1 / 22

ELEMENTS OF A 5(a)(2) OSHA STANDARD VIOLATION (Prima Facie)

ELEMENTS OF A 5(a)(2) OSHA STANDARD VIOLATION (Prima Facie). The standard applies to the cited working conditions. The terms of the standard were not complied with. Employees had access to the violative condition, and

elita
Télécharger la présentation

ELEMENTS OF A 5(a)(2) OSHA STANDARD VIOLATION (Prima Facie)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. ELEMENTS OF A 5(a)(2) OSHA STANDARD VIOLATION(Prima Facie) • The standard applies to the cited working conditions. • The terms of the standard were not complied with. • Employees had access to the violative condition, and • Knowledge of the violation. (The employer knew of the violative condition or could have through the exercise of reasonable diligence.) • Are you inspecting the worksite often enough?

  2. Employer can challenge: • The standard applies to the cited working conditions. • The terms of the standard were complied with. • Employees had access to the violative condition, and • The employer knew of the violative condition or could have, through the exercise of reasonable diligence. • Affirmative defenses • Constitutionality

  3. AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES • Commonly used by employers in contested cases

  4. Affirmative Defenses • Unpreventable employee misconduct or isolated incidence. • Impossibility \ Infeasible • Greater Hazard • Multi-employer

  5. EMPLOYEE MISCONDUCTGENERAL PRINCIPLE • If an employee is negligent or creates a violation, that does not necessarily prevent the employer from being held responsible for the violation.

  6. UNPREVENTABILITY • General principle. • “[An employer] cannot fail to properly train and supervise its employees and then hide behind its lack of knowledge concerning their working practices.” • IT IS NOT UNPREVENTABLE IF YOU ARE NOT EFFECTIVELY MANAGING. • What has been done to prevent it???

  7. Employer Can Establish An Employee Misconduct/ Unpeventability Defense By Showing: • Existence of an effective safety program designed to prevent the violation. • Adequate safety instructions effectively communicated to employees. (Training) • Means to discovering violations of instructions. (Follow-up inspections) • Enforcement of safety rules. (Discipline) SET EXPECTATIONS HOLD PEOPLE ACCOUNTABLE

  8. COURTS Effort to identify hazards Establish work rules Effective communication of work rule (training) Inspection (follow-up) Effective enforcement MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES Employer commitment Employee involvement Workplace analyses Hazard prevention and control Safety and health training Safety And Health Program Elements:A “Regulatory Compliance” Perspective

  9. GREATER HAZARD • GENERAL PRINCIPLE: • Even if the employer demonstrates that his method is less hazardous than compliance, he may not be able to disprove that there were feasible alternative protective methods. • The Review Commission has been rejecting this affirmative defense if: • The compliance officer has been able to demonstrate a feasible method of abatement, or • Employer has not applied for a Variance

  10. IMPOSSIBILITY DEFENSE • ELEMENTS • Compliance is functionally impossible or would prevent performances of required work; and • There are no alternative means of employee protection. • The first element above may take either of two forms: • The regulation can be complied with, but the employer can demonstrate that such compliance would preclude performance of work; or • The employer proves that it is physically impossible for the employer to comply with the cited regulation.

  11. IMPOSSIBILITY DEFENSE • ELEMENT - 2 • Alternative means of employee protection are unavailable, • To establish this element of the defense the employer must demonstrate that: • He used adequate alternative measures or that alternative measures were completely unavailable.

  12. MULTIEMPLOYER WORKSITE POLICY Field Operations Manual

  13. Multi-employer Worksites • Both construction and non-construction • Citations normally issued to exposing employer • Employers may be cited whether or not their own employees are exposed

  14. Multi-employer WorksitesCitable Employers • Employer who actually creates the hazard (creating employer) • Employer who has employees exposed to the hazard (exposing employer) • Employer responsible by contract • Employer who has authority for ensuring hazardous condition is corrected (controlling employer) • Employer who has responsibility for correcting the hazard (correcting employer)

  15. MULTIEMPLOYER • Affirmative defense an exposing employer can use to challenge and OSHA citation

  16. Legitimate Defense for Exposing Employer • Did not create the hazard • Did not have the responsibility or authority to have hazard corrected • Did not have ability to correct or remove the hazard • Specifically notifies controlling/correcting employer of the hazard • Instructed employees to recognize and avoid hazards • Took appropriate steps to protect employees • In extreme circumstances, removes employees

  17. KCAO Enforcement SummaryFiscal Year 2011 • Total Inspections = 676 • % in-compliance inspections = 17.9% • % Construction Inspections = 58.6% • % Serious Violations = 90% • Average $ per violation = $3519 • # accident Investigations = 12 • # Complaints handled = 329 • # Significant Cases = 3

  18. Scaffolding Fall Protection Ladders Fall Protection, Training Requirements Hazard Communication General Safety & Health Provisions Head Protection Aerial Lifts Eye & Face Protection Specific Excavation Requirements FY 2011 Top 10 Most Cited Standards(Construction Industry)

  19. Without a good safety program, you could end up with your a$$ in a sling!

  20. Understand Accident Causes • Accidents are caused by: • Unsafe conditions • Unsafe acts

  21. Safety And Health Program Elements:A “Beyond Regulatory Compliance” Perspective

  22. SAFETY PAYS!!! • THANKS!!! • Mark Banden • (816) 217-3274, CELL • Banden.Mark@dol.gov

More Related