1 / 10

The Design of the Partnership (Trusteeship 101) CAIS Trustee/Heads Conference January, 2014

The Design of the Partnership (Trusteeship 101) CAIS Trustee/Heads Conference January, 2014. Judith R. Glickman, Partner jglickman@educatorscollaborative.com. The design of the partnership Your relationship with the Head of School Your respective roles A growth mind set

emelda
Télécharger la présentation

The Design of the Partnership (Trusteeship 101) CAIS Trustee/Heads Conference January, 2014

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Design of the Partnership(Trusteeship 101) CAIS Trustee/Heads ConferenceJanuary, 2014 Judith R. Glickman, Partner jglickman@educatorscollaborative.com

  2. The design of the partnership • Your relationship with the Head of School • Your respective roles • A growth mind set • Communication protocols • Resource information Our Priorities for Today

  3. Whole group presentation • Small group analysis • Whole group synthesis Process

  4. Above the Diagonal Line = Allocation of Board’s Time Design of the Partnership

  5. Relationship with the head of school • Board Chair • Board of Trustees • Individual Trustees/Resources

  6. RESPECTIVE ROLES • Policy vs. day-to-day responsibility • Strategic vs. tactical • Full Board vs. Executive Committee function

  7. Growth Mind Set • Succession • Giving and Stewardship • Serving as a Single Entity • Fiduciary, Strategic, Generative • Support of the Head

  8. COMMUNICATION PROTOCOLS • Board Chair/Head • Flow to avoid bottlenecks • No surprises • “I was a parent.”

  9. Case Study There is considerable parking lot discussion about the school’s science program in the middle grades. There is strong sentiment on two sides of the issue: a vocal group of parents think that the program is outdated and is not emphasizing project based learning and experiential instruction. Another group thinks and feels equally strongly that the issue has arisen because two teachers are wedded to their existing curriculum and position within the faculty and are unwilling to look at ways of teaching differently. The Head of School and Division Director understand how these perceptions have arisen but are hesitant to move as quickly to address the personnel and program issues as several trustees think they should. The HOS thinks it is critical that the process be thought through carefully and implemented in a way to not undermine the overall faculty and their perception of intrusive parenting. What are the issues? What should the head do? What should the chair do? What should the board do?

  10. Above the Diagonal Line = Allocation of Board’s Time Design of the Partnership

More Related