1 / 26

SS/HS Grantee Meeting December 1, 2005

SS/HS Grantee Meeting December 1, 2005. Grants Administration Bryan Williams & Richard Lucey Office of Safe and Drug-Free Schools U.S. Department of Education. Monitoring and Reporting Requirements. Notify Monitor of Changes Post-Award Call Grant Performance Reports

emilie
Télécharger la présentation

SS/HS Grantee Meeting December 1, 2005

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. SS/HS Grantee MeetingDecember 1, 2005 Grants Administration Bryan Williams & Richard Lucey Office of Safe and Drug-Free Schools U.S. Department of Education

  2. Monitoring and Reporting Requirements • Notify Monitor of Changes • Post-Award Call • Grant Performance Reports • Semiannual, Annual and Final Reports

  3. Grant Performance Report (ED 524B) • ED’s generic performance report for discretionary grants • Used by ED’s program offices as a semiannual,annual and final performance report

  4. Purpose of ED 524B • ED collects performance measures data from grantees to demonstrate program success to Congress (Government Performance and Results Act) • Performance information: • Guides ED’s budget request for programs • Ensures program implementation is focused on results • Ensures success is measured by results achieved

  5. Purpose of ED 524B • Financial and performance monitoring tool for ED program offices for individual grants • Semiannual and Annual Reports: Grantees provide data to demonstrate that they are making substantial progress toward meeting approved goals, objectives, and performance measures to receive continuation funding. • Final Reports: Grantees provide data to demonstrate overall project success and impact.

  6. Site Visits • Site visits are a grant monitoring tool as provided for in EDGAR Part 74.51(g), “The Secretary may make site visits, as needed.” • Also called an on-site review • A site visit may last multiple days

  7. Site Visits Reasons to conduct a site visit • Program performance - Excellent • Goals and objectives achieved in unique or innovative ways • Development of effective strategies that may be replicable at other sites

  8. Site Visits Reasons to conduct a site visit • Program performance - Problem • Difficulty achieving goals and objectives • Compliance issues • Fiscal improprieties • Technical assistance

  9. Site Visits What goes into site visit decision • Review of materials • Performance reports • Financial reports • Performance calls

  10. Site Visits What goes into site visit decision • Review of materials • Correspondence • Communication with grant personnel • Request for technical assistance

  11. Fiscal Management • Excessive Drawdown Memo to discretionary grantees • Draw down funds only as necessary • Project director should continually monitor fiscal activity • Excessive Drawdowns • First Quarter: 50 percent or more • Second Quarter: 80 percent or more • Third Quarter: 100 percent

  12. Audit Requirements • Two types of audits • Grantee-Initiated Audit • Independent Auditor • Compliance with OMB Circular A-133 • Expend more than $500,000 or more in collective Federal funds annually must have a single audit or program-specific audit performed for that year

  13. Audit Requirements • Two types of audits • OIG Audit • Office of Inspector General • Not every grantee is audited • Office of Chief Financial Officer reviews A-133 audit reports • OIG audit triggered by serious audit findings identified by OCFO • Questions? Contact grant monitor

  14. Expanded Authorities • Pre-Award Costs • Budget Transfers • Carryover • No-Cost Time Extensions

  15. Expanded AuthoritiesPre-Award Costs • Parts 74.25(e)(1) and 75.263 • No prior approval up to 90 days prior • New and continuation awards • Reasonable expectation • Expenditures incurred at own risk • Funds unavailable pre-budget period

  16. Expanded AuthoritiesBudget Transfers • Attachment Z limits budget transfers • Must have FPO approval to transfer more than 10% of funds in a single budget (1,2,5,6 or 3,4) • No funds transferred between budgets 1,2,5,6 and 3,4. • Questions about transfer approval? Ask your FPO.

  17. Expanded AuthoritiesBudget Transfers • Under 10%, no prior approval required unless: • Change in project scope, objectives, or activities • Change in key personnel • Notify grant monitor of transfer • Amount of money • Identify budget and categories • Purpose

  18. Expanded AuthoritiesCarryover • Parts 74.25(e)(3) and 75.253(c)(1) • Unexpended funds automatically carry over from one budget period to the next without prior approval • Written justification needed prior to continuation award • Carryover budget must be approved

  19. Expanded AuthoritiesNo-Cost Time Extensions • Parts 74.25(e)(2) and 75.261 • One-time extension for up to 12 months without prior approval • Written justification needed at least 10 days prior to extension • Cannot be for the purpose of exhausting unexpended funds • Cannot require additional funds nor change the project’s scope or objectives

  20. Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) • Any person has the right to request access to federal agency records or information • All records must be made available (application, performance reports, correspondence), except: • Privileged or confidential information • Personal information

  21. Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) • FOIA Process • Project Director contacted • 10 days to respond to ED • Memo to FOIA Officer from ED • Information sent to requestor • Fee involved: research and personnel

  22. Human Subjects Research • Research – “systematic investigation” • Human Subject – “an individual about whom an investigator obtains data or identifiable private information” • Activities include surveys, focus groups • Clearance from ED’s Human Subjects Research group is required • Questions? Contact FPO and/or Helene Deramond (Helene.Deramond@ed.gov)

  23. Useful Resources • EDGAR (Education Department General Administrative Regulations) • Book (not a person) • Reference Tool • Part 75 Direct Grant Programs, but all applicable

  24. Useful Resources • Education Department General Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) http://www.ed.gov/policy/fund/reg/edgarReg/edgar.html • OMB Circulars http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/circulars/ OMB Circular A-87 • Grant Policy Bulletins http://www.ed.gov/policy/fund/guid/gposbul/gposbul.html

  25. Useful Resources • Monitoring for Excessive Drawdowns www.ed.gov/policy/fund/guid/gposbul/gpos27.html • So You Want to Know About Indirect Costs www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocfo/fipao/abouticg.html • Human Subjects www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocfo/humansub.html

  26. Useful Resources SS/HS Website www.sshs.samhsa.gov SS/HS Federal Partners websites – may contain other useful resources www.ed.gov www.samhsa.gov www.ojjdp.ncjrs.org/

More Related