1 / 15

balticseacommission /

CPMR Baltic Sea Commission Transport Working Group. www.balticseacommission.org /. www.cpmr.org/.

dympna
Télécharger la présentation

balticseacommission /

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CPMRBaltic Sea CommissionTransport Working Group www.balticseacommission.org/ www.cpmr.org/ Pan-Baltic visions of transport developmentSebastian Schröder, State Secretary Ministry for Transport, Building and Regional Development Mecklenburg-VorpommernChairman of CPMR-BSC Transport Working GroupTransBaltic Conference 2010, Malmö, 17.03.2010„The New Geography of Freight Flows in the Baltic Sea Region“ Transpolar Railway between Salekhard and Nadym (Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug) Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salekhard%E2%80%93Igarka_Railway

  2. Background for transport visions: Features of the Baltic Sea Region • “Northern Dimension“ • Harsh climate (may change slowly with global warming) • Low population density / long average distances • High average wages (at least in the North) •  Higher costs, need for efficiency; special role of air transport • Raw materials (ores, wood & pulp) in the North •  High-volume freight transport flows in parts of the region Icebreaker "Arkona" and freighter "SOSNOGORSK" on 03.03.2010 near Stralsund. Source: http://www.spiegel.de/fotostrecke/fotostrecke-52557-2.html

  3. Background for transport visions: Features of the Baltic Sea Region • “Eastern Dimension“ • High growth rates in Eastern parts (PL, LT, LV, EE, RU) • Important current and future role of Russia • „Administrative bottlenecks“ at EU external borders • Potential as gateway to Asia •  High potential, but several uncertainties Trucks waiting at the Finnish-Russian border. Source: http://www.sptimes.ru/index.php?action_id=4&photo_id=8280

  4. Background for transport visions: Features of the Baltic Sea Region • “Maritime dimension“ • Importance of maritime transport • Environmental issues (CO2, SOx, …) • Safety issues (ISPS code, maritime safety, …) •  Efficient and competitive maritime transport is a pure necessity for several national economies in the Baltic Sea Region – this should be reflected in transport strategies Port of Sassnitz. Source:Nordlicht / Thomas Häntzschel

  5. Background: EU Transport Policy

  6. Background:Transport market realities Source: OPTIMAR - Benchmarking strategic options for European shipping and for the European maritime transport system in the horizon 2008-2018. FINAL REPORT, p. 45. Download at http://ec.europa.eu/transport/maritime/studies/index_en.htm

  7. Selected transport visionsfor the Baltic Sea Region • National ministries for transport • No visible „transport master plan“ • However: Involved e.g. in launching calls for the EU „Motorways of the Sea“ programme, in the TEDIM initiative (Telematics in Foreign Trade Logistics and Delivery Management), ... • New Northern Dimension Transport and Logistics Partnership (NDPTL); will be fully operational from 2011 on, starting with an action plan focused on major transnational transport infrastructure •  So far concentrated on few strategic issues; NDPTL could be starting point for broader cooperation

  8. Selected transport visionsfor the Baltic Sea Region • Some VASAB key messages • Cross-border deficits in road + rail infrastructure – should be tackled during TEN-T revision process • More frequent air (passenger) transport is crucial for cohesion • Continue and enhance Motorways of the Sea, include Russian ports • More traffic separation schemes •  Highly relevant issues

  9. Selected transport visionsfor the Baltic Sea Region • Baltic Development Forum (BDF) • BDF established Nov 1998 to represent private sector interests, BDF Round Table (on transport) established Oct 2002 • Mandate: „Discuss the private sector priorities for development of the transport sector and infrastructure in the Baltic Sea Region“ • Final report and recommendations: Oct 2005 („Intelligent Transport and Infrastructure in the Baltic Sea Region – An innovative key to future growth and prosperity“) •  No individual infrastructure projects, rather strategic issues from business point of view

  10. Selected transport visionsfor the Baltic Sea Region • Baltic Development Forum (BDF) key messages • Starting point: Neither transport infrastructure nor institutional framework in the Baltic Sea region can meet today‘s or future expectations. • Five priority areas for action: • Promote new ways of financing transport infrastructure => user charging • Develop multimodal transport system based on unitised cargo • Strenghten further Motorways of the Sea • Develop highly frequent, cheap and flexible air passenger transport • Harmonise legal and administrative conditions

  11. Selected transport visionsfor the Baltic Sea Region • Conference of Peripheral Maritime Regions, Baltic Sea Commission (CPMR-BSC) • Network of ~160 European regions representing ~200 mill. People; Baltic Sea Commission: ~30 regions • 2003, 2009: Major contributions to Trans-European Transport Network policy (TEN-T) • Currently: Follows closely process of TEN-T revision and – in general – EU transport policies •  „Antenna“ of regions in Brussels

  12. Selected transport visionsfor the Baltic Sea Region • CPMR-BSC key messages • 2003: Take Baltic perspective into account in TEN-T revision process; implement Nordic Triangle, MoS, Bothnian Corridor • 2009: • Cost-benefit approach in defining TEN-T core network will not be enough • Take maritime dimension into account: Taking a ferry must be as easy as to use a bridge • Funding schemes must be less bureaucratic • More attention for „administrative bottlenecks“ • More attention for Northern Transport Axis • Baltic Sea Region as gateway for global freight transport •  Integrate infrastructure and service perspective 2003

  13. Selected transport visionsfor the Baltic Sea Region • EU Baltic Sea Strategy – „Strategic“ and „cooperative“ actions • Coordinate national transport policies and infrastructure investments • Improve the connections with Russia and other neighbouring countries • Facilitate efficient overall Baltic freight transport and logistics solutions • Increase the role of the Baltic Sea in the transport systems of the region • Promote sustainable passenger and freight transport and facilitate the shift to intermodality •  No surprise, takes up stakeholders‘ views – but huge tasks

  14. Conclusions I • Several “visions” and “strategies” for transport development in the Baltic Sea Region have been developed, by administration / business, on regional / national / EU level • Most strategies have only self-binding character, exception: EU Baltic Sea Strategy • Even more cooperation fora, even more strategies:Northern Dimension Partnership on Transport and Logistics  Do we need yet more strategies?

  15. Conclusions II • No need for new strategies. Time to act is now. • Anyway: EU policies will continue to develop, EU-Russia cooperation will hopefully be boosted by Northern Dimension. • More cooperation between public and private sector is needed. • Implementation: “Pick low-hanging fruits”

More Related