1 / 72

Turkiye’de Akademik Yükselmeler, Akademik Araştırma Performans Ölçümü ve SCOPUS

Turkiye’de Akademik Yükselmeler, Akademik Araştırma Performans Ölçümü ve SCOPUS. TAYFUN BASAL ELSEVIER TURKIYE & ORTA ASYA SATIS MUDURU t.basal@elsevier.com. Turkish Academic Research - Figures. AN OVERVIEW OF THE DOCUMENTS FOR 2006 TOP 5 FIELDS. MEDICINE : % 30.55

elata
Télécharger la présentation

Turkiye’de Akademik Yükselmeler, Akademik Araştırma Performans Ölçümü ve SCOPUS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Turkiye’de Akademik Yükselmeler, Akademik Araştırma Performans Ölçümü ve SCOPUS TAYFUN BASAL ELSEVIER TURKIYE & ORTA ASYA SATIS MUDURU t.basal@elsevier.com

  2. Turkish Academic Research - Figures

  3. AN OVERVIEW OF THE DOCUMENTS FOR 2006TOP 5 FIELDS • MEDICINE : % 30.55 • BIOCHEMISTRY, GENETICS & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY : %7.9 • AGRICULTURAL & BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES : % 6.88 • ENGINEERING: % 6.71 • PHYSICS & ASTRONOMY : % 5.46

  4. COUNTRY INDICATORS

  5. WHERE DO WE STAND ON AN INTERNATIONAL BASIS ?

  6. Turkey’s position in the regional and international scope

  7. 2006 THES RANKING # of universities in the Times top 200 2005 Time’s list

  8. 70 54 60 50 40 29 30 20 6 10 11 3 0 India Japan China UK US # of universities in the Times top 200 NO TURKISH UNIVERSITIES IN TOP 200 YET..

  9. DOCUMENTS PRODUCED PER COUNTRY IN 2007 Turkey is powerful in middleeast & gulf but not at high rank. globally

  10. Comparison • Turkey                                            Iran                                                      Greece                • 2002 : 5,695                                     2002 : 528                                             2002 : 2,376 • 2003 : 7,035                                     2003 : 769                                             2003 : 2,709 • 2004 : 7,930                                     2004 : 951                                             2004 : 3,320 • 2005 : 9,115                                     2005 : 1690                                           2005 : 3,815 • 2006 : 9,189                                     2006 : 2420                                           2006 : 4,310 • 38,964                                                 6358                                                   16,530 • Total articles published (2002-2006)  • * • H-INDEX (2002-2006)                          • 57                                                       29                                                        80 • * • H-INDEX (1996-PRESENT)                 • 84                                                       38                                                      121

  11. Macro-economics Population (X Mio) # of researchers (X Thousand) (%) of total population Growth rate 0.3% 0.1% 1.0% 0.7% 1.7% 0.27% 0.25% 0.05% 0.12% 0.06% GDP (PPP) (X Bln $) R&D Spend (X Mio $) Growth rate (%) of GDP 2.8% 3.9% 6.1% 4.3% 6.8% 1.7% 1.1% 0.7% 0.6% 0.2% Economic and Population growth in Turkey are higher than in the UK, however R&D Spend and # of researchers are clearly lagging

  12. Macro-economics The per capita R&D spend is significantly below the UK figures 2006 – GDP/Capita 2006 – R&D-spend/Capita 7.6X 3.7 X 3.5 X 1.2 X 62.2 X 11.6 X 9.7 X 1.9 X $ $ ? Low and Medium developed countries can significantly increase their performance in R&D by increasing their investment per Capita to the UK-GDP/Capita ratio Source: CIA world book of facts 2007, UNESCO, All values are against GDP(PPP)

  13. comparing countries research performance To win the marathon a good position at the start is crucial Iran Turkey Egypt Spain UK US

  14. comparing countries research performance International rankings still show a huge lead for UK and US universities 2005 2007 Egypt Iran Turkey Spain UK US

  15. comparing countries research performance Turkey has only 1.2 % of articles indexed on Scopus but is showing promising growth, while UK and US shares decline Average share of articles published worldwide # articles published The UK and US contribute 32.3% of world articles but representing only 5.5% of the world population

  16. Thailand Iran Egypt Turkey Science Development USA: 288,000 papers Ave Rel. Imp: 1.47

  17. Thailand Pakistan Iran Egypt Tunisia Saudi Arabia Morocco Development of Science – A closer look

  18. TRENDS IN ACADEMIC RESEARCH • THES “TIMES HIGHER EDUCATION SUPPLEMENT”

  19. New Scopus release & improved support for measuring academic research performance: 26 April 2008 Find information effectively Make better-informed decisions

  20. Agenda • Upcoming release • Update on Scopus content • Scopus cited-by integration • Benchmarking study • Custom Data

  21. Spring Release: At a glance • Affiliation Identifier – world’s first online tool to automatically identify and group an organization with all its research output • Journal Evaluator – comparative overview of journal performance by discipline • Author Citations Alerts – monitoring an author’s citations • Maintain Alerts – ongoing notification of results and citations for former-users • Shibboleth access – same login for Scopus and other resources, both inside and outside customer institutions.

  22. Affiliation Identifier

  23. Challenges: Academics & Governments • Institutions: under pressure to analyze and quantify research achievements of own institute and others • Senior managers: take resource allocation decisions • Middle managers: analyze research trends • Students: decide where they want to study/do research • Funding bodies, governments, beneficiaries: quantitatively evaluate institutions by counting the number of research papers produced over time

  24. In other words … it’s all about resources … • Time • to pursue research • to analyze research output • Money • to fund research • to attract/keep right research But … spelling variants of institutes make it difficult to spend these resources in a useful way

  25. Scopus offers the solution: Affiliation Identifier • The world’s first online tool to automatically identify and group an organization with all its research output • Launched • ++ integration into the Scopus interface and operating across the entire database of 15,000 peer-reviewed journals (Spring release, 26 Apr 2008) • View an organization’s summary page • Provide feedback when logged in (e.g. merge profiles)

  26. Affiliation Identifier: What does it do? • Matches institutional name variants into profiles • via a combination of sophisticated algorithms • against comprehensive knowledge base of standardised affiliation names of 4.4mln profiles • 2mln main institute profiles • 2.4mln department profiles (e.g. univ hospital) • Provides the vital first step towards reviewing an organisation’s research output, hence leaves more time for the actual research Identifying an institution’s output could easily take a couple of days. With Scopus this will take at most a few minutes.

  27. Affiliation Identifier: Something for everyone • Deans, chancellors, provosts: can spend less time and money measuring research performance and channel it into other areas • Heads of departments: can spend less time aggregating and more time on benchmarking analysis. Make good decisions faster • Managers, project leaders: spot trends, collaborators and competitors faster and more precisely.

  28. Affiliation Identifier: What does it look like?

  29. Affiliation Identifier:What does it look like ?

  30. Affiliation Identifier: What does it look like

  31. More time to do the actual benchmarking analysis and make faster, better-informed resource allocation decisions

  32. Journal Evaluation Tool

  33. Journal Evaluation Tool: The Challenges • For publishing editors, authors, reviewers, researchers • editors try to establish a superior reputation for their journals • authors, reviewers and researchers will be attracted by the most highly valued and prestigious journals in their subject field • For librarians • librarians need to make well informed budget decisions (portfolio management) • Librarians need to prove that they can provide returns on their investments

  34. Journal Evaluation Tool: What does Scopus offer • Gives users a comparative overview of the journal landscape, showing how titles in a given field are performing relative to each other • Quantitative data is presented in an easy, comprehensive graphical format comparing citations of max. 10 journals from over 15,000 peer reviewed journals from today all the way back to 1996 • Data is updated bi-monthly to ensure currency Scopus Evaluation Tool: a tool to make better informed decisions.

  35. Journal Evaluation Tool: Benefits to user groups • Editors/publishing teams: helps them to monitor progress against competitors, or decide which titles to become involved with (as board member) • Researchers/Medical Communication Agencies: helps them to decide where to publish, how to prioritize their submissions, or which titles they should review for • Librarians: helpslibrarians invest their budgets in the most important and relevant journals for their portfolio, using the data to develop a long-term acquisitions strategy (incl ISSN, publisher info)

  36. Journal Evaluation Tool: What does it look like?

  37. Journal Evaluation Tool: What does it look like?

  38. Journal Evaluation Tool: What does it look like?

  39. Journal Evaluation Tool: What does it look like?

  40. Author Citation Alerts

  41. Author Citation Alerts: Background • Imagine an author has 500 publications and you would like to know when any of them get cited … • Currently this means 500 document citations alerts • Now with setting up 1 author citation alert it is done for all the publications of an author

  42. Author Citation Alerts: Benefits • Author Citation Alert saves valuable time, because users only need to create a search once (instead of e.g. 500) • Ensure to not miss any instance of an author being cited • E-mail notification can be setup on a daily, weekly or monthly basis • E-mail contains links to the Abstracts+Refs pages of the new documents citing the author(s) • Alerts can be managed through the ‘My Alerts’ feature.

  43. Author Citation Alerts: How does it work?

  44. Author Citation Alerts: How does it work?

  45. Author Citation Alerts: How does it work?

  46. Author Citation Alerts: additional info • Alerts are already available for searches and document citations • Another new feature as of this release: Users can now set Search Alerts from the Author Details Page

  47. Maintain Alerts

  48. Maintain Alerts: Benefits • Former Scopus users will continue to receive e-mail notification of search results or citations if they still have personal alerts set up • The notification e-mail will contain a link to “My Alerts” where the user can either maintain, deactivate or permanently delete their alerts • Links to Scopus will not work without a valid subscription to Scopus • Users regaining Scopus access via trial or subscription will be able to access personal alerts previously set-up with their old username and password • “No such thing as a Scopus ex-user” [unles the alert will be deactivated]

More Related