1 / 23

Institute of Technology of Cambodia

PACE University. Institute of Technology of Cambodia. University of DELHI. TEAM TEACUP 2006. CAMBODIAN RESTAURANT PROJECT. RESPONSIBLE BY. Prof. Christelle Scharff. Prof. Sopheap Seng. Prof. Chanthearith HUON. EXTENDED US TEAM. LOCAL TEAM. EXTENDED INDIAN TEAM.

elani
Télécharger la présentation

Institute of Technology of Cambodia

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. PACE University Institute of Technology of Cambodia University of DELHI TEAM TEACUP 2006 CAMBODIAN RESTAURANT PROJECT RESPONSIBLE BY Prof. ChristelleScharff Prof. Sopheap Seng Prof. Chanthearith HUON EXTENDED US TEAM LOCAL TEAM EXTENDED INDIAN TEAM Sam Ath Ouch -Team Leader Ly Chea -Quality Kimheng Sok -Communication Samvannak Samon -Documentation Sovanndara Chheng -Localization Jonathan Lee - Team Leader Kelum Wick - Quality Nick Rudzwick - Communication Ricardo Viera - Documentation Anushree Dixit -Database Design Vikrant Arora -Database Design ACADEMIC YEAR: 2005 ~ 2006

  2. OUTLINE • INTRODUCTION • Project Description • Extended team and the software system • Functional and Non-functional requirements • CLIENT ROLES • Project Milestones • Process of the project • Software show • Compare US and Indian Students software • Top 10 things to keep client happy • Top 10 things make client unhappy • Top 10 things making a good client • EXPERIENCE IN TEAMWORK • Interaction with PACE students • Difficulty • GLOBAL SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT • Our project & Real life • Comment for the developer • Personal experience • 5. CONCLUSION • Evaluation of both software

  3. 1. INTRODUCTION | Project Description | Extended team and the software system | Functional & Non-Functional Requirements | Project Description CAMBODIAN RESTAURANT PROJECT • Objective: • We would like to have a web-based application that could help us • to sell the food online in Phnom Penh with the delivery service. • The users of the software are: • Administrator of the restaurant • Managers of the restaurant • Receptionists of the restaurant • Clients of the restaurant • Internet Users ( Lambda Users ) • Duration: • Start from : Jan 24, 2006 • Until : May, 2006 Page 1/20 June, 2006

  4. 1. INTRODUCTION | Project Description | Extended team and the software system | Functional & Non-Functional Requirements | Extended team and the software system NickRudzwick Communication Leader Ricardo Viera Documentation Leader Kelum Wick Quality Leader Jonathan Lee Team Leader • The CASE-Tools US team used for this project were: • Microsoft Word and PowerPoint for the Documents and Presentation. • The Java Programming Language (Servlets) • Eclipse and JCreator. • Dreamweaver 8 and HTML and WordPad for the website. • MYSQL was used in the construction of the databases. Page 2/20 June, 2006

  5. 1. INTRODUCTION | Project Description| Extended team and the software system |Functional & Non-Functional Requirements | Functional & Non-Functional Requirements Functional Requirements • Register (Lambda User) • Place Order (Client) • Check Order Status (Client) • Cancel Order (Client) • Leave and View Feedback (Client, Manager/Admin) • View List of Pending and Completed Orders (Receptionist, Manager) • View Financial and Customer Information (Manager) • Create and delete accounts (Client, Admin) • View Menu (Client, Receptionist/Manager/Admin) • Log in and Log out (Client/Receptionist/Manager/Admin) • Request and View Menu Change (Manager, Admin) • Update Menu (Admin) • Change Profile (Client/Receptionist/Manager/Admin) • View all account information (Admin) • Website Security (High Priority) • Language Preference (Medium Priority) • Website Layout/Easy to Use Interface (High Priority) • Alert Messages (Medium Priority) Non-Functional Requirements Page 3/20 June, 2006

  6. 2. CLIENT ROLES | Project Milestones | Process of the Project | Software show | Compare US and Indian students software | Project Milestones • Team bonding and initialization of communications (1 week) • Requirements (4 weeks) • Design (4 weeks) • Mid-semester presentations • Implementation (2-3 weeks) • Testing (1-2 weeks) • Presentations (Last week of class) Page 4/20 June, 2006

  7. 2. CLIENT ROLES | Project Milestones | Process of the Project | Software show| Compare US and Indian students software | Requirements Phase • Objective: • Stakeholder • Functional & Non-Functional Requirements • Communication: • Confirm about some problems that need to be avoid • Answering Questionnaire which was sent by US students • Answering mail and discuss in the conference • Make sure that the developer understand what is needed • Help developer to find out the solution of how the software works • by giving comments • Annex: • URL of the other online restaurants • Pictures of the foods, map and logo of the restaurant • Menu in PDF format • Post the blog and do the survey • Validate the requirements document Page 5/20 June, 2006

  8. 2. CLIENT ROLES | Project Milestones | Process of the Project | Software show | Compare US and Indian students software | Design Phase • Communication: • Answering mail and discuss in the conference • Keep discussing about the points that were not clear • Modification: • Add some new features to make the software more accurate • Remove some features which were not important • Try to encourage the extended team to share the work that • they have done, even though it wasn’t completed yet, in order • to make the project go smoothly and correctly • Annex: • Index page (How it looks like) • Contact page • Post the blog and do the survey • View the design and GUI documents • Validate the design document Page 6/20 June, 2006

  9. 2. CLIENT ROLES | Project Milestones | Process of the Project | Software show | Compare US and Indian students software | Testing Phase http://rest.tomchuk.com/wiki/CompletedWork/ • Testing: • Test the software of Cambodian Restaurant • Post the bug to share about the points that were not • well done enough • Giving the comment about the interface and the quality • of the software, how the software should improve • Accept or Reject the software by giving the good points and bad points • Validation: • US students software • Indian students software • Compare both software Page 7/20 June, 2006

  10. 2. CLIENT ROLES | Project Milestones| Process of the Project |Software show | Compare US and Indian students software | Software developed by US Students http://matrix.csis.pace.edu/~s06-cs389-s11/ • STRONG POINTS • The interface is acceptable • Most of the features were done well • Good security protection • Good navigator and links • All the page title are clearly shown • Respect the deadline • WEAK POINTS • Type exception were not done well • The error message was not fulfill • Something which were told in the • conference were lack • RESULT • WE ACCEPT THIS SOFTWARE. Page 8/20 June, 2006

  11. 2. CLIENT ROLES | Project Milestones| Process of the Project |Software show | Compare US and Indian students software | Software developed by Indian Students http://csdb.du.ac.in:8090/restaurant_india/ • STRONG POINTS • The interface is acceptable • Good at database design • Even 2 members in the team, but • could provide the software • WEAK POINTS • Type exception were not done well • The error message was not fulfill • Most of the features were not done • well • Security fail • The web page isn’t well organized • Didn’t satisfy the our desire • RESULT • WE REJECT THIS SOFTWARE. Page 9/20 June, 2006

  12. 2. CLIENT ROLES | Project Milestones| Process of the Project | Software show |Compare US and Indian students software | Comparison of both software • Among both software which were done by US and Indian students: • We prefer the software of US students, because the software that had been developed respected what we need. Most of the features and most of the things that we were working together through answering mail and discussing were included • We don’t accept the software of Indian students, it doesn’t mean that they didn’t respect our desire. In fact, we didn’t contact with Indian students, even mail or face to face. We can’t say that they did bad job or anything. The point is that, the security of the software were not done well and there were also many error on some features. • NOTE: Thanks to Indian students anyway for their hard work Page 10/20 June, 2006

  13. 2. CLIENT ROLES | Top 10 things to keep client happy |Top 10 things make client unhappy | Top 10 things make a good client | Top 10 things to keep client happy • Client’s comments were taken in action • Provide more service available • Show the capacity of hard working and serious about the project • Good interaction between developer and client • Provide the document necessary of the work that have done • Before changing anything about the software, let’s client knows first • Find out the good solution to replace the thing that had been changed • Respect the deadline of the project • Result of the software should adapt with client desire • The price of creating the software is suitable Page 11/20 June, 2006

  14. 2. CLIENT ROLES | Top 10 things to keep client happy |Top 10 things make client unhappy | Top 10 things make a good client | Top 10 things make client unhappy • Changing the features of the software without any reasons • Not good relationship between clients and developers • Incapable of doing the project • Quality of the software( Many errors, web page isn’t interesting) • Lost contact during the project • Misunderstanding the desire of client • Not taking serious about develop the project • Not respect the deadline of the project • Result of the software not adapt with client desire • Make client feel that they lost the time and resource Page 12/20 June, 2006

  15. 2. CLIENT ROLES | Top 10 things to keep client happy |Top 10 things make client unhappy | Top 10 things make a good client | Top 10 things make a good client • Good at explaining about the problem and the need • Know something about how the project work • Providing the resource available • Answering the developer’s question as quickly as possible • Be patient on waiting for the software • Encouraging the developer to work hard • Make the developer feel happy when they do good things • Giving the comment when they do something not adapt with our desire • Be prepare enough time for the developer, so that the developer could • have enough time to correct the bug or to create a new one with some • conditions (ex. Reduce the price of the software) • If the client could know something about the informatics Page 13/20 June, 2006

  16. 3. EXPERIENCE IN TEAMWORK | Interaction with PACE Students |Difficulty| Reports Number of Mails: Feb =17, Mar = 40, Apr = 24, May = 20 Online Meeting: 6 times (Jan 26, Feb 04, Feb 25, Mar 23, Apr 01, Apr 27) Website using : http://www.itc.edu.kh/ http://www.csis.pace.edu/~scharff/cs3892006 (Prof scharff webpage) http://teamteacup2006.i8.com/ (webpage for teamteacup) http://blogger.com (website to create the blog) http://restaurantproject2006.blogspot.com/ (Post the blog) http://www.zoomerang.com/survey.zgi?p=U24E9SC4D4D6 (survey) http://www.zoomerang.com/survey.zgi?p=WEB22527X7G588 (survey) http://www.questionpro.com/akira/TakeSurvey?id=402682&rd=4765075 (survey) http://www.csis.pace.edu/~scharff/cs3892006/PASSWORD/FEEDBACK/restaurantdesign.zip (login: alllogin /password: gsd123/ Feedback) http://www.youtube.com/watch.php?v=jQaHrcwKsoc (video of Thomas Friedman entitled "The other side of outsourcing") http://www.yousendit.com/ (This service permits us to share files (up to 1GB) http://matrix.csis.pace.edu/~s06-cs389-s11/ (online restaurant website) http://rest.tomchuk.com/wiki/CompletedWork (Bug reports) http://csdb.du.ac.in:8090/restaurant_india/ (Website Indian) Page 14/20 June, 2006

  17. 3. EXPERIENCE IN TEAMWORK | Interaction with PACE Students |Difficulty| Difficulty • The different of geometric time (12hours different) • We don’t have the internet service at home • Few time after school going to the internet café to response the mail • Unaware about the process of the project, What is our responsibility • in each phase • Difficult to explain in distance and solve the problem in a short time • Take many days to check, discuss and response mail Page 15/20 June, 2006

  18. 4. GLOBAL SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT | Our Project & Real life | Comment for the developer | Personal experience | The Quality of our software • Good security is the main point of our software • Most of the features that is needed respect the desire • Medium interface human and machine • Even though we have completed our project successfully with • the acceptable result, but it doesn’t mean that we could use this • software in public • In reality, our software isn’t completely done yet • The modification of the software is needed Page 16/20 June, 2006

  19. 4. GLOBAL SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT | Our Project & Real life | Comment for the developer | Personal experience | How to improve our software ? • Though our experience in this project we have notice some main • points to improve our software : • The requirement phase is the most important in the project • (Client desire should clarify here, not at the design phase) • In the beginning of the design phase should think about the • problem that was not complete in the requirement phase • Good communication skill between client and developer is needed • Division of the duty for each member is also an important thing • Abilities to solve the problems when we face in coding phase • Try to find out the bug as much as possible and correct them immediately • Work more harder to finish the project on time with the result coming Page 17/20 June, 2006

  20. 4. GLOBAL SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT | Our Project & Real life |Comment for the developer | Personal experience | Experiences of local team • Team Leader • related to team work • leadership skill • Quality Leader • validate the document • relationship in the team • Communication Leader • communication skill • responsible for information distribution • Documentation Leader • keep all the documents of the project • be sure that all members in the group have the document needed • Localization Leader • join team activities • test the software Page 18/20 June, 2006

  21. 5. CONCLUSION | Evaluation of both software |Gratitude | Acceptation or Reject the software • As a result of the final phase in our project • We accept the software that was done by US team • We reject the software that was done by Indian team Page 19/20 June, 2006

  22. 5. CONCLUSION | Evaluation of both software |Gratitude | Gratitude • Professor Sopheap and Professor Scharff • Professor Thearith, Professor Longchrea and others Professors • Extended team US students and Indian students • Local team Cambodian students Good luck for every body !!! THANKS YOU Page 20/20 June, 2006

  23. QUESTIONS & ANSWERS ?

More Related