBI was 3.0 • No sig. diff. betw. MH and PH Could be a reference curve, or baseline

  12. Measuring Attainment of PIBI Goal • Goal Option 5 “a segment passes if at least two of three criteria are met: • annual average of monthly mean PIBI scores is > 4.0, • none (or only one) of monthly mean PIBI scores is below 3.0, or • PIBI sample distribution is not significantly different from the baseline PIBI distribution (Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, p > 0.10).” 2005 17.6% of goal attained (CB5 is 17.6% of sampled segments)

  13. Percent Attainment of PIBI Goal ____Option 3 (avg. = 14.3%) in 2005 Report ____Option 5 (avg. = 25.6%)

  14. The 2005 “Bay Health Index” (BHI) Option 5 puts us closer to “apples to apples” • SAV Goal: segment acreage meets or exceeds historic baseline (minimum) • Benthos Goal(s): several methods that use BIBI > 3.0 or a reference distribution as criteria • Phytoplankton Option 5: segment meets at least two of three criteria (mean PIBI > 4.0, min PIBI > 3.0, sample distribution ≈ baseline distribution)

  15. single multi- multi- metric metric metric  DO? “Degraded Area Method” (303d)? (Llanso & Volstad 2006) ?  water clarity  DO  Chl a Option 5 Option 3 The 2005 “Bay Health Index” (BHI)  water clarity

  16. 2005

More Related