1 / 64

Simulation of Sediment Transport due to Dam Removal and Control of Morphological Changes

Simulation of Sediment Transport due to Dam Removal and Control of Morphological Changes. Yan Ding* and Eddy Langendoen** * National Center for Computational Hydroscience and Engineering, The University of Mississippi, University, MS 38677, U.S.A.

elsu
Télécharger la présentation

Simulation of Sediment Transport due to Dam Removal and Control of Morphological Changes

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Simulation of Sediment Transport due to Dam Removal and Control of Morphological Changes Yan Ding* and Eddy Langendoen** * National Center for Computational Hydroscience and Engineering, The University of Mississippi, University, MS 38677, U.S.A. **Channel and Watershed Processes Research Unit USDA Agricultural Research Service National Sedimentation Laboratory, Oxford, MS 38655, U.S.A.

  2. Outline Introduction Numerical Simulation of Post Dam Removal Sediment Dynamics Along the Kalamazoo River Between Otsego and Plainwell, Michigan Numerical Simulation of Morphological Changes due to Marmot Dam Removal in Sandy River, Oregon Preliminary Study on Optimal Control of Sediment Release in the Dam Removal Process Concluding Remarks

  3. Dam Removal Impact and River Restoration Financial issue : Operating and maintenance costs outweigh the benefits - including hydropower, flood control, irrigation, or recreation, Functional issue: where the dam no longer serves any useful purpose, Ecological issues: restoring flows for fish and wildlife, reinstating the natural sediment and nutrient flow, Safety issues: eliminating safety risks, Recreational issues: restoring opportunities for recreation.  The impacts of removal have been addressed by different studies. Generally they can be divided into main categories. (1) Short-Term Ecological Impacts of Dam Removal Sediment Release, Increased Sediment Concentration and Contaminated Sediment, and (2) Long-Term Impacts of Dam Removal (Flow change regimes, temperature, sediment transport and water quality)

  4. Case Study: Numerical Simulation of Post Dam Removal Sediment Dynamics Along the Kalamazoo River Between Otsego and Plainwell, Michigan

  5. DA: 2,020 sq mi Relief: 686 ft

  6. Background • Otsego City Dam • Built in 1840s to create freight business • Papermill was constructed in 1880s and remains in operation • Repaired and rebuild over time • 151 ft x 13 ft • Plainwell Dam • Built around 1900 to provide power • Power generators decommissioned in mid 1960s • Superstructure and part of spillway removed in mid 1980s • 172 ft x 14 ft

  7. Background (cont.) • PCB contaminated sediments deposited in the dam impoundments • Banks: 5 mg/kg – 82 mg/kg • Floodplain: 3 mg/kg – 84 mg/kg • MDNR interested in removing the dams • MDEQ and EPA interested in understanding present condition and potential concerns (bank erosion)

  8. Summary of Studies • LimnoTech • KALSIM: HEC6, Bank erosion based on Osman & Thorne (1988), PCB fate model • USGS • Survey transects, flow velocity, instream sediments • SEDMOD (Bennett) • Channel restoration design • NSL • Identify streambank erosion problems: static model (USGS) and dynamic model (NSL) • Collect streambank material properties: erodibility and shear strength

  9. Impoundment Area: 3,290,000 sq ft Volume of deposit: 457,000 cu yd (56% main-stem channel)

  10. Impoundment Area: 701,000 sq ft Volume of deposit: 77,600 cu yd

  11. Modeling Scenarios • Dams In (no change, DI) • Dams Out (DO) • Design (D) • 38-year long discharge time series constructed from 1984-2003 period of record • Simulation period: 2000-2037

  12. Output: Changes in channel geometry Time series of hydraulic variables and sediment yield Input: Channel geometry Composition of bed and bank materials Erosion resistance and shear strength of bed and bank materials Rates of flow and sediments entering the channel Bendway weir Bed evolution and sediment transport Streambank erosion Flow hydraulics CONCEPTS – CONservational Channel Evolution and Pollutant Transport System CONCEPTS simulates long-term response of channels to loadings of water and sediments, and to instream structures

  13. BST – shear strength Jet test – erodibility

  14. CHANNEL MODEL

  15. 11% 6% 108% 5% 77% 8% 9% 90% 11% 74% 1% 12% 17% 84% 99% 4% 10% 95% 5% 6%

  16. DI - RESULTS

  17. VALIDATION

  18. Dams In Scenario

  19. POC4 – Dams In Scenario

  20. G8 – Dams In Scenario

  21. DO - RESULTS

  22. Simulated Bed Adjustment • Dams Out Scenario Plainwell Dam Otsego City Dam

  23. Remobilization & transport Deposition Upstream migration Rapid incision Simulated Bed Adjustment (cont.) • Dams Out Scenario

  24. Followed by widening Narrowing Simulated Top Width Adjustment • Dams Out Scenario

  25. G1 G2

  26. G5 G6

  27. D - RESULTS

  28. P17 G1

  29. POC6 POC4

  30. Streambank Erosion – Comparison

  31. Average Annual Load – Comparison

  32. Case Study: Numerical Simulation of Morphological Changes due to Marmot Dam Removal in Sandy River, Oregon Objective of control in this case: Validation of sediment transport model Minimize the morphological changes (erosion and deposition) at downstream by diverting extra sediments from the reservoir (dredging?)

  33. Marmot Dam Removal in the Sandy River, Oregon http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i1NI2ia3nDw

  34. Rainfall-Runoff Simulation Upland Soil Erosion (AGNPS or SWAT) Channel Network and Sub-basin Definition (TOPAZ) Digital Elevation Model (DEM) Channel Network Flow and Sediment Routing (CCHE1D) Integrated Watershed & Channel Network Modeling with CCHE1D Principal Features Dynamic Wave Model for Flood Wave Prediction • Hydrodynamic Modeling in Channel Network • Non-uniform Total-Load Transport • Non-equilibrium Transport Model • Coupled Sediment Transport Equations Solution • Bank Erosion and Mass Failure • Several Methods for Determination of Sediment-Related Parameters where Q = discharge; Z=water stage; A=Cross-sectional Area; q=Lateral outflow; =correction factor; R=hydraulic radius n = Manning’s roughness • Boundary Conditions • Initial Conditions (Base Flows) • Internal Flow Conditions for Channel Network

  35. CCHE1D Sediment Transport Model Principal Features Non-equilibrium transport of non-uniform sediments • Non-uniform Total-Load Transport • Non-equilibrium SedTran Model • Coupled SedTran Equations Solution (Direct Solution Technique) • Bank Erosion and Mass Failure • Several Methods for Determination of Sediment-Related Parameters A=cross-section area; Ctk=section-averaged sediment concentration of size class k; Qtk=actual sediment transport rate; Qt*k=sediment transport capacity; Ls=adaptation length andQlk= lateral inflow or outflow sediment discharge per unit channel length; Ut=section averaged velocity of sediment

  36. Sandy River Longitudinal Profiles Computational Reach Major J. J. et al (2012), USGS Technical Report, http://pubs.usgs.gov/pp/1792/

  37. Reservoir Sediment Property Reservoir deposition profile (Source: PGE photogrametry, 1999) Reservoir sediment size composition (Stillwater Science, 1999)

  38. Simulation Model Parameters: CCHE1D

  39. Sediment size classes used in the simulations

  40. Boundary Conditions for Model Validation Simulation Period 10/19/2007 – 09/30/2008 Downstream Water Depth Hydrograph Upstream Discharge Hydrograph

More Related