1 / 8

Mesh Capacity WG

Mesh Capacity WG. Outline. Technologies What band(s) should we use? What antennas should we use? What architecture should we use? Closed platforms are a pressing problem Goals: What do we need? Evaluation Repeatability is a major concern What should we be repeating?. Frequency choice.

edda
Télécharger la présentation

Mesh Capacity WG

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Mesh Capacity WG

  2. Outline • Technologies • What band(s) should we use? • What antennas should we use? • What architecture should we use? • Closed platforms are a pressing problem • Goals: What do we need? • Evaluation • Repeatability is a major concern • What should we be repeating?

  3. Frequency choice • Design space is huge • What radio technology gives what data rate in what propagation environment? • Do we need to lobby FCC for lower frequency range, or can we achieve our goals without this? • Channel and source coding schemes • Includes rate selection, error correction, multipath resilience • Many permutations are unexplored in a systems context • Additional complications: space-time codes, etc.

  4. Antennas and Scalability • Steerable Antennas work outside, not indoors • Would a simple SVD replacement to steering be enough for indoors? • Transmitter power control yields what gain? • How much better is MIMO? • Cognitive radios yield what gain? • Wideband communication is still poorly understood in many ways!

  5. Architecture • Closed platforms are a pressing limitation! • Everyone wants hardware where they can do arbitrary interesting things, but keep everything else • Promising approaches: • Software radios: high end that can emulate a large variety of low ends • FPGAs/ASICs (a la Berkeley proposal) • How do we define interfaces that allow cross-layer innovation?

  6. What do we need? • 1Mbps/user would rock!

  7. Lack of repeatability is a major concern • Is simulation necessary for benchmarks? • Would a new model be enough to achieve fidelity? Is anyone making progress on this? • Does physical emulation yield a better tradeoff between repeatability and realism? • E.g., recent CMU research using DSPs between the wires • Is a testbed necessary? • If so, does this need to be a shared investment? What scale is interesting? What radios are interesting? How to achieve repeatability? • Innovation at all levels of protocol stack  benchmark needs to allow change at all levels • E.g., try a new MAC/PHY/both • We need both a simulator that is validated against reality and testbeds.

  8. What benchmarks are good? • Strawman proposal • In-home Mesh • Community Mesh (neighbor to neighbor) • 2 Tropos scenarios • End users funneling into ITAP • Police cars funneling into ITAP • PacketHop scenario • Incident command center • Darpa scenario • Tanks and Helicopters and things • What other scenarios?

More Related