1 / 8

draft-ietf-tewg-diff-te-proto-05.txt draft-ietf-tewg-diff-te-russian-04.txt

DS-TE protocol Extensions Russian Dolls Model (RDM) Maximum Allocation Model (MAM) Maximum Allocation w Reservation(MAR). draft-ietf-tewg-diff-te-proto-05.txt draft-ietf-tewg-diff-te-russian-04.txt draft-ietf-tewg-diff-te-mam-01.txt draft-ietf-tewg-te-mar-02.txt Francois Le Faucheur

elvis
Télécharger la présentation

draft-ietf-tewg-diff-te-proto-05.txt draft-ietf-tewg-diff-te-russian-04.txt

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. DS-TE protocol ExtensionsRussian Dolls Model (RDM)Maximum Allocation Model (MAM) Maximum Allocation w Reservation(MAR) draft-ietf-tewg-diff-te-proto-05.txt draft-ietf-tewg-diff-te-russian-04.txt draft-ietf-tewg-diff-te-mam-01.txt draft-ietf-tewg-te-mar-02.txt Francois Le Faucheur flefauch@cisco.com

  2. Closed Issue 1 Vienna Issue: • relationship between “Shared Mesh Restoration “and DS-TE Bandwidth Constraints Models” needs to be understood • is there an issue? • How do we address it?

  3. Closed Issue 1 (Ctnd) • Conclusions: • Shared Mesh Restoration can work simultaneously with DS-TE. • Shared Mesh Restoration should operate independently within each DS-TE Class-Type (and not across Class-Types).     • Shared Mesh Restoration can work with RDM, MAM and MAR • Resolution: • make a wording change to the definition of "Reserved (CTc)" which is used in the formulas for defining RDM, MAM and MAR so that the formulas are compatible with how Shared-Mesh Restoration performs bandwidth reservation/CAC   • add a note in RDM, MAM and MAR specs that these BC Model definitions are compatible with Shared Mesh Restoration with the assumption that Shared Mesh Restoration operates independently within each Class-Type. • Reference: • email 26 Aug subject “Result of investigation Relationship between Shared Mesh Restoration and DSTE Bandwidth Constraints Models” for details

  4. Closed Issue 2 • Issue: raised bydraft-sivabalan-diff-te-bundling and discussed in Vienna • MPLS TE base specs discuss use of preemption priority p • DS-TE proto redefines unreservable bandwidth available at priority "p" to be the reservable bandwidth available for TE-Class "i“ • TE improvements (eg bundled links, FA-LSP,..) refer to how to address the particulars of that improvement with regards to priority “p” (not to TE-Class “i”) • TE improvements need to be generalised to apply to TE-Class “i” • Resolution: • Add a section in –proto- “7.DS-TE support with MPLS extensions.”

  5. Closed Issue 2 (Ctnd) • Resolution: • Add in –proto- a section tatement that for the IGP and RSVP RFCs, as well as technologies that improve upon them (e.g. FA-LSP, link bundling, etc..), in order to be DS-TE compliant, you need to map all references of "p" to TE-Class[i] and map • make a wording change to the definition of "Reserved (CTc)" which is used in the formulas for defining RDM, MAM and MAR so that the formulas are compatible with how Shared-Mesh Restoration performs bandwidth reservation/CAC   • that these BC Model definitions are compatible with Shared Mesh Restoration with the assumption that Shared Mesh Restoration operates independently within each Class-Type. • Reference: • email 26 Aug subject “Result of investigation Relationship between Shared Mesh Restoration and DSTE Bandwidth Constraints Models” for details

  6. Open Issues • None

  7. Status • -proto-: Standards Track • -rdm-, -mam-, -mar: Informational Track • WG Last Call completed • Under IESG Review

  8. Thank You !

More Related