1 / 26

ETC/CCA Planning Meeting 11 September 2014 Climate change indicators &

ETC/CCA Planning Meeting 11 September 2014 Climate change indicators & 2016 climate impacts report. Hans-Martin Füssel. →. 2016. 2012. ?. EEA (climate impact) indicators.

edison
Télécharger la présentation

ETC/CCA Planning Meeting 11 September 2014 Climate change indicators &

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. ETC/CCA Planning Meeting 11 September 2014 Climate change indicators & 2016 climate impacts report Hans-Martin Füssel

  2. 2016 2012 ?

  3. EEA (climate impact) indicators • “a measure, generally quantitative, that can be used to illustrate and communicate complex environmental phenomena simply, including trends and progress over time” • EEA indicator comprises a specification and assessment(s) • Usually quantitative data on observed changes and projections • Includes information on uncertainties (where relevant) • Severalpossiblepolicypurposes • Well-defined quality criteria • Published on the EEA website, in EEA (indicator-based) reports and in Climate-ADAPT • Support development of adaptation policies

  4. Policy purposes of EEA climate indicators • Tracing global climate change(informing climate change mitigation): e.g. global mean temperature, ocean heat content • Tracing regional climate hazards (informing climate risk management): e.g. regional sea level, extreme precipitation • Assessing the sensitivity of ecosystems and society: e.g. species distribution, agricultural phenology • Assessing the effectiveness of risk management: e.g. floods and health, losses from extreme events • Policy purpose has implications among others for required spatial coverage and resolution of indicator

  5. Quality criteria for EEA indicators Thematic and policy relevance: Sensitive to climate change, relevant for policy development (but note different policy purposes) and easily understandable Full geographic coverage: Ideally Europe (EEA-33 or EEA-39) or other relevant area(s) Appropriate geographical aggregation (where relevant): Countries, regional seas, etc. Long time series: Depending on the topic (for climate change at least 30 years); possibly including projections (in particular for climate change) Reliable data supply: Priority data flows or other institutional arrangement/guarantee Clear methodology: Methodology is clearly described and repeatable 5

  6. Indicator selection for the 2012 CCIV report • Most indicators were „inherited“ from the 2008 EEA CCIV report • Discussion with authors (first) and Advisory Group (later) on addition and deletion of indicators • Formal assessment of all existing and proposed indicators by authors and (independently) by ETC-CCA according to established criteria • Final decision by authors and Advisory Group

  7. Changes from 2008 to 2012 CCIV report

  8. Publication on the EEA website http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators#c5=climate&c7=all&c0=10&b_start=0

  9. Publication in Climate-ADAPT

  10. 2012 EEA climate impacts report • Coordination by the European Environment Agency (EEA) • Authors and contributors (total 90): • EEA and 3 European Topic Centres (CCA, ICM, BD) • Joint Research Centre (European Commission) • World Health Organisation Europe • European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control • Guidanceby Advisory Group: European Commission, EEA scientific committee, WHO, ECMWF, IPCC, SWIPA, other organisations • External review:Advisory Group, countries, and selected experts • Data sources: International databases, European and other research projects, academic publications • Extent: 300 pages, 44 indicators, >120 maps and figures

  11. Structure of 2012 climateimpacts report • 4. Climate impacts on socio-economic systems and health • Agriculture (4) • Forests and forestry (2) • Fisheries and aquaculture • Human health (4) • Energy (1) • Transport • Tourism • 5. Vulnerability to climate change • River flooding, water scarcity and droughts • Integrated assessment of vulnerability • Cities and urban areas • Damage costs (1) • 6. Indicator and data needs Executive Summary Technical Summary • Introduction 2. Changes in the climate system • Key climate variables (5) • Cryosphere (6) 3. Climate impacts on environmental systems • Oceans and marine environment (5) • Coastal zones (2) • Freshwater quantity and quality (5) • Terrestrial ecosystems (5) • Soil (3) (x): Number of “indicators“

  12. Example: Cryosphere indicators (past trends) 12

  13. Data availability in 2012 report • Best data availability for climatic variables and ecosystems • For many other topics, the historical data series are short and the projections indicative at best • Greatest “white spots” are related toclimate impacts on socio-economic systems andhealth, bothrelatedtoattribution of pastandtrendsandtofutureprojections • Some climate-sensitive issues are not covered due to • Insufficientdataand/or regional specificity: industry and manufacturing, insurance, infrastructure, livestock production, specialistcrops, cultural heritage; • Hard-to-quantify: aesthetic impacts, personal well-being; • Speculative attribution: migration

  14. CLIM indicatorupdatessince 2012 • Motivation • Including important new information (e.g. IPCC AR5) • Extension of Core Set of Indicators (by 4 CLIM indicators) • Moving from static to dynamic graphs (online) • Preparing for 2016 EEA climate impacts report • Planning • It was not fully clear at the end of 2013 which indicators would require an update (depending on IPCC AR5) • Process • Lead by EEA • Support from ETC/CCA (for some indicators) • Further support from WHO, ECDC and other experts

  15. New CLIM indicators in the EEA Core Set of Indicators • CLIM013 - Sea surface temperature (published) • CLIM012 - Sea level rise (completed) • CLIM007/008/009/010 – Cryosphere: to be decided how to deal with individual vs. combined cryosphere indicators • CLIM039 – Damage from extreme weather events: status update by Wouter

  16. CLIM indicatorupdates after 2012 • Climate change indicators • ETC/CCA support lead by Mikael H. • Published 14 indicator updates (1 pending) • Merged 2 indicators (sea-level rise and storm surges) • Incorporated important new information (e.g. from IPCC AR5, CMIP5, EURO-CORDEX) • EEA highlight published a few weeks ago • Climate change impacts indicators • ETC/CCA support lead by Andreas M. • Published 5 indicators (ecosystems, agriculture, health) • 2indicators are still under review (by WHO and ECDC) • At least 3 further indicator updates are planned (lead by other EEA colleagues)

  17. Selected changesto CLIM indicators(since 2012)

  18. Published and expected information on European CCIVA from other organisations • February 2013: Background Report to the Impact Assessment of the EU Adaptation Strategy (lead by Environment Agency Austria). • October 2013: NMI/EASAC Report “Extreme Weather Events in Europe: preparing for climate change adaptation” • March 2014: IPCC Fifth Assessment Report, in particular the chapter on Europe in the contribution of Working Group II • April 2014: JRC Report “Climate Impacts in Europe. The JRC PESETA II project” • 2016/17: Possibly new Impact Assessment (in connection with the planned 2017 revision of the EU Adaptation Strategy) • From 2016 on?: Possibly regular reports by the Copernicus Climate Change Service Delegated Entity (ECMWF) • Other research projects: PESETA III, CLIPC, …

  19. 2016 EEA CCIV report • Key open questions - content • Length (i.e. inclusion of full indicator assessments?) • Consideration of “non-indicator-based” information (e.g. from key projects funded by RTD / CLIMA / JRC) • Coordination with 2017 revision of EU Adaptation Strategy (including background report to the Impact Assessment) • Key open questions - process • Degree of involvement of JRC • Resources available for “new” indicators (e.g. SEBI010) • Changes in process for figure and indicator production • How to ensure commitment by key EEA and ETC authors • Improved planning to avoid stress in the final phase

  20. Survey on 2016 EEA CCIV report • Goal and topics • Receive “informal” feedback from target users and experts • Use and usefulness of the 2012 report • Potential changes in the 2016 report • Recipients (ca. 200) • Commission experts (various DGs) • NRC-CCIVA & NFPs • “Country contacts” in ministries • International organisations (WHO, UNISDR, OECD, etc.) • Other European networks (ENCA IG on Adaptation, Climate Change in Health, JPI Climate MB, former CIRCLE2 MB, …) • Timing • Published on Eionet Forum (NRC-CCIV site, public part) • 3 – 24 September

  21. Production of 2016 EEA CCIV report • Overall process similar as for the 2012 report • Some changes foreseen in the Advisory Committee (e.g. inclusion of some “advanced” countries) • Work plan to be finalized late-2014;sincere work starts early 2015 • Content work stretched across time (in order to prevent peak loads and bottlenecks) • Relevant for ETC-CCA: • Clear agreements on responsibility, deliveryand timing • Strengthened role of ETC task manager: coordination of contributors, mandatory QA/QC • Who will be ETC-CCA task manager?

  22. Prioritycontentimprovement • Improved presentation of information related to droughts and floods • Possibly small expert workshop in early 2015 • Includeinformationon Antarcticicesheets • Additional information on terrestrialecosystems(e.g. migratorybirds, invasive species) • Additional information on marine ecosystems(oceanoxygencontent, deadzones, algalblooms) • Harmonizeinformation on damages due to extreme weatherevents • Considerfurtherfeedbackfromusersurvey

  23. Thankyou

  24. Contributionby JRC to 2012 EEA CCIV report

  25. Survey on the 2016 EEA CCIV Report • Have you made use of the recent EEA reports to help define the scope and content of national impact, vulnerability and risk assessments? • Are you developing and implementing indicators in your country that are based on or similar to the indicators in the EEA reports? • How should EEA balance its effort on a printed report versus efforts to maintain and update indicators on the EEA website? • Which parts of the 2012 EEA Report did you find particularly useful? • Which changes do you propose in the development process and the content of the planned 2016 EEA Report, compared to the 2012 report? • Are you interested in taking an active role in the development of the 2016 EEA Report by becoming a member of the foreseen Advisory Board? • How can EEA best identify and involve experts within your country that can review the report (beyond the NRC CC IVA)? • Sent to ca. 200 recipients : Commission experts, NRC-CCIVA, NFPs, “country contacts” in ministries, international organisations(WHO, UNISDR, OECD, etc.), ENCA IG on Adaptation, JPI Climate MB, former CIRCLE2 MB, …

  26. Requests to CCCS • Contribute to the EEA climate change impact indicators and (if feasible) 2016 indicator-based assessment report • Explore potential impactindicatorsforsectors/topicsthatareunderrepresentedin thecurrent EEA indicatorset • Considerqualitycriteriaand different policypurposesof EEA indicators • Help define best linkages between the CCCSand Climate-ADAPT (involving also DG CLIMA) • Consider EU “policy sectors” in sectoral delineation

More Related