1 / 19

A Master Thesis Project at ICT/KTH

A Master Thesis Project at ICT/KTH. Some practical guidelines by Vlad Vlassov and Thomas Sjöland IMIT/ICT/KTH. Choosing a project to perform. In which area (topic)? 2G1004 Software technology; 2G1001 Computer Systems; 2G1021 Telecommunication Systems, etc.

ejeffery
Télécharger la présentation

A Master Thesis Project at ICT/KTH

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. A Master Thesis Projectat ICT/KTH Some practical guidelines by Vlad Vlassov and Thomas Sjöland IMIT/ICT/KTH

  2. Choosing a project to perform • In which area (topic)? • 2G1004 Software technology; 2G1001 Computer Systems; 2G1021 Telecommunication Systems, etc. • Should correspond to your specialization. • See: http://www.imit.kth.se/courses/html/exjobb/Exjobbpage.html • Where? • At a company • The project work is usually paid • At a department • A project work is not paid, as it’s considered as a ordinary course • Examiner and supervisors: • An examiner. Check a list of examiners assigned to topics • See a list of IMIT examiners at: http://www.imit.kth.se/courses/html/exjobb/examiners.exjobb.html • An academic supervisor (can be also an examiner) • An industrial supervisor

  3. Types of projects • Development • Expected results: a prototype, results of evaluation (comparison) • Research-oriented • Expected results: surveys, design choices and issues, design (use cases, architecture, protocols), a basic prototype, evaluation procedure, evaluation • Evaluation • Expected results: models, evaluation/simulation procedure, a simulation environment or/and an evaluation test-bed, simulation/evaluation results • In either case, a project includes literature study • Relevant technologies; related work (if any)

  4. 4. Description of use cases system architecture, protocols, etc. 1. Specification (in 2 weeks) 2. Detailed working plan TOC (Table of Contents) 5. A system prototype 6. Evaluation results 3. Lit. study report 7. Thesis draft P 0 1 2 3 4 5 5-6 month ~20 weeks Reading, studying Design, development Implementation and evaluation Writing and revising the report, Prepare presentation A typical time plan and deliverables

  5. 1. A project specification • Should clearly define the amount of work and expected results • Important to agree on the specification in the beginning • Can be written by • an industrial advisor (together with a student) • an academic advisor (together with a student) • a student • Should include: • Background information • Motivation for the project (whether it is worth a master degree) • Problem statement. Requirements • Expected results • How results must be evaluated

  6. 2. TOC (Table Of Contents) • To be delivered by the end of the 1st month • TOC is a Detailed working plan • Shows a structure of the thesis • A short abstract for each chapter • What is it about • Expected results • Should include timing • TOC will be revised while the project progresses

  7. 3. Literature study • Expected that • you will apply a knowledge you got earlier • you will get a new knowledge needed to perform the project, to make and to motivate design and development decisions and solutions • You show your ability to search, select and study relevant literature (papers, books, tutorials, manuals, etc.) and related work • A literature study report should be delivered by the end of the 2nd month

  8. A literature study report • It’s an introductory part of your thesis • Should include: • Background • Motivation • A detailed problem statement. Requirements • Expected results • How to evaluate • Related work (survey and discussion) • Existing solutions (systems, etc.) • Survey of relevant technologies, environments, tools, etc. • You should choose technologies, environments, etc., to be used in the project, and motivate your choices • Some conclusions

  9. Information sources: papers • In proceedings • Workshops • Usually include papers describing work in progress, ideas (which might be not yet properly validated and evaluated) • Conferences • Usually include papers describing rather completed work with strong evaluation • Symposiums • Usually Include papers describing some completed work (project) with strong evaluation • Different scale: international, local • Sponsored by IEEE and/or ACM • You should find major workshops, conferences, symposiums which are most relevant to your topic. Ask you advisors to help. • In journals • IEEE, ACM, Elsevier-published journals; Transactions • Journals specialized on specific topics; special issues; surveys

  10. E-Libraries • KTH Library Full text e-journals, conference proceedings, etc: http://www.lib.kth.se/kthbeng/full.html • IEEE digital library (a.k.a. IEEE Xplore) http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/DynWel.jsp • Find the link at www.ieee.org • The ACM digital library http://portal.acm.org/dl.cfm • Find a link at www.acm-.org • You get free access, if you access from a computer with an IP address in the KTH domain

  11. Other sources • Books • Specifications • User manuals • Tutorials • Technical reports • Theses • Courses • Much information is available on the Web • Web pages

  12. What to read?What can be skimmed or skipped? • Should be critical to what you are reading and selective in what you are reading • Who are authors? Affiliation? • Industry (.com): can be just an advertisement. However, most of information is trusty when it’s related to research and development • Which company? IBM, Intel, Sun, Microsoft, … • Academia (.edu): can be a “raw” idea not properly evaluated • Which university? North America (MIT, Stanford, Berkeley, CMU, Caltech,…), Europe, Asia, Australia, Central or South America • Which research group? (well established, well known in this area, etc.) • Which project? (scale, competed or in progress, etc.) • Consortium (.org), e.g. OMG, Globus • Where it has been reported? • Level of a forum (conference, workshop, symposium) • Level of a journal

  13. Typical structure of a thesis • Abstract • Introduction • Background • Method • Presents use cases and a system design (architecture, protocols, diagrams, etc.) • Implementation • Describes implementation • Analysis • Validation, Evaluation • Conclusions and future work • References • Appendixes (if any)

  14. How to describe • Design and development: • May follow RUP (Rational Unified Process) • Vision, use cases, UML diagrams, etc. • Should describe • a structure of the system; • how it operates; • typical usage. • Implementation • Describe only most essential and important classes, interfaces, modules, etc. • Should give an estimate of the amount of code you have developed • If required, docs, sources and user manuals (if any) can be placed in appendixes • Indicate problems (if any) that you have faced when implementing a system prototype

  15. Evaluation of results • Validation • Functionality tests should show that a system prototype works as expected • Use cases can help • Evaluation • Evaluation procedure: evaluation flow, input and output parameters • How good is your application • Define a notion of quality, e.g. performance, scalability, reliability, etc. • What is performance in your case: throughput, response time, or execution time, etc.? • Requirements should help to define a quality measure • How and what to measure. Ranges of input parameters. Sensitivity analysis. • Evaluation environment: a test-bed, benchmarks, test applications

  16. Conclusions • Summary • What have you done, achieved, solved • Conclusions • Future work

  17. Final stages • A first thesis draft should be delivered to supervisors 1-1,5 month before the presentation • May require several revisions • A final draft should be given to an opponent 2-3 weeks before the presentation • The time depends on the opponent: how fast he/she can read your report and write an opposition protocol • Opponent: • Should come up with an opposition protocol to be sent to the examiner a few days before the presentation • The examiner can make a decision whether to proceed to the presentation, or to postpone the presentation until the thesis is revised (if needed)

  18. Presentation • 20-45 minutes (20-30 slides) • May have more slides (hide some slides) to answer questions • Put all figures (and tables) on slides to avoid drawing • Discussion with an opponent • Questions

  19. More advices • A text editor • Select an editor (e.g. MS Word) that provides an automatic update of cross-references, spelling and grammar checker, changes tracker, convenient drawing tool, comments, etc. • Literature study • Keep a list of references • Take notes when reading • A project web site • Helps to keep a list related links and show how the project is progressing • Take and keep notes of project meeting • Diary • Protect some sensitive data with a password

More Related