1 / 27

Yan Yi Lee, Wagner College, NY, USA Sharon Q. Yang, Rider University, NJ, USA

Folksonomies as Subject Access A Survey of Tagging in Library Online Catalogs and Discovery Layers. IFLA Satellite Post-Conference: Beyond libraries – subject metadata in the digital environment and semantic web 17-18 August 2012, Tallinn. Yan Yi Lee, Wagner College, NY, USA

elewa
Télécharger la présentation

Yan Yi Lee, Wagner College, NY, USA Sharon Q. Yang, Rider University, NJ, USA

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Folksonomies as Subject AccessA Survey of Tagging in Library Online Catalogs and Discovery Layers IFLA Satellite Post-Conference: Beyond libraries – subject metadata in the digital environment and semantic web 17-18 August 2012, Tallinn Yan Yi Lee, Wagner College, NY, USA Sharon Q. Yang, Rider University, NJ, USA

  2. Overview • Introduction • What is folksonomy? • Is folksonomy useful as subject access? • Survey-purpose and methodology • Findings and discussion • Conclusion

  3. What is Folksonomy? • Taxonomy + folk = folksonomy • Classification of resources by users • Describe resources in users’ own language • Tags and tag clouds are folksonomy

  4. Example of Tag Cloud Arcadia Public Library (Arcadia, California) - Feb12, 2012

  5. Folksonomy as Subject Access? Past research compared LCSH with folksonomy in LibraryThing: • Up to 60% of the folksonomy duplicate LCSH. • A small percentage comprises useless tags • Tags use different terms than LCSH • Tags cover more aspect of a book’s subject • 20% to 30% can provide additional access to library collections

  6. So the Questions are… • How do library systems handle folksonomy? • How do libraries handle folksonomy when given the capability? • How do users handle folksonomy when given the opportunity?

  7. Methodology Systems (Marshall Breeding’s Library Technology Guide) • Discovery layers (15) • OAPC of Integrated Library System (37) Libraries • Koha OPACs (307) Users • Koha OPACS (307)

  8. Discovery Tools & Tagging The survey checked all the major discovery tools • 47% Discovery Tools allow users to add tags • 40% can display Tag list • 33% can display a tag cloud • 27% can display both • 47% execute a new search • 20% narrow a search

  9. 15 Discovery Tools & Tagging

  10. Integrated Library Systems and Tagging • The survey includes 37 Major Integrated Library Systems (ILSs) - Tagging function in ILS - Tag could or tag list in OPAC, or both - Tag to start a new search - Tag to refine a search result

  11. 37 ILSs & Tagging

  12. 37 ILSs & Tagging - continued

  13. Integrated Library Systems and Tagging - continued • Only 2 out of 37 ILSs allow Tagging – Koha & Genesis G3 (5% ILSs) • Koha is the only ILS has tag cloud in the online catalog (OPAC) • Koha uses tags to enhance subject access • None ILS uses tags to refine search results

  14. Libraries & Tagging • Take Koha as an example ILS for the survey • Koha - Open Source Integrated Library System, created in 1999 • A survey of tagging activities in 307 Koha implementers - 218 public libraries - 62 academic libraries - 27 school libraries

  15. Libraries & Tagging - continued • All tags in Koha Tag Cloud are created by users • Users can create tags in Koha for private or public • Tags were proved by librarians before adding to Cloud for public • External dictionary in Koha – a whitelist to verify terms added by users

  16. Tagging in 307 Koha OPACs

  17. Tagging in 307 Koha OPACs - continued

  18. Tagging in 307 Koha OPACs - continued • 149 out of 307 libraries encourage users to add tags to OPACs (51%) • Academic libraries: nearly 58% enabled • Public libraries: 49% enabled • School libraries: 22% enabled

  19. Users & Tagging • How much did users take advantage of Tagging? • Tag clouds grouped into 4 categories - Large cloud (over 50 tags) - Small cloud (Less than 50 tags) - Empty cloud (Tagging turned on, but no tags) - No cloud (Tagging turned off)

  20. Users & Tagging - continued

  21. A Test of Tagging • Tag Cloud in Wagner College Koha OPAC – a test (Sandbox) • Tags are simple terms created by students in their own language • Some tags are closer to subject headings • Searching by tags only retrieve limited titles tag “microbiology” => 3 titles subject “microbiology” => 262 titles

  22. Tag Cloud in Wagner College Koha OPAC

  23. Conclusion - Think outside the box • More systems need to include tagging capability in design (47% in discovery layers vs. 5% in ILS) • All libraries should give users the opportunity to tag (49% enabled) • Find innovative ways to encourage users to participate in tagging

  24. Food for Thought More research is needed for • Why public library users are more active in tagging? • Better subject access to combine user contributed tagging and keyword extraction into one tag cloud? • How to link/map LCSH to user contributed tags?

  25. Questions and Answers

  26. Credits Breeding, M. (2012). Guides: Resources and content on relevant topics. In Library technology guides: Key resources in the field of library automation [This site has comprehensive listings of Integrated Library Systems and discovery tools]. Retrieved March 6, 2012, from http://www.librarytechnology.org/web/Breeding/guides/ Kwan, Y., & Lois Mai, C. (2009). Linking folksonomy to Library of Congress subject headings: an exploratory study. Journal Of Documentation, 65(6), 872-900. Liu, C., Park, J., & Hu, X. (2010). User tags versus expert-assigned subject terms: A comparison Of LibraryThing tags and Library of Congress Subject Headings. Journal Of Information Science, 36(6), 763-779. doi:10.1177/0165551510386173 Rolla, P. J. (2009). User Tags versus Subject Headings: Can User-Supplied Data Improve Subject Access to Library Collections?. Library Resources & Technical Services, 53(3), 174-184. Wetterstrom, M. (2008). The Complementarity of Tags and LCSH — A Tagging Experiment And Investigation into Added Value in a New Zealand Library Context. New Zealand Library & Information Management Journal, 50(4), 296-310. Yi, K., & Chan, L. (2009). Linking folksonomy to Library of Congress subject headings: an exploratory study. Journal Of Documentation, 65(6), 872-900.

More Related