1 / 16

Quantum Mechanics in a Nutshell

Quantum Mechanics in a Nutshell. Quantum theory. Wave-particle duality of light ( “ wave ” ) and electrons ( “ particle ” ) Many quantities are “ quantized ” (e.g., energy, momentum, conductivity, magnetic moment, etc.)

eldora
Télécharger la présentation

Quantum Mechanics in a Nutshell

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Quantum Mechanics in a Nutshell

  2. Quantum theory • Wave-particle duality of light (“wave”) and electrons (“particle”) • Many quantities are “quantized” (e.g., energy, momentum, conductivity, magnetic moment, etc.) • For “matter waves”: Using only three pieces of information (electronic charge, electronic mass, Planck’s constant), the properties of atoms, molecules and solids can be accurately determined (in principle)!

  3. Quantum theory – Light as particles from density of states • Max Planck (~1900): energy of electromagnetic (EM) waves can take on only discrete values: E = nħω • Why? To fix the “ultraviolet catastrophe” • Classically, EM energy density, ε(ω) ~ ω2εavg = ω2(kT) • But experimental results could be recovered only if energy of a mode is an integer multiple of ħω as from equipartition theorem Classical (~ω2kT) ε(ω) The ultraviolet catastrophe experimental ω

  4. Quantum theory – Light as particles • Einstein (1905): photoelectric effect • No matter how intense light is, if ω < ωc no photoelectrons • No matter how low the intensity is, if ω > ωc, photoelectrons result • Light must come in packets (E = nħω) • Compton scattering (1923): establishes that photons have momentum! • Scattering of x-rays of a single frequency by electrons in a graphite target resulted in scattered x-rays • This made sense only if the energy and the momentum were conserved, with the momentum given by p = h/λ = ħk (k = 2π/λ, with λ being the wavelength) • By now, it is accepted that waves may display particle features …

  5. Quantum theory – Electrons as waves • Rutherford (~1911): Experiments indicate that atoms are composed of positively charged nuclei surrounded by a cloud of “orbiting” electrons. But, • Orbiting (or accelerating) charge radiates energy  electrons should spiral into nucleus  all of matter should be unstable! • Spectroscopy results of H (Rydberg states) indicated that energy of an electron in H could only be -13.6/n2 eV (n = 1,2,3,…)

  6. Quantum theory – Electrons as waves • Bohr (~1913): • Postulates “stationary states” or “orbits”, allowed only if electron’s angular momentum L is quantized by ħ, i.e., L = nħ implies that E = -13.6/n2 eV • Proof: • centripetal force on electron with mass m and charge e, orbiting with velocity v at radius r is balanced by electrostatic attraction between electron and nucleus  mv2/r = e2/(4pe0r2)  v = sqrt(e2/(4pe0mr)) • Total energy at any radius, E = 0.5mv2 - e2/(4πε0r) = -e2/(8πε0r) • L = nħ mvr = nħ  sqrt(e2mr/(4πε0)) = nħ  allowed orbit radius, r = 4πε0n2ħ2/(e2m) = a0n2 (this defines the Bohr radius a0 = 0.529 Å) • Finally, E = -e2/(8πε0r) = -(e4m/(8ε02h2)).(1/n2) = -13.6/n2 eV • The only non-classical concept introduced (without justification): L = nħ

  7. Quantum theory – Electrons as waves • de Broglie (~1923): Justification: L = nħ is equivalent to nλ = 2πr (i.e., circumference is integer multiple of wavelength) ifλ = h/p (i.e., if we can “assign” a wavelength to a particle as per the Compton analysis for waves)! • Proof: nλ = 2πr  n(h/(mv)) = 2πr  n(h/2π) = mvr  nħ = L • It all fits, if we assume that electrons are waves!

  8. Quantum theory – Electrons as wavesThe Schrodinger equation: the jewel of the crown • Schrodinger (~1925-1926): writes down “wave equation” for any single particle that obeys the new quantum rules (not just an electron) • A “proof”, while remembering: E = ħω & p = h/λ = ħk • For a free electron “wave” with a wave function Ψ(x,t) = ei(kx-ωt), energy is purely kinetic • Thus, E = p2/(2m)  ħω = ħ2k2/(2m) • A wave equation that will give this result for the choice of ei(kx-ωt) as the wave function is • Schrodinger then “generalizes” his equation for a bound particle K.E. P.E. Hamiltonian operator

  9. The Schrodinger equation • In 3-d, the time-dependent Schrodinger equation is • Writing Ψ(x,y,z,t) = ψ(x,y,z)w(t), we get the time-independent Schrodinger equation • Note that E is the total energy that we seek, and Ψ(x,y,z,t) = ψ(x,y,z)e-iEt/ħ Hamiltonian, H

  10. The Schrodinger equation • An eigenvalue problem • Has infinite number of solutions, with the solutions being Ei and ψi • The solution corresponding to the lowest Ei is the ground state • Ei is a scalar while ψi is a vector • The ψis are orthonormal, i.e., Int{ψi(r)ψj(r)d3r} = δij • If H is hermitian, Ei are all real (although ψi are complex) • Can be cast as a differential equation (Schrodinger) or a matrix equation (Heisenberg) • |ψ|2 is interpreted as a probability density, or charge density

  11. Applications of 1-particle Schrodinger equation • Initial applications • Hydrogen atom, Harmonic oscillator, Particle in a box • The hydrogen atom problem Solutions: Enlm = -13.6/n2 eV; ψnlm(r,θ,ϕ) = Rn(r)Ylm(θ,ϕ) http://www.falstad.com/qmatom/ http://panda.unm.edu/Courses/Finley/P262/Hydrogen/WaveFcns.html

  12. Summary of quantization • Spin (Pauli exclusion principle) not included in the Schrodinger equation & needs to be put in by hand (but fixed by the Dirac equation)

  13. The many-particle Schrodinger equation • The N-electron, M-nuclei Schrodinger (eigenvalue) equation: The N-electron, M-nuclei wave function The total energy that we seek The N-electron, M-nuclei Hamiltonian Nuclear kinetic energy Electronic kinetic energy Nuclear-nuclear repulsion Electron-electron repulsion Electron-nuclear attraction • The problem is completely parameter-free, but formidable! • Cannot be solved analytically when N > 1 • Too many variables – for a 100 atom Pt cluster, the wave function is a function of 23,000 variables!!!

  14. The Born-Oppenheimer approximation • Electronic mass (m) is ~1/1800 times that of a nucleon mass (MI) • Hence, nuclear degrees of freedom may be factored out • For a fixed configuration of nuclei, nuclear kinetic energy is zero and nuclear-nuclear repulsion is a constant; thus Electronic eigenvalue problem is still difficult to solve! Can this be done numerically though? That is, what if we chose a known functional form for ψ in terms of a set of adjustable parameters, and figure out a way of determining these parameters? In comes the variational theorem

  15. The variational theorem • Casts the electronic eigenvalue problem into a minimization problem • Lets introduce the Dirac notation • Note that the above eigenvalue equation has infinite solutions: E0, E1, E2, … & correspondingly ψ0, ψ1, ψ2, … • Our goal is to find the ground state (i.e., the lowest energy state) • Variational theorem • choose any normalized function F containing adjustable parameters, and determine the parameters that minimize <F|Helec|F> • The absolute minimum of <F|Helec|F> will occur when F = ψ0 • Note that E0 = <ψ0|Helec|ψ0> thus, strategy available to solve our problem!

  16. What is Reality?

More Related