1 / 23

Response to Flash Flood Warnings: State of our Knowledge

Response to Flash Flood Warnings: State of our Knowledge. Burrell E. Montz Department of Geography East Carolina University montzb@ecu.edu. Topics. Short fuse events Flash floods Tornadoes Overview of studies Summary of findings So what...?. The Problem.

eithne
Télécharger la présentation

Response to Flash Flood Warnings: State of our Knowledge

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Response to Flash Flood Warnings: State of our Knowledge Burrell E. Montz Department of Geography East Carolina University montzb@ecu.edu

  2. Topics • Short fuse events • Flash floods • Tornadoes • Overview of studies • Summary of findings • So what...?

  3. The Problem There remains, then, the need for a mathematicalmodel of human response to warnings, a model that wouldmimic all essential characteristics of human response in asetting of a local flood warning system and that would enableone to predict the outcomes of decision-event pairs. Krzysztofowicz, R., 1993 Reality

  4. Components of Public Response • Hear • Understand • Believe • Personalize • Decide to act • Respond

  5. What People Say Gruntfest et al., 2008

  6. What People Do League, 2008

  7. Actual versus Anticipated Behavior • Difference between what people say and what they do • Importance of context and circumstance • Difficult to document impacts of • Time • Memory • Cognitive dissonance

  8. Tornado Studies: Sources of Information Schmidlin et al., 2009; Schmidlin and King, 1997; Balluz et al., 2000

  9. Actions and Reasons:35% took shelter • Positive actions correlated with • Perceived danger • Presence of children • High school education • Hearing warning • Having a basement • Being married • Negative actions correlated with • Previous damage • Less education • God’s will • Lack of access to shelter • Limited mobility • No correlation • Age, gender, race • Lead time • Owning NWR • Family size • Previous experience

  10. NWS Service Assessments • Super Tuesday 2008 Tornadoes • 57 dead • 18 (32%) heard some warnings • 11 (61%) heeded warnings • 8 (44%) sought shelter • 6 (33%) did not • Mothers’ Day 2008 Tornadoes • 21 dead • 11 (52%) knew of warning • 10 (47.6%) tried to take shelter ________________________ • 14 groups interviewed • 6 (42.8%) heard official warning • 6 heard from family or friends • 4 (28.5%) sought shelter • 6 tried but it “came too fast”

  11. Flood Fatalities Source: League, 2009, http://www.geo.txstate.edu/lovell/IFFL/research.html

  12. Vehicle Deaths Source: League, 2009, http://www.geo.txstate.edu/lovell/IFFL/research.html

  13. Gender Breakdown* * Where reported Source: League, 2009, http://www.geo.txstate.edu/lovell/IFFL/research.html

  14. So what about warnings?

  15. But... • There is a difference between • Intentional Drivers • Situational Drivers League, 2009

  16. False Alarms, Near Misses, and Response • What we know • Very different definitions of false alarms • NWS vs public • Perceptions of accuracy vary • NWS vs public • Cry wolf or warning fatigue or neither • Influence of event type • We don’t know enough Barnes et al., 2007

  17. And... • There is no ONE public • Different languages • Different understandings • Different situations • Different capabilities • Different needs

  18. Long way to go...

  19. Conclusion • NWS mission: Protect life and property • NWS warnings are only the beginning of meeting this mission • Warnings move through various paths to the public • Warnings are received and understood differently • Collaborative effort required to get positive, protective responses • Social science research required to understand why people respond the way they do under what circumstances

  20. Thank youAny questions you’d like to wade through? http://blogs.davenportlibrary.com/sc/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/no-wading.jpg

More Related