1 / 42

ACF Regional Programme Horn of Africa

ACF Regional Programme Horn of Africa. Set of slides used during country-level workshops (example ACF Uganda ). Background. Regional programme across 6 ACF missions (Djibouti, Ethiopia , Kenya, Somalia, Southern Sudan, Uganda) Over 3 years starting 1 October 2011

emery
Télécharger la présentation

ACF Regional Programme Horn of Africa

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ACF Regional ProgrammeHorn of Africa Set of slides used during country-level workshops (example ACF Uganda)

  2. Background Regional programme across 6 ACF missions (Djibouti, Ethiopia, Kenya, Somalia, Southern Sudan, Uganda) Over 3 years starting 1 October 2011 Complementary programming to existing country programmes Programming in existing vs. new bases 19 septembre 2014 2

  3. Feedback Steering Committe Meeting Definition of the Regional Strategic Programming Framework Disaster Risk Management Nutrition security/integrated approach As closely linked as possible 19 septembre 2014 3

  4. Feedback Steering Committe Meeting Advantages of DRM as a Regional Strategic Programming Framework ACF has developed conceptual understanding (ACF DRM policy, ACF DRM guidelines, ACF DRM tool kit) ACF has collected first experiences in project implementation (e.g. in Ethiopia) In line with pillar 2 of ACF 2015 strategy Clear donor interest in the region Allows for climate change to be included as an aggravating factor 19 septembre 2014 4

  5. Feedback Steering Committe Meeting Disadvantages/challenges of DRM as a Regional Strategic Programming Framework: Undernutrition conceptually not clearly positioned as risk, cause, or outcome etc.  could lead to weakness in conceptual/strategic approach No evidence in the region that undernutrition is a direct impact of disasters (including conflicts) frequently occurring in the region, clearly less significant than displacement and other direct impacts. Undernutrition rather a long-term impact, and therefore more difficult to link to DRM Limited time for regional disaster risk data analysis/ lack of availability of regional data ACF not yet a renowned actor in DRM arena in the region Could lead to stronger emphasis of FSL and WaSH in the programming 19 septembre 2014 5

  6. Feedback Steering Committe Meeting Advantages of nutrition security/integrated approach as a Regional Strategic Programming Framework Needs to be included as nutrition is the core of ACF’s mandate ACF has a lot of experiences and success stories/lessons learnt In line with pillar 1 of ACF 2015 strategy Will allow to include most/all ACF typical sector approaches, particularly in the field of prevention of undernutrition 19 septembre 2014 6

  7. Feedback Steering Committe Meeting Disadvantages/challenges of nutrition security/integrated approach as a Regional Strategic Programming Framework: May create conceptual problems to include treatment of MAM and SAM Integration on the ground of ACF activities in some countries (e.g. Somalia) rather limited as of today, and facing operational difficulties 19 septembre 2014 7

  8. ACF DRM Objectives 19 septembre 2014 8

  9. Feedback background note 2+3 ACF Uganda’s success stories (particularly in terms of programming/projects/technical innovations) ACF’s image/perception of ACF Uganda from donors (what is ACF known for Uganda) Potential niches for ACF to fill in the landscape of humanitarian/development actors in Uganda, also based ACF’s expertise and organizational capacity ACF’s forward-looking vision in Uganda Regional (Horn of Africa) technical initiatives/consortia/partnerships that ACF Uganda is involved/knows of/should be involved in? 19 septembre 2014 9

  10. Expected outputs of today’s ‘work’shop Be on the same page regarding DRM programming Problem tree – solution tree – draft LFA for Uganda sub-project Expected until 22 June Advanced draft LFA Draft summary budget? Expected until mid July Detailed LFA and budget Draft/completed country disaster risk profile Input on some regional data tables 19 septembre 2014 10

  11. Clarifying DRM terminology A disaster occurs only if a hazard affects people or communities who have insufficient capacity to cope Disaster risk = hazard x vulnerability / coping capacity 19 septembre 2014 11

  12. Components of DRM programming – Learning to Use the DRM jargon 19 septembre 2014

  13. When does ACF intervene/exit? What indicators/threshold to follow and to use beyond SAM and GAM? Non-nutrition related disasters Understanding of disaster dynamics? Enough data? Enough analysis? Link to undernutrition clear/understood? What role does ACF have in CBDRM: Direct implementer vs. facilitator/technical assistance/community-based implementation (including procurement)/monitor/evaluator/supervisor/controller Working with/through partners? 19 septembre 2014 13

  14. From community-based towards community-managed DRR - A paradigm shift for ACF? • Page 48 manual • Facts page 49 and 50

  15. From community-based towards community-managed DRR - A paradigm shift for ACF? • Page 48 manual • Facts page 49 and 50

  16. Two complementary axes to reduce vulnerability to undernutrition A twofold strategy to achieve sustainable impact Nutritional vulnerability Implement approach to absorb peaks Nutritional vulnerability Nutritional vulnerability 1 Peaks 2 Structural vulnerability Reduce structural vulnerability with selected long-term and RR actions Time Time

  17. DRM more of the same? Or different? Better analysis (particularly hazard/disaster analysis) – participatory analysis merged with scientific analysis Timing of intervention/anticipation Hazard-proof/hazard-adapted technologies Cost-benefit analysis? 19 septembre 2014 18

  18. Timing is of utmost importance

  19. Timing is of utmost importance

  20. SECTION 3: COUNTRY STRATEGY and PROGRAMME INDENTIFICATION Output for Country Strategy Summarised in Context Analysis Summarised in Context Analysis Summarised in Context Analysis, detailed in Humanitarian issues Summarised in Context Analysis, detailed in Humanitarian issues Context Analysis Hazard Analysis Risk Analysis Risk Scenarios ACH Contingency Planning  Risk scenario sheet  Scenarios building workshop  Hazard + risk analysis sheet  Risk Analysis Workshop  Context analysis sheet 3.2 Hazard information 3.3 Country vulnerability profiles 3.4 Stakeholder analysis 3.5 Institutional frameworks 3.2 Hazard information 3.3 Country vulnerability profiles 3.2 Hazard information DRM Guideline Figure : a summary of the main steps to make a country disaster risk analysis, showing where the outputs of each step are included in the country strategy (orange), checklists and detailed reference material from the ACH Contingency Plan (green) to guide each step, and further information provided in this guideline to be used for each step (blue). Close Figure: summary of the main steps to make a country disaster risk analysis Table of contents Section 3 Introduction CD Map 3.7 Country disaster risk analysis • The following methodology provides a basic and global vision of disaster risk for the country strategy. It is adapted and simplified from the ACH Contingency Planning package. This means that a basic idea of contingency planning issues can also be understood during the country strategy process, and this work can be valorised later when the contingency planning process is undertaken. This analysis should examine aspects of natural hazards, conflict (and other man-made factors) and undernutrition potentially leading to disaster. The Philippines contingency plan overview should be referred to as an example for its specific parts that are used for a country strategy. • A simple country risk analysis follows four major steps: • Context analysis, looking at the main vulnerability to disaster and capacity to address disaster within the country. • Hazard analysis, outlining the type and probability of potential hazards. • Risk analysis, which determines and ranks risks (based on the above analyses), and provides a spatial (risk map) and temporal overview (seasonal calendar) of these risks. • Constructing risk scenarios, which provides an overview about the uncertainty of risks for the future. • The country disaster risk analysis is summarised in Figure, indicating: • where the outputs of each of these analyses are included in the country strategy, • checklists and detailed reference material from the ACH Contingency Plan to guide each step, and, • further information sources provided in Section 4 of this guideline to be used for each analysis. COUNTRY DISASTER RISK ANALYSIS Figure: summary of the main steps to make a country disaster risk analysis

  21. Uganda Risk Profiling

  22. Uganda Risk Profiling

  23. Draft programming framework of the ACF regional programme HoA Early Warning/Surveillance/Risk Analysis Disaster Risk Profiles Prevention and Mitigation Response Preparedness Safety nets/social protection Rapid Assessment System Contingency Planning Response & Contingency Fund Promotion of hazard-proof/-adapted technologies including cost-benefit analysis Contingency stock pre-positioning Emergency Response Community-based DRM, including PCVA Risk transfer/risk insurances Emergency response team trained and on stand-by Prevention of undernutrition Building resilience of livelihoods systems including natural resource management DRM capacity development of communities, local authorities etc. Learning and knowledge sharing Coordination Institutional Strengthening

  24. Mandate of humanitarian action has expanded to include long-term, chronic crises, Linking Relief, Rehabilitation and Development (LRRD), building anticipatory local response to prepare for, mitigate and prevent disasters, and contributing to the resilience of communities to emergencies proactive action addressing risk + reactive addressing the impact 19 septembre 2014 27

  25. ACF DRM Objectives To put in place and maintain systematic ACF contingency planning in all operations To prepare for hazards and threats To mitigate and prevent risk via vulnerability reduction and the building of resilience to disaster To build the capacity of local institutions and stakeholders who are mandated to support communities To minimise the impact of key drivers of risk in ACF action 19 septembre 2014 28

  26. 19 septembre 2014 29

  27. Towards a country disaster risk profile Which hazards exist? Where? Magnitude? Frequency? How vulnerable are people towards these disasters? Evidence of increased malnutrition rates? Capacity of communities, different admin. levels to reduce, prevent, respond to disasters? Which frameworks exist? Which coordination mechanisms? How does early warning functions? How does it? What indicators are used? 19 septembre 2014 32

  28. 19 septembre 2014 36

  29. Phases and roles in facilitating CBDRR What indicators/threshold to follow and to use beyond SAM and GAM? ners? 19 septembre 2014 37

  30. How to monitor and evaluate DRM activities? 19 septembre 2014 38

  31. 2a. The logic of intervention in the LFA : the vertical rule – cont’

  32. Feedback background note 2 Would an institutional regional partner (e.g. another INGO) be necessary/useful: To attract funding of that scale To complement ACF programming expertise from a technical perspective To complement ACF programming from a geographical coverage perspective Which type of partnership would be most relevant: Regional implementation partner (i. for joint grant application; ii for joint implementation) Regional research/academic partner (e.g. universities, CGIAR centres such as ILRI, ICRISAT etc.) Local implementation partners in the respective countries (e.g. local NGOs) Which initiative/consortia should ACF get involved in to follow regional developments related to programming, funding etc. 19 septembre 2014 40

  33. What is nutrition security? • Approaches to sustainably shorten the duration of being /to reduce the risk of becoming moderately or severely malnourished • Chronic nutrition insecurity and transitory nutrition insecurity (due to temporary shocks/disasters)

  34. Steps of Community Managed Disaster Risk Reduction Process (Cordaid/IIRR)

More Related